2083: A European Declaration of Independence

By Andrew Berwick, London, 2011
PDF, 1518 pages, 7.8 MB
(link removed)

Edited by Andy Ross

The compendium documents "that the fear of Islamisation is all but irrational."

It covers the following main topics:
1. The rise of cultural Marxism/multiculturalism in Western Europe
2. Why the Islamic colonisation and Islamisation of Western Europe began
3. The current state of the Western European Resistance Movements (anti-Marxist/anti-Jihad movements)
4. Solutions for Western Europe and how we, the resistance, should move forward in the coming decades
5. Relevant topics including solutions and strategies for all of the 8 different political fronts

The compendium presents advanced ideological, practical, tactical, organisational and rhetorical solutions and strategies for all patriotic-minded individuals/movements.

Included are also demographical studies, historical statistics, forecasts and insights on various subjects related to the ongoing and future struggle of Europe. It covers most topics related to historical events and aspects of past and current Islamic Imperialism, which is now removed or falsified by our academia by instruction of Western Europe's cultural relativist elites (cultural relativism = cultural Marxism). It offers thorough analysis of Islam, which is unknown to a majority of Europeans. It documents how the political doctrines known as multiculturalism/cultural Marxism/cultural relativism was created and implemented. Multiculturalists/cultural Marxists usually operate under the disguise of humanism. A majority are anti-nationalists and want to deconstruct European identity, traditions, culture and even nation states.

The root of Europe's problems is the lack of cultural self-confidence (nationalism). Most people are still terrified of nationalistic political doctrines.

This book presents the only solutions to our current problems. You cannot defeat Islamisation or halt/reverse the Islamic colonization of Western Europe without first removing the political doctrines manifested through multiculturalism/cultural Marxism.

I have written approximately half of the compendium myself. The rest is a compilation of works from several courageous individuals throughout the world.

The content of the compendium truly belongs to everyone and is free to be distributed in any way or form.

Multiculturalism (cultural Marxism/political correctness) is the root cause of the ongoing Islamisation of Europe which has resulted in the ongoing Islamic colonisation of Europe through demographic warfare (facilitated by our own leaders). This compendium presents the solutions and explains exactly what is required of each and every one of us in the coming decades. We have only a few decades to consolidate a sufficient level of resistance before our major cities are completely demographically overwhelmed by Muslims.


The introductory chapter explains how "cultural" Marxism gradually infiltrated our post-WW2 societies.

One of conservatism's most important insights is that all ideologies are wrong. Ideology takes an intellectual system, a product of one or more philosophers, and says, "This system must be true." Inevitably, reality ends up contradicting the system, usually on a growing number of points. But the ideology, by its nature, cannot adjust to reality; to do so would be to abandon the system. Therefore, reality must be suppressed. If the ideology has power, it uses its power to undertake this suppression. It forbids writing or speaking certain facts. Its goal is to prevent not only expression of thoughts that contradict what "must be true," but thinking such thoughts. In the end, the result is inevitably the concentration camp, the gulag and the grave.

But what happens today to Europeans who suggest that there are differences among ethnic groups, or that the traditional social roles of men and women reflect their different natures, or that homosexuality is morally wrong? If they are public figures, they must grovel in the dirt in endless, canting apologies. If they are university students, they face star chamber courts and possible expulsion. If they are employees of private corporations, they may face loss of their jobs. What was their crime? Contradicting the new ideology of Political Correctness.

Political Correctness

Political Correctness is cultural Marxism. The effort to translate Marxism from economics into culture goes back at least to the writings of the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci. In 1923, in Germany, a group of Marxists founded an institute later known as the Frankfurt School. One of its founders, Georg Lukacs, stated its purpose as answering the question, "Who shall save us from Western Civilisation?" The Frankfurt School blended Marx with Freud, and later influences (some Fascist as well as Marxist) added linguistics to create critical theory and deconstruction. These in turn influenced education theory, and through institutions of higher education gave birth to what we now call Political Correctness.

Political Correctness now looms over Western European society like a colossus. It has taken over both political wings, left and right. It controls the most powerful element in our culture, the media and entertainment industry. It dominates both public and higher education. It has even captured the higher clergy in many Christian churches. Anyone in the establishment who departs from its dictates swiftly ceases to be a member of the establishment.

How can Western Europeans combat Political Correctness and retake their society from the cultural Marxists?

Those who would defeat cultural Marxism must defy it. They must use words it forbids, and refuse to use the words it mandates. They must shout from the housetops the realities it seeks to suppress, such as our opposition to Sharia on a national and local level, the Islamisation of our countries, the facts that violent crime is disproportionately committed by Muslims and that most cases of AIDS are acquired from immoral sexual acts. They must refuse to turn their children over to public schools. Above all, those who would defy Political Correctness must behave according to the old rules of our culture, not the new rules the cultural Marxists lay down. Ladies should be wives and homemakers, not cops or soldiers, and men should still hold doors open for ladies. Children should not be born out of wedlock. Glorification of homosexuality should be shunned. Jurors should not accept Islam as an excuse for murder.

Political Correctness prospers by disguising itself. Through defiance, and through education on our own part , we can strip away its camouflage and reveal the Marxism beneath the window dressing.

Political Correctness seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behaviour on all Europeans and is therefore totalitarian in nature. Its roots lie in a version of Marxism which seeks a radical inversion of the traditional culture in order to create a social revolution.

Betty Friedan's revolution in sex roles is a manifestation of the social revolutionary process begun by Karl Marx. The idea of transforming a patriarchy into a matriarchy can be connected directly to Friedrich Engels' 1884 book The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. The belief that matriarchy was the solution to patriarchy flows from Marx's comments in The German Ideology, published in 1845. The Frankfurt School's matriarchal theory and its near-relation, androgyny theory, both originated from these sources.

Political Correctness is Marxism, with all that implies: loss of freedom of expression, thought control, inversion of the traditional social order, and ultimately a totalitarian state. If anything, the cultural Marxism created by the Frankfurt School is more horrifying than the old, economic Marxism that ruined Russia. At least the economic Marxists did not exalt sexual perversion and attempt to create a matriarchy.

The origins of Political Correctness can be traced to the rise of modern ideology and its quest for power. In contrast to the classical and Judeo-Christian traditions, which stressed man's need to understand the moral order and conform himself to it, modern ideologies have sought to dominate and control the world. In the twentieth century these ideologies gained political power in Communist states.

In the West, radical intellectuals have sought to undermine the foundations of knowledge itself, concentrating their efforts on the transformation of the university. The turning point came in the 1960s, when militant students launched a guerrilla attack on the traditions of Western culture and the liberal arts. Seeing that they could not gain lasting power through demonstrations alone, many of these militants opted to remain in the system, going on to become professors themselves. This generation of cultural Marxist radicals has now become the establishment in the majority of our institutions of higher learning.

In his seminal book The Idea of a University, Cardinal John Henry Newman defined the "liberal arts" as a pursuit of knowledge for its own sake. By way of contrast, he defined the "servile arts" as those modes of study that serve only specific, immediate ends. The liberal arts are liberating, Newman argued, because they enable men to discover the underlying principles that guide us toward wisdom and virtue. Were he alive today, Newman would view political correctness as servile because its purpose is to advance a political agenda to a position of national power.

Stanford University has long played a leadership role in American higher education. Stanford eliminated its long-standing Western civilisation requirement in 1988 and replaced it with a multicultural program known as "Cultures, Ideas, and Values." Under this new program freshmen at Stanford can just as easily study Marxist revolutionaries in Central America as they can Plato, Shakespeare, or Newton. Stanford history students are not required to take a single course in history. Instead, they are offered a choice of courses under the heading of “American Cultures.” Stanford students must also take courses in world cultures and gender studies. Because elite institutions such as Stanford set an example for the rest of American and European higher education, other universities eagerly adopt these devastating assaults on the curriculum.

The two pillars that have traditionally sustained the liberal arts are academic freedom and freedom of speech. Without the freedom to pursue the truth and to write and speak freely, authentic scholarship is impossible. But both of these fundamental freedoms have been routinely abrogated by the establishment of speech codes, "sensitivity" classes, and a general atmosphere of fear and intimidation on campus.

In the long run, the most direct method of defeating the inquisitors of political correctness is simply to stand up to them. Every act of resistance causes a ripple, encouraging others to stand up to ideological intimidation.

Radical Feminism and Political Correctness

Feminism was conceived and birthed in the 1830s, in the generation experiencing the first stage of the industrial revolution. Today, the feminisation of European culture continues to intensify. Indeed, the present-day radical feminist assault through support for mass Muslim immigration has a political parallel to the their anti-colonial efforts. This current assault is in part a continuation of a century-old effort to destroy the foundation of European culture.

The radical feminists have embraced and been embraced by the wider and deeper movement of cultural Marxism. For dedicated Marxists, the strategy is to attack at every point where an apparent disparity leaves a potential constituency of "oppressed" victim groups.

The concept of the "authoritarian personality" is a model for psychological warfare against the European male, to render him unwilling to defend traditional beliefs and values.

Critical theory as applied mass psychology has led to the deconstruction of gender in European culture. Children are not to be raised according to their biological genders. This reflects the Frankfurt School rationale for the disintegration of the traditional family.

The Marxist movement is sweeping all before it. With its sway over the media, fully in the grip of feminism, it is hard to discern the stirrings of a counter-culture. The New Totalitarians are the most dangerous generation in Western history. Not only have they managed to destroy fundamental structures of European society, they are allowing millions of Muslims to colonise Europe.

The fate of European civilisation depends on European men resisting Politically Correct feminism and opposing the wider grip of Political Correctness.

Book 1

History, Marxism and Islam

(page 38 of 1518)

1.1 Historical Revisionism

A lot of people believe that Christianity still is and was as evil as Islam. This is absolutely incorrect. For century after century, Islam was an enormous threat to what might loosely be called Christendom. It shaped every aspect of European history and was directly responsible for Europe's colonial empires.

Western European governments have sanctioned deleting and ignoring large chunks of our history, including censorships of school curricula on genocides, jihads, torture and enslavement of Christians and other non-Muslim peoples, and the truth about the Crusades.

Eurabian cooperation between European and Arab specialists present a positive picture of Arab-Islamic civilisation and contemporary Arab issues to the educated public in Europe.

1.2 European Islamic Negationism

Europe has its own brand of negationism: a movement to deny the crimes against humanity committed by Islam. This movement is led by Islamic apologists and Marxist academics, and followed by all the politicians, journalists and intellectuals who call themselves secularists.

Now that Islamic studies departments in Europe are increasingly manned by Muslims and sponsored by Islamic foundations and states, the climate for critical studies of Islam is only worsening.

British cooperation with the Indian Muslims is epitomised by the founding in 1906 of the Muslim League, which sought to "inculcate loyalty to the British Empire in the Indian Muslims". In French West Africa, in the same period, Islam was accepted as a factor of social stability. In the 1930s, Italian Fascists actively supported the spread of Islam in the Horn of Africa.

The Church is aware of the similarity between Jesus' and Mohammed's missions, so that a criticism of the foundations of Islam may backfire on Christianity. Christian pastors are the most fervent pleaders for the rights of Islam. Islam has become a sister religion regularly praised as a religion of peace.

Negationism in Europe is practised with the most prowess by historians and writers who are under the spell of Marxism. Lenin had wanted to use the Muslims against the French and British colonialists. Modern Leftists with Marxist sympathies see Islam as an ally against Israel and the United States.

1.3 The Failure of Western Universities
By Fjordman

London's School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) issued a threat to a Jewish student to cease his protests against antisemitism. Gavin Gross had been leading a campaign against deteriorating conditions for Jewish students at SOAS, which is part of the University of London. Its Islamic Society screened a video that compared Judaism with Satanism.

Saudis and other oil-rich Arabs are busy buying influence over what Westerners hear about Islam. Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al-Saud, a member of the Saudi Royal Family, is known in the USA for a $10 million check he offered to New York City Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani in October 2001 for the Twin Towers Fund. Mayor Giuliani returned the gift when he learned that the prince had called for the United States to "reexamine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance toward the Palestinian cause."

Harvard University and Georgetown University received $20 million donations from Prince bin Talal to finance Islamic studies. "For a university with global aspirations, it is critical that Harvard have a strong program on Islam that is worldwide and interdisciplinary in scope," said Steven E. Hyman, Harvard's provost. Georgetown said it would use the gift to expand its Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding.

It is difficult to understand why American or Western authorities still allow the Saudis to fund what is being taught about Islam to future Western leaders, years after several Saudi nationals staged the worst terror attack in Western history. The Saudis are enemies. It is a matter of national security.

From a report by The American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) on US Universities: "Throughout the humanities and social sciences, the same issues surface over and over, regardless of discipline. ... In short, the message is that the status quo, which is patriarchal, racist, hegemonic, and capitalist, must be interrogated and critiqued as a means of theorising and facilitating a social transformation whose necessity and value are taken as a given."

We may never fully reach the ideal of objective truth, but this does not mean that we should abandon the ideal. That's what has happened during the past decades. Western universities have moved from the Age of Reason to the Age of Deconstruction.

1.4 Religion of Peace? Islam's war against the world

Islam 101

The Christian, Jewish, and Zoroastrian peoples of the Middle East, North Africa, and much of Europe suffered under the oppressive strictures of the dhimma for centuries. The status of these dhimmi peoples is comparable in many ways to that of former slaves in the post-bellum American South.

1.5 Religious/political deception

Due to the state of ware between dar al-Islam and dar al-harb, systematic lying to the infidel must be considered part and parcel of Islamic tactics.

1.6 Quranic abrogation

Dhimmitude in Spain (Iberian peninsula)

The Iberian peninsula was conquered in 710-716 CE by Arab tribes originating from northern, central and southern Arabia. Massive Berber and Arab immigration, and the colonisation of the Iberian peninsula, followed the conquest. Most churches were converted into mosques. Although the conquest had been planned and conducted jointly with a faction of Iberian Christian dissidents, including a bishop, it proceeded as a classical jihad with massive pillages, enslavements, deportations and killings.

Moses Maimonides is frequently referred to as a paragon of Jewish achievement facilitated by the enlightened rule of Andalusia. But his own words debunk this utopian view of the Islamic treatment of Jews: "The Arabs have persecuted us severely, and passed baneful and discriminatory legislation against us ... Never did a nation molest, degrade, debase, and hate us as much as they."

Following its defeat at the walls of Vienna in 1683, Islam entered a period of strategic decline in which it was increasingly dominated by the rising European colonial powers. Due to its material weakness vis-ŕ-vis the West, dar al-Islam was unable to prosecute large-scale military campaigns into infidel territory. The Islamic Empire, then ruled by the Ottoman Turks, was reduced to fending of the increasingly predatory European powers.

Islamic sources make clear that engaging in violence against non-Muslims is a central and indispensable principle to Islam. Islam is less a personal faith than a political ideology that exists in a fundamental and permanent state of war with non-Islamic civilisations, cultures, and individuals. The Islamic holy texts outline a social, governmental, and economic system for all mankind. Those cultures and individuals who do not submit to Islamic governance exist in an ipso facto state of rebellion with Allah and must be forcibly brought into submission.

Muhammad Taqi Partovi Samzevari, in his Future of the Islamic Movement (1986), sums up the Islamic worldview:

"A people that is not prepared to kill and to die in order to create a just society cannot expect any support from Allah. The Almighty has promised us that the day will come when the whole of mankind will live united under the banner of Islam, when the sign of the Crescent, the symbol of Muhammad, will be supreme everywhere. ... But that day must be hastened through our Jihad, through our readiness to offer our lives and to shed the unclean blood of those who do not see the light brought from the Heavens by Muhammad."

The Crusades

In geo-strategic terms, the Crusades can be viewed as an attempt by the West to forestall its own destruction at the hands of Islamic jihad by carrying the fight to the enemy. It worked for a while. Significantly, while the West has for some time now lamented the Crusades as mistaken, there has never been any mention from any serious Islamic authority of regret for the centuries and centuries of jihad and dhimmitude perpetrated against other societies. But this is hardly surprising: while religious violence contradicts the fundamentals of Christianity, religious violence is written into Islam's DNA.

Following the defeat of the Ottoman army outside Vienna on September 11, 1683, by Polish forces, Islam went into a period of strategic decline in which it was overwhelmingly dominated by the European powers. Much of dar al-Islam was colonised by the European powers who employed their superior technology and exploited the rivalries within the Muslim world to establish colonial rule.

When one looks at the post-colonial world, it is apparent that the most successful postcolonial nations have a common attribute: they are not Muslim. The United States, Australia, Hong Kong, Israel, India, and the South American nations clearly outshine their Muslim-majority post-colonial counterparts — Iraq, Algeria, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, etc. — by just about any standard.

1.7 Islam – What the West needs to know

The tendency of western political leaders to deny the connection between the orthodox Islamic mainstream and terrorist violence is replicated in universities and the media wherever you look both in Western Europe and North America.

Muslim advocates will say Islam forbids suicide, but all the defenders of suicide bombings in the Islamic world start out by saying this is not suicide. The intention of the person is not to kill himself. The intention of the person is to kill others. And that is sanctioned because it is Islamic Jihad. And if they in the process are killed themselves, that's an unavoidable consequence of their actions and they will be rewarded with the reward of martyrs in paradise. The guarantees of paradise are for people who are killed while they are killing to establish the hegemony of Allah or Islamic law in the world. Jihad in Islam means struggle.

Serge Trifkovic
The Crusades of 1095-1270 AD are not understood in the Muslim world today very differently to the way they are understood in the Western academia and among the Western elite class. Both talk of the Crusades as an aggressive war of conquest by Christian Europe against peaceful innocent Muslims. One may ask however what those Muslims were doing in the holy land in the first place. What happened was that Muhammad and his successors laid a series of wars of conquest and in one such onslaught in 624 AD the holy land was conquered by Muslims.

Robert Spencer
On September 11th, 1683, the siege of Vienna was broken. That was the high point of Islamic Jihad expansion into Europe. After that, Islam went into a decline and the Islamic world was colonised and in a drastically weakened state. It seems very likely, almost certain as far as I’m concerned, that Osama Bin Laden chose September 11 in 2001 to signal that the decline of the Islamic world was over and that the Jihadists were back and that they were going to pick up where they left of in Vienna in 1683.

Serge Trifkovic
If we look at the tectonic plates between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world today, we notice something very interesting: even very diverse Muslim societies which cannot be easily branded under one civilisation label have something in common, and it is the tendency that they are in conflict with their neighbours.

War is Deceit

Serge Trifkovic
The spokesman for Islam in the Western world knows how to play the game. They know how to present their cause in a way that is not only regarded as acceptable by the society mainstream but also reasonable and just. They will appeal to democratic institutions and their human rights in the full knowledge that given the power to do so, they will abolish those institutions and deny those rights to others.

Robert Spencer
Edward Said wrote that criticism of the Islamic world on the part of Westerners was racist and imperialist. Islam is the religion of peace. This fiction has become so entrenched in American and European public discourse that anyone who questions it is immediately branded as a racist, a hate monger and a bigot.

More than a Religion

Serge Trifkovic
It would be incorrect to describe Islam primarily as a religion. Since its early beginning in Muhammad's lifetime it has also been a geopolitical project and a system of government and a political ideology.

Robert Spencer
Islam from its beginnings was both a religion and a system of government. In the Islamic calendar, year 1 is from the time that Muhammad became the leader of an army and a head of state in Medina. This is the beginning of the Islamic calendar because in the Islamic understanding Islam is a political and social system as well as an individual faith.

Serge Trifkovic
In Islam the separation between temporal secular and religious power is not only impossible, it is heretical. Only in the complete blending of all aspects of human activity and all aspects of political and legal functions of the state can we have the Caliphate, the properly organised state that is pleasing to Allah.

Walid Shoebat
Islam is not a religion for personal use. Islam is Sharia law, Islam is a form of government to the world, and only then a personal application. It is not just how you pray and that you pray towards Mecca. You dress in Arab culture, you speak Arabic, you can't go to heaven unless you pray in Arabic, you read the Quran in Arabic. It becomes an imperialistic system. Everything is Islam.

Robert Spencer
In no way is Islamic Sharia, Islamic government compatible with Western understandings of human rights and freedom of conscience. Traditional Islam forbids conversion from Islam and forbids anyone to leave Islam. There is no way out. It forbids Muslims and non-Muslims to live as equals in society. It mandates the second class status (dhimmi) of non-Muslims, forbidding them to hold authority over Muslims thus forbidding them to hold certain jobs as a result.

Serge Trifkovic
It is not possible for a non-Muslim living in a Muslim society to invoke his civil rights and human rights that would be independent or separate from the Sharia concept. He is expected to submit to Sharia willingly, and if he accepts his Dhimmitude he will be a protected person. A protected person is someone who is in fact a willing subordinate to the Muslim overlords.

Walid Shoebat
Muhammad very clearly said, which is documented through the Hadith, that: "I have been ordered to fight until everyone says that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah."

Robert Spencer
Muslims who come to the United States and come to Europe with an idea that Sharia is the law of Allah, they look upon our freedom of religion and they look upon the fact that non-Muslims are in power making laws that are not on the basis of the law of Allah but on the basis of consensus and free elections. They look upon all that as a manifestation of Jahelia or unbelief, the pre-Islamic period of ignorance, as the time in any nation's history before it became Muslim. Many Muslims coming into the United States and Western Europe will work to establish Islamic mechanisms of government here where the goal is to create Islamic states on the basis of the idea that secular states and the state based on elections has no legitimacy. You don’t have elections about the law of Allah, you simply obey what God says.

The House of War

Robert Spencer
Islam is a religion and a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society.

Walid Shoebat
Islamic fundamentalism in the West has a façade that Islam is a peaceful religion. Because they are waiting to have more Islamic immigrants, they are waiting to increase in number, waiting to increase their political power. Once they do, then history will repeat itself. You will see the real face of Islamic fundamentalism here in your country.

Robert Spencer
Islamic law does not allow for treaties. It does not allow for negotiated settlements between Muslim states and non-Muslim states. All it allows for is a temporary period of up to 10 years of hudna or what is commonly translated as truce. In a war that the Jihadists consider has gone on for 14 centuries and are willing to fight for 14 more.

Serge Trifkovic
In Islamic thinking the world is divided into the House of Islam, where Islamic law has been established, where Allah rules supreme, and the House of War, which is the rest of the world. It is possible to have peaceful co-existence, but that peaceful co-existence is a tactical ploy and not a permanent solution.

Robert Spencer
This is not a conflict that was created with the creation of the state of Israel or a conflict that was created when the American army went into Iraq. The global Jihad has been going on without any significant interruption since the 7th century. And it only declined in force and activity at periods when the Islamic world was too weak to prosecute it.

Bat Ye'or
Do we want to preserve our Judeao-Christian values and our own civilisation or do we want, do we choose to go towards a dhimmitude, an enlarged dhimmitude in Europe, which will engulf the whole of Europe?

Serge Trifkovic
Defending the West in the name of the ideology of multiculturalism would be impossible. Multiculturalism and post-modern liberalism are not worthy dying for.

1.8 European Slaves, Arab Masters
By Andrew G. Bostom

A public protest in Washington, DC, April 5, 2005 highlighted the current (ongoing, for centuries) plight of black Mauritanians enslaved by Arab masters. The final two decades of the 20th century, moreover, witnessed a frank jihad genocide, including mass enslavement, perpetrated by the Arab Muslim Khartoum government against black Christians and animists in the Southern Sudan.

The linkage between jihad and enslavement provides an explanation for the unparalleled scale and persistence of slavery in Muslim dominions, and societies. This general observation applies as well to 'specialised' forms of slavery, including the (procurement and) employment of eunuchs, slave soldiering (especially of adolescents), other forms of child slavery, and harem slavery. Jihad slavery, in its myriad manifestations, became a powerful instrument for both expansive Islamisation, and the maintenance of Muslim societies.

For the idolatrous Hindus, enslaved in vast numbers during the waves of jihad conquests that ravaged the Indian subcontinent for well over a half millennium (beginning at the outset of the 8th century CE), the guiding principles of Islamic law regarding their fate were unequivocally coercive. Jihad slavery also contributed substantively to the growth of the Muslim population in India.

Islamic slavery in Africa was comparable in scale and scope to the Western transatlantic slave trade to the Americas. Slavery was openly practiced in both Ottoman Turkey, and Shi'ite (Qajar) Iran, through the first decade of the 20th century. Slavery on the Arabian peninsula was not abolished formally until 1962 in Saudi Arabia.

1.9 Hindu Kush, the largest genocides in the history of man
By Shrinandan Vyas

Authorities agree that the Hindu Kush region is a place of Hindu genocide. The name 'Hindu Kush' of the mountain range in Eastern Afghanistan means 'Hindu Slaughter' or 'Hindu Killer'. Until 1000 CE the area of Hindu Kush was a full part of Hindu cradle. It seems likely that the range was deliberately named Hindu Kush by the Moslem conquerors, as a lesson to the future generations of Indians.

Afghanistan is now a Moslem country. Logically, this means one or more of the following must have happened: (a) the original residents of Hindu Kush converted to Islam, or (b) they were slaughtered and the conquerors took over, or (c) they were driven out.

The Indian Government has never demanded that the Afghan Government change such an insulting and barbaric name. But in July 1993 the government of India asked the visiting Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra to change its name because the word Jerusalem in its name is offensive to Moslem fundamentalists.

Although the Hindu Kush has been referred to as Hindu slaughter, it is obvious that it was really a Hindu and Buddhist slaughter. As the huge stone Buddhas of Bamian show, Buddhists were idol worshipers par excellence. Hence for Moslem invaders the Buddhists idol worshipers were equally deserving of punishment. The true depth of the Hindu genocide remains unknown.

1.10 Additional info — Hindu Kush

The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves.

But the Indian pagans were far too numerous and never fully surrendered. What some call the Muslim period in Indian history was in reality a continuous war of occupiers against resisters, in which the Muslim rulers were finally defeated in the 18th century.

In 1857, the near-defunct Muslim dynasties (Moghuls, Nawabs) tried to curry favour with their Hindu subjects and neighbours, in order to launch a joint effort to re-establish their rule. This is the only instance in modern history when Muslims offered concessions to the Hindus. After that, all the concessions made for the sake of communal harmony were a one-way traffic from Hindu to Muslim.

1.11 What the Crusades were really like

The Crusaders were not unprovoked aggressors, greedy marauders, or medieval colonialists, as portrayed in some history books. In fact, the Crusades were defensive wars, not wars of conquest.

From the time of Mohammed, Muslims had sought to conquer the Christian world. After a few centuries of steady conquests, Muslim armies had taken all of North Africa, the Middle East, Asia Minor and most of Spain. As far as unprovoked aggression goes, it was all on the Muslim side. At some point what was left of the Christian world had to defend itself or simply succumb to Islamic conquest.

1.12 The Crusades and today

Present-day tension between the West and Muslim countries has very little to do with the Crusades, says a historian. Thomas Madden, chair of the history department at St. Louis University and author of A Concise History of the Crusades, contends that, from the Muslim perspective, the Crusades were not worth noticing. That changed when 19th-century revisionists started to recast the Crusades as imperialist wars, he says.

1.13 The factors that led to the Crusades
By Lúcio Mascarenhas

Islam began as an overtly militant and aggressive cult in its fundamental and inherent nature, and remains so. The Crusades were subsequent to the Islamic aggressions and responses to them. The immediate provocation for the first crusade was the Islamic mistreatment of Christian pilgrims to Israel and attempts to deny Christians access to these sites.

1.14 Modern Aftermath of the Crusades
By Robert Spencer

The capture of Jerusalem is often portrayed as the cause of Muslim mistrust of the West. The Crusaders' sack of Jerusalem was a heinous crime, but by the military standards of the day, it was nothing out of the ordinary. Muslim armies frequently behaved in exactly the same way when entering a conquered city.

1.15 History of the Islamic Ottoman Turkish Empire

With the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923, an estimated 200 000 Greeks remained in Turkey following a population exchange. The Armenians were reduced from 2.5 million to around 150 000 after the genocide.

After 1945, in light of the Soviet domination over Eastern Europe, the United States supports Greece and Turkey with economic and military aid to prevent their falling into the Soviet sphere.

Cyprus was declared an independent state in 1960 with Archbishop Makarios as President and a constitution with equal Turkish governance. Turkish Cypriots saw themselves as Turks living in Cyprus rather than Turkish Cypriots. The Zurich and London agreements granted the Turkish Cypriot community political rights disproportionate their numbers. A 1960 census in Cyprus showed that Greek Cypriots comprised 77% and Turkish Cypriots 18%.

In 1987, Turkey submitted its application for formal membership into the European Community. It was refused, citing Turkey's economic and political situation, poor relations with Greece and the conflict with Cyprus.

Turkey restricts religious rights of Christians and converts. Their murder is indirectly encouraged. Millions of Kurds, Assyrians, Alevies, Yezidies and other minorities have no status. Women in Turkey are often subjected to "honour" killings and employment discrimination. Turkey occupies 37% of Cyprus and refuses to recognise the Republic of Cyprus.

1.16 Institutionalised rape of Christians under the Ottoman Empire

The historical acceptance of rape may have influenced the incidence of rape in the wars of the last decade in former Yugoslavia. The use or misuse of Serb and other Christian minority women by Muslim men has been a major source of grievance. Polygamy and concubinage by Muslim men resulted in wives and concubines being taken from the Christian population as well as the Muslim one. The janissary in charge of an estate or the local landlord had the right to the virginity of all brides among Serb and other serfs.

1.17 Jihadi Genocides of Christians in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey

Armenian Genocide (1915-1918) — Over 1 500 000 deaths

The genocide of the Armenians was a jihad. Despite the disapproval of many Muslim Turks and Arabs, and their refusal to collaborate in the crime, these massacres were perpetrated solely by Muslims and they alone profited from the booty.

Those involved in the mass murder showed little interest in stopping to dig graves. The roadside corpses and emaciated deportees were a shocking sight to foreigners working in Turkey. Eyewitnesses included German government liaisons, American missionaries, and U.S. diplomats stationed in the country. The U.S. ambassador to Turkey, Henry Morgenthau, reported to Washington: "When the Turkish authorities gave the orders for these deportations, they were merely giving the death warrant to a whole race."

When World War I ended, representatives from the fledgling Republic of Armenia attended the Paris Peace Conference in the hope that the victorious Allies would give them back their historic lands seized by Turkey. The European Allies asked the United States to assume guardianship of the new Republic. The Treaty of Sevres was signed in 1920 by the Allied Powers, the Republic of Armenia, and the new moderate leaders of Turkey. The treaty recognised an independent Armenian state.

Turkish nationalism once again reared its head. The new nationalist leader, Mustafa Kemal, refused to accept the treaty, re-occupied the lands in question, and expelled any surviving Armenians.

No Allied power came to the aid of the Armenian republic and it collapsed. After the obliteration of the people of historic Armenia during the Armenian genocide, the Turks demolished any remnants of their cultural heritage. Even today, the United States, Great Britain, Turkey and the rest of the Muslim World have refused to recognise the Armenian Genocide.

Greek Jihadi Genocide (1914-23)

During the years 1914-1923, the indigenous Greek minority of the Ottoman Empire was subjected to a centrally organised, premeditated and systematic policy of annihilation. A lethal combination of internal deportations involving death marches, forced conversions to Islam, torture, mutilation, rape, enslavement and massacres conducted throughout Ottoman Turkey resulted in the death of one million Ottoman Greeks. The present estimate is that some 1 400 000 Greeks of all ages were killed during that period. The Turkish functionaries, with German approval, declared that no Christian should be left alive in Turkey unless he consented to embrace Mohammedanism.

Assyrian Jihadi Genocide (1914-1920)

Genocide was committed against the Assyrian and Syriac Christians of the Ottoman Empire near the end of the First World War by the leadership of the Young Turks party. Scholars have placed the number of Assyrian victims at 500 000 to 750 000.

1.18 Turkey: Back to the Future?
By Andrew G. Bostom

Turks are seeking to join the European Union (EU). Recently, security analyst Frank Gaffney wrote an essay urging that Turkey's bid to join the EU be rejected.

The essay elaborates on Jihad and dhimmitude under the Ottomans; the failure of the Ottoman Tanzimat reforms to abrogate the system of dhimmitude; and the dissolution of this Sharia state whose collapse during the first World War included a jihad genocide of an Ottoman dhimmi population, the Armenians.

An influential member of the Ottoman Committee of Union and Progress, Sheik Abd-ul-Hack, a progressive Young Turk, made this revealing declaration writing in a Parisian Muslim review in August, 1912:

"The Musulman religion is in open hostility to all your world of progress. Understand, you European observers, that a Christian, whatever his position may be, by the mere fact of his being a Christian is regarded by us as a blind man lost to all sense of human dignity. Our reasoning with regard to him is as simple as it is definitive. We say: the man whose judgment is so perverted as to deny the existence of a one and only God, and to make up gods of different sorts, can only be the meanest expression of human degradation; to speak to him would be a humiliation for our intelligence and an insult to the grandeur of the Master of the Universe. The presence of such miscreants among us is the bane of our existence; their doctrine is a direct insult to the purity of our faith; contact with them is a defilement of our bodies; any relation with them a torture to our souls."

Enforced abrogation of the laws of dhimmitude required the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire. This finally occurred after the Balkan wars of independence, and during the European Mandate period following World War I.

The present Prime Minister Erdogan's efforts to re-Islamise Turkey are consistent with a return to Turkey's Ottoman past as the heartland of an empire established by jihad and governed by sharia.

1.19 The fall of the Christian state of Lebanon

Lebanese Christians, who constitute the only influential Christian community in the Middle East, are fast declining in numbers and power, in favour of the Muslim majority.

Advent of Islam and Christians of the East
By Dr. George Khoury, Catholic Information Network (CIN)

During his lifetime, Muhammad reacted differently at different times to Jews and Christians depending on the reception they accorded him and also on his dealings with Christian states.

During the period of two hundred years following Muhammad's death, the attitude of Islam to Christianity remained generally similar to what it had been during the closing years of the prophet's life. Christianity was regarded as parallel to Islam, but corrupt. To this extent, Islam was superior.

1.20 Battle of Poitiers (Battle of Tours) — First Islamic wave — Year 732

The Battle of Tours (October 10, 732) pitted Frankish and Burgundian forces under Charles Martel against an army of the Umayyad Caliphate. The Franks were victorious and Charles subsequently extended his authority in the south. Ninth-century chroniclers gave Charles the nickname Martellus - the Hammer.

Historians began to characterise this battle as being the decisive turning point in the struggle against Islam, a struggle which preserved Christianity as the religion of Europe.

It appears as if the Umayyads were not aware of the true strength of the Franks. The Umayyad forces were not particularly concerned about any of the Germanic tribes, including the Franks. Arab awareness of the Franks as a growing military power only came after the Battle of Tours.

Given the disparity between the armies, in that the Franks were mostly infantry, against Berber cavalry and armoured or mailed Arab horsemen, Charles Martel fought a brilliant defensive battle. In a place and time of his choosing, he met a far superior force, and defeated it.

The battle of Tours is one of the decisive battles of the world. It decided that Christians, and not Moslems, should be the ruling power in Europe. Charles Martel's victory over the Arabs stemmed the tide of their westward advance. He went on to clear southern France from Islamic attackers for decades.

1.21 Battle of Vienna — Second Islamic wave — Year 1683

The Battle of Vienna took place on 11-12 September, 1683 after Vienna had been besieged by the Ottoman Empire for two months. The battle broke the advance of the Ottoman Empire into Europe and marked the political hegemony of the Habsburg dynasty in Central Europe.

The Turks lost at least 15 000 men dead and wounded in the fighting, plus at least 5 000 men captured and all cannons, compared to approximately 4 500 dead and wounded for the Habsburg-Polish forces.

Austria signed a peace treaty with the Ottoman Empire in 1697. The Ottomans fought on for another 16 years, losing control of Hungary and Transylvania in the process, before finally giving up. The end of the conflict was finalised by the Treaty of Karlowitz.

1.22 The Twelfth Viking
By Baron Bodissey

At the Battle of Poitiers in 732, the Frankish king Charles Martel defeated the Saracens and pushed the forces of Islam back into the Iberian Peninsula. It was not until 1492 that the Moors were finally thrown out of Europe, but in the meantime the Islamic virus was contained in Spain and Portugal, and thus kept out of the heart of Western Europe.

One of Charles Martel's comrades-in-arms at Poitiers was a warrior of the North known as Holger the Dane. At the end of his days, Holger retired to a secluded keep to enter a twilight sleep from which he will awake in the hour of his country’s need. The location most frequently cited for Holger's rest is Kronborg castle at Helsingřr (Elsinore).

1.23 Western vs. Islamic science and religion
By Fjordman

Nobody talks about Buddhist science or Christian science, so I so no reason why we should use the term "Islamic science" either. The term "Arab science" is hardly better.

By the end of the eleventh century, Western Europeans were aware that both Muslims and Byzantines had access to philosophical and scientific texts that they did not have. After the capture of Toledo, Spain and Sicily from the Muslims in 1085 and 1091, respectively, a number of scholars translated Greek and Arabic texts. The result was a lot of translations in the twelfth and thirteenth century.

Many works in optics, astronomy, medicine and mathematics were translated, but it was Aristotle's work on natural philosophy that had the greatest impact.

Greek logic and natural philosophy were never fully accepted in the Islamic world, and what initial acceptance there had been was largely nullified by the extremely influential Muslim theologian al-Ghazali (1058-1111 C.E.). Al-Ghazali regarded theology and natural philosophy as dangerous to the Islamic faith and was skeptical of the concept of mathematical proof.

French thinker Remi Brague claims that Muslims largely lacked the European instinct for self-criticism and appreciation of others. They did translate works from Greek and other languages like Sanskrit and Persian, but they usually didn't preserve the originals. This made going back to the sources to reinterpret them impossible in the Islamic world.

Logic continued to be used as an ancillary subject in scholastic theology (kalam) and in many Islamic religious schools, but there was enough hostility toward philosophy to prompt philosophers to keep a low profile.

This situation was radically different in the Latin West. There was sporadic opposition to the use of reason and one attempt to ban the works of Aristotle at the University of Paris in the thirteenth century, but this was of brief duration and eventually failed. There were no later attempts to ban the use of logic and natural philosophy.

Islam is in principle a theocracy in which religion and state form a single entity. Islamic schools, or madrasas, generally taught "Islamic science," that is theology, Arabic grammar, the Koran and the hadith etc. Greek and other non-Muslim philosophy was called "foreign sciences" and was never integrated into the core curriculum.

The European university system had no real equivalent in any other major civilisation in the world at the time. Nothing like it existed in the Islamic world. Universities could only be established in Spain and Portugal after these countries had been re-conquered by the Christians.

At the beginning of the 21st century, Western universities seem to be increasingly preoccupied with deconstructing their own civilisation and praising the most barbaric cultures and regimes on earth. There has been a decline in free inquiry and good scholarship.

1.24 Historically — Bosnia is Serbian Land

South Slavs settled in the Balkans in the 7th century. The two largest tribes were Serbs and Croats. To this day the two people speak one and the same language. Until recently the language was known as Serbo-Croatian. The only outwardly difference between Serbs and Croats today is that the former are Orthodox while the later are Catholic Christians.

1.25 Who are the Bosniaks?

The natives of Bosnia and Herzegovina are officially described as Bosniaks, but classify themselves according to religion. All alike belong to the Serbo-Croatian branch of the Slavonic race, and all speak a language almost identical to Serbian, though written by the Roman Catholics in Latin instead of Cyrillic letters.

The Mohammedan religion is not a religion in the Christian sense of involving principally the problems of morality, spiritual growth, and immortality. Mohammedanism is a state of society founded on a collection of laws and legal principles dealing with and ruling every event of individual and public life.

Where Islam is master, no other civil status is recognised except in tolerance and in subordination to Islam. There can be no assimilation with people of other creeds or civilisation.

As the central rule in the Ottoman Empire was dying out, Janissaries governed Bosnia. They were oppressive and cruel. When Great Britain insisted that Turkish sultan should give equal rights to his Christian subjects, the Janissaries of Bosnia started a rebellion to topple the sultan.

1.26 Historical Islamic demographic warfare in Kosovo
By M. Bozinovich

Kosovo has an Albanian majority, hence it should be either given to Albania or granted international recognition as an independent state.

1.27 Origin or the myth of a tolerant pluralistic Islamic society
By Bat Ye'or

In my 1991 book, I tried to analyze the numerous processes that had transformed rich, powerful Christian civilisations into Islamic lands and their long-term effects, which had reduced native Christian majorities into scattered small religious minorities, now slowly disappearing.

This complex Islamisation process of Christian lands and civilisations on both shores of the Mediterranean, and in Iraq and Armenia, I have called the process of dhimmitude and the civilisation of those peoples who underwent such transformation, I have named the civilisation of dhimmitude. The indigenous native peoples were Jews and Christians: Orthodox, Catholics, or from other Eastern Christian Churches. They are all referred to by Muslim jurists as the Peoples of the Book and are called dhimmis: protected peoples, because Islamic law protects their life and goods on condition that they submit to Islamic rule.

The civilisation of dhimmitude does not develop all at once. It is a long process that involves many elements and a specific conditioning. It happens when peoples replace history by myths, when they fight to uphold these destructive myths more then their own values because they are confused by having transformed lies into truth. They hold to those myths as if they were the only guarantee of their survival, when, in fact, they are the path to destruction.

1.28 Palestine for the Syrians?

There is no such thing as a Palestinian people. Before 1948, they were referred to as Syrians. Creating a separate Palestinian state is as ridiculous as creating a separate state called Kosovo.

1.29 Historical acts of high treason by European governments

Nations who act in accordance with their own short term goals alone show no consideration for historical perspectives. Where there should be a joint anti-Jihad action by the affected nations there is just short term self-interest.

1.30 Further studies
There are a great number of books in print relating to the Templars, past Crusades, and medieval history.

Book 2

Europe Burning

(page 280 of 1518)

2.1 EU's Eurabia Project

Eurabia: Arab League states, current and prospective European Union members and Israel.
By Fjordman

What follows is a brief outline of the thesis put forward by writer Bat Ye'or in her book Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis.

Bat Ye'or: "European leaders have decided on an alliance with the Arab world, through which they have committed to accept the Arab and Muslim approach toward the United States and Israel. This is not only with respect to foreign policy, but also on issues engaging European society from within, such as immigration, the integration of the immigrants and the idea that Islam is part of Europe."

The Eurabian project facilitated European ambitions to maintain spheres of influence in the former European colonies, while opening huge markets for European products in the Arab world, especially in oil-producing countries, in order to secure supplies of petroleum and natural gas to Europe.

The Arab states demanded from Europe access to Western science and technology, European political independence from the United States, European pressure on the United States to align with their Arab policy and demonisation of Israel as a threat to world peace, as well as measures favorable to Arab immigration and dissemination of Islamic culture in Europe.

The Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation was created in Paris in 1974 and now has over six hundred members from all major European political parties.

Euro-Arab Dialogue (EAD) symposia conducted in Venice (1977) and Hamburg (1983) included recommendations that were accompanied by a deliberate, privileged influx of Arab and other Muslim immigrants into Europe in enormous numbers.

A complete rewriting of history was ratified by the parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe in September 1991, at its meeting devoted to "The Contribution of the Islamic Civilisation to European culture." A Foundation on the Dialogue of Cultures and Civilisations was to control everything said, written and taught about Islam in Europe.

Over the past three decades, EEC and the EU political and cultural organisations have invented a fantasy Islamic civilisation and history. The historical record of violations of basic human rights for all non-Muslims and women under sharia is either ignored or dismissed.

The new European civilisation in the making can be termed a ''civilisation of dhimmitude.'' Dhimmitude is the status of subjugated, non-Muslim individuals who accept restrictive and humiliating subordination to Islamic power in order to avoid enslavement or death. The entire Muslim world as we know it today is a product of this 1,300 year-old jihad dynamic, whereby once thriving non-Muslim majority civilisations have been reduced to a state of dysfunction and dhimmitude. Dhimmis are inferior beings who endure humiliation and aggression in silence. Muslims enjoy impunity under sharia.

Eurabia possesses political, economic, religious, cultural, and media components, which are imposed on Europe by powerful governmental lobbies. Dissidents are silenced or boycotted. Sometimes they are fired from their jobs, victims of a totalitarian "correctness" imposed mainly by the academic, media and political sectors.

Are Bat Ye'or's claims correct, or even possible?

Richard North and Christopher Booker call the European Union "a slow-motion coup d'état: the most spectacular coup d'état in history," designed to gradually and carefully sideline the democratic process and subdue the older nation states of Europe without saying so publicly.

Eurabia is now French domestic policy. France will burn unless she continues to appease Arabs and agree to their agenda. The growth of the Islamic population is explosive. According to some, one out of three babies born in France is a Muslim. Hundreds of Muslim ghettos already de facto follow sharia, not French law. Some believe France will quietly become a Muslim country, while others are predicting a civil war in the near future.

MEDEA (the European Institute for Research on Mediterranean and Euro-Arab Cooperation), supported by the European Commission, is one of the key components of the Euro-Arab dialogue. On its own webpage, it states that:
"The Euro-Arab Dialogue as a forum shared by the European Community and the League of Arab States arose out of a French initiative and was launched at the European Council in Copenhagen in December 1973."

In December 2003, Javier Solana, the Secretary General of the Council of the European Union, Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission and Chris Patten, member of the European Commission, signed a plan for "Strengthening the EU's Partnership with the Arab World." This includes the creation of a free trade area, but also plans to "invigorate cultural/religious/civilisation and media dialogue using existing or planned instruments, including the planned Euro-Mediterranean Foundation for the Dialogue of Cultures and Civilisations."

Serge Trifkovic: "The present technological, cultural and financial strength of Europe is a façade that conceals a deep underlying moral and demographic weakness. The symptoms of the malaise are apparent in the unprecedented demographic collapse and in the loss of a sense of place and history that go hand-in-hand with the expansion of the European Union. The emerging transnational hyper-state is actively indoctrinating its subject-population into believing and accepting that the demographic shift in favor of Muslim aliens is actually a blessing."

The Muslim Brotherhood was founded by Hassan al-Banna in 1928. Banna: "We want the flag of Islam to fly over those lands again who were lucky enough to be ruled by Islam for a time, and hear the call of the muezzin praise God. Then the light of Islam died out and they returned to disbelief. Andalusia, Sicily, the Balkans, Southern Italy and the Greek islands are all Islamic colonies which have to return to Islam's embrace. The Mediterranean and the Red Sea have to become internal seas of Islam, as they used to be."

A document called "The Project" was a 14-page plan written in Arabic and dated December 1, 1982, which outlined a 12-point strategy to "establish an Islamic government on earth". The Project has served for more than two decades as the Muslim Brotherhood "master plan." Some of it recommendations include:
— Using deception to mask the intended goals of Islamist actions — Building extensive social networks of schools, hospitals and charitable organisations — Involving ideologically committed Muslims in institutions on all levels in the West — Instrumentally using existing Western institutions until they can be put into service of Islam — Instituting alliances with Western "progressive" organisations that share similar goals

The current leader of the international Muslim Brotherhood, Mohammad Mahdi Akef, recently issued a new strategy calling on all its member organisations to serve its global agenda of defeating the West. Akef: "I have complete faith that Islam will invade Europe and America."

Islamic groups in the West are buying large amounts of real estate, territory that effectively becomes "Muslim" land once it is in the hands of Islamist groups. Some groups are signing agreements to guarantee that they will only sell the land to other Muslims. The Brotherhood is active in investments in properties and businesses across Europe.

The tentacles of the vast, inflated EU bureaucracy insinuate themselves into regulations on every conceivable subject. Some of the examples of the bureaucracy are ridiculous, some are sinister:
— Promotion of an official, "EU federal ideology" advocating multiculturalism — Denunciation as "xenophobes" all those who want to preserve national democracy — Calling those who would limit Third World immigration "racists"

Early in 2006, the EU human rights commissioner Alvaro Gil-Robles said: "Religion as a school subject should be a general course that attempts to give students insight into the three monotheistic religions," namely Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

There are several possible ways of dealing with education about religion:
— Teach the traditional religions in Europe, namely Christianity and Judaism — Teach all the major world religions — Leave religion out of the curriculum

The European Union treats Islam as a European religion on par with Christianity and Judaism. This is a crucial component of Eurabian thinking and practice. EU authorities didn't ask for more teaching of Buddhism or Hinduism. Only Islam is being pushed.

People who have grown up in former Communist countries say that they see this same totalitarian impulse at work in Western Europe now. According to them, we in the West are at least as brainwashed by multiculturalism and Political Correctness as they ever were with communism.

The EU federalists and Eurabians have taken a page out of the Islamic playbook, and have been approaching their goals by stealth for decades, buried beneath a mass of detail and technocratic newspeak all but incomprehensible to non-bureaucrats.

The European Union has been compared to the Roman Empire, but such comparisons are inept. Rome was the military superpower of its time, while the EU is a military midget.

The EU is an organisation where unelected bureaucrats dismantle democracy, yet denounce their critics as anti-democratic forces. In order to create this new entity, the old nation states must be deliberately crushed. Massive numbers of non-European immigrants are introduced, and the resulting situation is termed a "multicultural society".

The nation state itself has been declared evil or obsolete. If a small group of people sideline the democratic process in one country and start imposing their own laws on the public, it's called a coup d'état. If they do so on an entire continent, it's called the European Union.

2.2 The Eurabia Code – 2008 updates
By Fjordman

European leaders are increasingly open about the idea of enlarging the EU to include the Arab world. They do not present this as surrendering the continent to Islam. We are sheep and constitute no threat while they must continue appeasing the Muslims.

Western European governments, giving in to pressure from Arab terrorists and oil-producing states, abandoned their traditional pro-Israeli position and gradually aligned themselves with the Arab-Islamic world. European governments have agreed to pay Arabs, large sums in "protection money" to reduce the terrorist threat. This can only be seen as jizya, and the practice has later spread to the entire European Union.

The European Union has accepted that the union should be enlarged to include the Muslim Middle East and North Africa. The EU has accepted that tens of millions of immigrants from predominantly Muslim countries in northern Africa should be allowed to settle in Europe in the years ahead. This is supposedly "good for the economy." It is planning to implement sharia laws for the millions of Muslims it is inviting to settle in Europe. It has passed stronger anti-racism laws while making it clear that "Islamophobia" constitutes a form of racism, and is cooperating with Islamic countries on rewriting school textbooks to provide a "positive" image of Islam to European children.

The European Union is formally surrendering an entire continent to Islam while destroying established national cultures, and is prepared to harass those who disagree with this policy. This constitutes the greatest organised betrayal in Western history.

The European Union — or the Eurabian Empire if you will — is a naked power grab by the elites in order to dismantle the nations there are supposed to serve.

Europeans should work to get rid of the culture of betrayal. We also need to get rid of the culture of appeasement. No money for the Palestinians. If they need money, they can ask the Saudis.

2.3 Ten reasons to get rid of the European Union

1. The EU promotes crime and instability
2. The EU weakens Europe’s cultural defences
3. The EU promotes a bloated bureaucracy
4. Excessive regulation and centralization is bad for freedom and prosperity
5. The lack of a real separation of powers in the EU invites abuse of power
6. The lack of transparency leaves the EU vulnerable to hostile infiltration
7. The EU leads to less freedom of speech
8. The EU fails to consult its citizens and insults them when doing so
9. The EU undermines political legitimacy and connections between rulers and the ruled
10. The EU spreads a culture of lies and corruption

2.4 Why the EU needs to be destroyed, and soon
By Fjordman

Many Americans, and Europeans, too, have more or less written off Western Europe as lost to Islam already. I see encouraging signs of a real shift of public opinion beneath the surface. Judging from information such as the extremely high number of Germans hostile to Islam, I still hope that Europe can be saved. But this hope hinges on the destruction of the European Union.

Roger Scruton: "We in Europe stand at a turning point in our history. Our parliaments and legal systems still have territorial sovereignty. They still correspond to historical patterns of settlement that have enabled the French, the Germans, the Spaniards, the British and the Italians to say 'we' and to know whom they mean by it. The opportunity remains to recuperate the legislative powers and the executive procedures that formed the nation states of Europe. At the same time, the process has been set in motion that would expropriate the remaining sovereignty of our parliaments and courts, that would annihilate the boundaries between our jurisdictions, that would dissolve the nationalities of Europe in a historically meaningless collectivity, united neither by language, nor by religion, nor by customs, nor by inherited sovereignty and law."

Europe has got itself into a bad fix, again, and will have some turbulent and painful years and decades ahead.

The creation of Eurabia is the greatest act of treason in the history of Western civilisation for two thousand years. The EU elites want to recreate the Roman Empire on both sides of the Mediterranean. Instead, they are creating a civilisational breakdown across much of Western Europe as the barbarians are overrunning the continent. Eurabia can only be derailed by destroying the European Union.

2.5 Boycott the United Nations!
By Fjordman

The United Nation Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon condemned Wilder's movie Fitna as "offensively anti-Islamic," and said "There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence." Does that mean that the UN is now going to ban the Koran, which does both?

Earlier, the U.N. Human Rights Council passed a resolution saying it is deeply concerned about the defamation of religions and urging governments to prohibit it. The only religion specified is Islam. The document was put forward by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, the largest voting bloc at the UN, sponsored by Saudi money.

Freedom includes free speech. Muslims are trying to use the UN to limit free speech across the world.

The best way to deal with the Islamic world is to have as little to do with it as possible. We should ban Muslim immigration, remove all Muslim non-citizens currently in the West, and change our laws to ensure that Muslim citizens who advocate sharia or preach Jihad or the inequality of "infidels" and of women should have their citizenship revoked and be deported back to their country of origin.

We need to create an environment where the practice of Islam is made difficult. Muslim citizens should be forced to either accept our secular ways or leave if they desire sharia. Much of this can be done in a non-discriminatory way, by simply refusing to allow special pleading to Muslims.

For Europe, the most important thing to do right now is to dismantle the European Union in its present form, and regain national control over our borders and our legislation. The EU is so deeply flawed as an organisation, and so heavily infiltrated by Eurabian and pro-Islamic thinking that it simply cannot be reformed. And let’s end the stupid support for the Palestinians that the Eurabians have encouraged, and start supporting our cultural cousin, Israel.

We should implement a policy of containment of the Islamic world. We should restrain their ability to hurt us physically. We can’t prevent it completely, but we should limit it as much as possible. Muslims try to wear us down through terrorism. They should be worn down through mockery and criticism.

Islam is an all-or-nothing religion which cannot be secularised. Islam may not be able to achieve the world dominance it desires, but it may be able to start a world war. We can only try to prevent this from happening.

We should fight for the right to preserve our own culture and pass it on to future generations. Upholding national borders has become more important in the age of globalisation, terrorism and mass migration, not less. Nobody has so far made any convincing model of a supranational democracy.

We now have a political class who spend much of their time travelling around the world. They no longer feel as attached to the people they are supposed to represent as they did in the past. This is perhaps inevitable, but it feeds a growing sense of detachment between ordinary people and their supposed leaders.

The West is declining as a percentage of world population. We have no obligation to "save" the Islamic world, and do not have the financial strength nor the demographic numbers to do so even if we wanted to. We are not in a position to help all of the Third World out of poverty, certainly not by allowing all of them to move here.

The West is becoming so overwhelmed by immigration that this may trigger civil wars in several Western nations in the near future. We already have massive Third World ghettos in our major cities. We should make our countries Islam-unfriendly and implement a policy of containment of Dar al-Islam. This is the most civilised thing we can do in order to save ourselves, but also to limit the loss of life among both Muslims and non-Muslims.

Authorities or groups of dedicated individuals should engage in efforts to explain the real nature of Islam, emphasising the division that Islam teaches between Believer and Infidel, the permanent state of war between Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb, and the use of religious deception. We should explain why Islam encourages despotism, economic paralysis, and intellectual failure in Islamic countries. Let Muslims understand that their political, economic, social, intellectual, and moral failures are a result of Islamic teachings.

We should implement a policy of containment of the Islamic world, but for this to work we will sometimes have to take military action to crush Arab pretensions to grandeur. The Islamic movement “has turned the civility of the United States and Europe into a weapon and turned it against us. Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaeda, the whole Islamic Jihad, are agents of nation states who want to weaken the West by a proxy war.

We are in the middle of the largest population boom and the largest migration waves in human history. Far more people want to live in the West than we can possibly let in.

Europeans should adopt legislation securing the right to free speech. European authorities are becoming increasingly totalitarian in their censorship efforts to conceal the fact that they are no longer willing or able to uphold even the most basic security of their citizenry. Europe needs free speech more than ever.

Europe’s elites have lost contact with the people, and the people have lost contact with reality. Utopian multiculturalism, welfarism, radical feminism and transnationalism will all soon come crashing down.

People tend to get the governments they deserve. Maybe we get weak leaders because we are weak. Muslims blame everybody else for their own failures because they can never admit the deep flaws in their culture. We shouldn’t make the same mistake.

2.6 The European Court of Human Rights is a cultural Marxist controlled political entity

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg is an international judicial body established in 1950 to monitor respect of human rights by states. It has become an institution designed to protect and serve the foundations of European political correctness/cultural Marxism/multiculturalism.

2.7 Waiting for Churchill or Godot?
By Fjordman

Winston Churchill understood Islam. In 1899, he wrote:
"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities - but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytising faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."

2.8 The failure of Western feminism
By Fjordman

As in war, the winners seize the indigenous women all the while protecting their own. The whole rhetoric that aims to debase the European woman or France is a part of the feminisation of Europeans, of the idea that Europe is a land to be conquered, a habitat open to all forms of pillage.

As a Western man, I would be tempted to say that Western women have to some extent brought this upon themselves. They have been waging an ideological, psychological and economic war against European men for several generations now …

In the big scheme of things, the truth is that European men have treated women with greater respect than the men of almost any other major civilisation on earth.

The truth is that any nation is always protected from external aggression by the men.

Lee Harris:
"Muslims are doing everything in their power to encourage their alpha boys to be tough, aggressive, and ruthless. We teach our boys to be good students, to aim at getting good jobs with large, safe corporations, to plan prudently for their retirement. They want their boys to become holy warriors. We are proud if our sons get into a good college; they are proud if their sons die as martyrs. ... The end of testosterone in the West alone will not culminate in the end of history, but it may well culminate in the end of the West."

2.9 How the feminists paved the way for Islam
By Fjordman

Radical feminism has been one of the most important causes of the current weakness of Western civilisation, both culturally and demographically. Feminists, often with a Marxist world view, have been a crucial component in establishing the suffocating public censorship of Political Correctness in Western nations. They have also severely weakened the Western family structure, and contributed to making the West too soft and self-loathing to deal with aggression from Muslims.

Feminism could prove lethal to Islam. Islam survives on the extreme subjugation of women. Deprived of this, it will suffocate and die. Some men lament the loss of a sense of masculinity in the modern world. Perhaps a meaningful role could be to make sure that our sisters and daughters grow up in a world where they have the right to education and a free life, and to protect them against Islamic barbarism.

2.10 Feminism leads to the oppression of women
By Fjordman

As Harvard University president, Lawrence Summers in 2005 gave a speech where he dared to suggest that innate differences between men and women could explain why men hold more seats as top scientists than women.

One of the hallmarks of Western civilisation has been our thirst for asking questions about everything. Political correctness is thus anti-Western both in its form and in its intent. Feminists formed the vanguard of PC, the ideology that has blinded our universities to the Islamic threat.

When the long-term effects of feminism finally set in, Western women may very well end up being genuinely oppressed under the boot of Islam. Radical feminism thus leads to oppression of women.

2.11 What is the cause of low birth rates?
By Fjordman

The gap between the Western world and the Islamic world in birth rates is clearly caused by religious factors, but the differences between industrialised nations are far more difficult to explain.

Within Europe, where social security benefits are dangerously generous, there are differences among countries. Some of the most generous schemes are found in Germany, France, and the Mediterranean countries — as are the lowest fertility rates in the region.

The best solution is also the simplest: get the state out of the way.

2.12 The fatherless civilisation
By Fjordman

The decade from the first half of the 1960s to the first half of the 1970s was clearly a major watershed in Western history, with the start of non-Western mass immigration in the USA, the birth of Eurabia in Western Europe, and the rise of multiculturalism and radical feminism. The people who viciously attacked their own civilisation enjoyed uninterrupted economic growth for decades, yet embraced Marxist-inspired ideologies and decided to undermine the very society which had allowed them to live privileged lives.

This was also the age of decolonisation in Western Europe and desegregation in the USA, which created an atmosphere where Western civilisation was seen as evil. Whatever the cause, we have since been stuck in a pattern of eternal opposition to our own civilisation.

The current situation isn't sustainable. The absence of fatherhood has created a society full of social pathologies. If the West is to survive, we need to reassert a healthy dose of male authority. In order to do so we need to roll back the welfare state. Perhaps we need to roll back some of the excesses of Western feminism too.

2.13 The Western European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist intellectual elite — who are they?

Cultural Marxists, suicidal humanists or capitalist globalists are all multiculturalists. Multiculturalism is the European hate ideology which was created to destroy Western civilisation. Multiculturalism has allowed Islamic demographic warfare to be initiated.

The free society as we have known it carries in itself the forces of its own destruction. Once freedom has been achieved it is taken for granted and ceases to be valued, and the free growth of ideas, which is the essence of a free society, will bring about the destruction of the foundations on which it depends.

2.14 Labour wanted mass immigration to engineer multicultural UK

Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett. He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote". As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.

2.15 Labour cynically plotted to transform the entire make-up of Britain
By Melanie Phillips

For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened. Now we learn that the Labour government has been engaged upon a deliberate and secret policy of national cultural sabotage.

So that's how New Labour views the white working class, supposedly the very people it is in politics to champion. Who can wonder that its core vote is now decamping in such large numbers to the BNP when Labour treats them like this?

2.16 Why the discipline of sociology must be completely removed from academia

Sociology is described as a revolutionary tool for change by Marxist intellectuals. Students of sociology are taught how the public apparatus may be used (by deliberately manipulating statistics, and rejecting all aspects of biology) to portray and propagate a Marxist world view. Faculties of sociology are Marxist indoctrination camps where the students learn how to infiltrate public institutions and covertly contribute to change the character of society by presenting falsified reports and statistics.

2.17 The psychology of cultural Marxists

One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is multiculturalism, so a discussion of the psychology of multiculturalists can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of Western Europe in general.

The two psychological tendencies that underlie cultural Marxists we call feelings of inferiority and over-socialisation. Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of cultural Marxism as a whole, while over-socialisation is characteristic only of a certain segment of cultural Marxism.

When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has feelings of inferiority. Those who are most sensitive about "politically incorrect" terminology are activists, many of whom do not even belong to any "oppressed" group but come from privileged strata of society.

Cultural Marxists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the cultural Marxist of the over-socialised type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for cultural Marxist activism. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for Muslims, it would make sense to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to non-Muslims who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But cultural Marxist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their own hostility and frustrated need for power.

2.18 Democracy and the media bias
By Fjordman

In democratic societies the press, the Fourth Estate, should supposedly make sure that the government does its job properly as well as raise issues of public interest. In practice, we now seem to have a situation where the political elites cooperate with the media on making sure that some topics receive insufficient or unbalanced attention while others are simply kept off the agenda altogether.

In Europe, politics is more and more becoming an empty ritual. The real decisions are taken before the public even get a chance to vote on them, and the media won't talk honestly about important matters. Our daily lives are run by a bloated bureaucracy which is becoming increasingly transnational.

I've suggested before that native Europeans face three enemies simultaneously when fighting against the Islamisation of their lands: Enemy 1 is the anti-Western bias of our media and academia, which is a common theme throughout the Western world. Enemy 2 are Eurabians and EU-federalists, who deliberately break down established nation states in favor of a pan-European superstate. Enemy 3 are Muslims.

2.19 The EUSSR/USASSR media hegemony

Living in Western Europe we are told that the news media are free. It is certainly true that there are few government conspiracies to censor. Unlike in totalitarian countries, the media are not generally state run or controlled. But this is not the full story.

There are six reasons why the Western European media do not give a balanced view of world events:
1. Almost all journalists support multiculturalism
2. Most media outlets are owned by multinational companies
3. Advertising and ratings
4. News sources
5. Negative responses
6. Demonisation and use of language

The Western European multiculturalist regimes subsidise multiculturalist newspapers. The so-called "free press" in Western Europe is a myth and has never existed.

2.20 Pro Muslim media strategies

Western Europeans are spoon fed with inaccuracies every single day. There is a disproportional balance that indirectly or directly protects Islam. Jihadi attacks are systematically covered up, ignored or toned down by Western journalists. Telling the truth would undermine multiculturalism.

An eight-page Whitehall guide lists words they should not use when talking about terrorism in public and gives politically correct alternatives. They are told not to refer to Muslim extremism as it links Islam to violence. Instead, they are urged to talk about terrorism or violent extremism. Fundamentalist and Jihadi are also banned because they make an "explicit link" between Muslims and terror. Ministers should say criminals, murderers or thugs instead.

2.21 Questions and polls your government and news agencies have disallowed

Why haven't the following polls and questions been raised and presented to Europeans?
1. Do you support mass Muslim immigration?
2. Do you support the Islamisation of Europe?
3. Do you trust your government regarding mass Muslim immigration?
4. Do you support the implementation of the EU's Eurabia project?
5. Do you want Europe to merge with the Islamic world?
6. Do you see Islamisation as a threat to Europe?
7. Do you support the building of mosques in Europe?
8. Would you support expelling Muslims?
9. Would you support revoking citizenship of Muslims?
10. Would you support your government to stop Islamic demographic warfare?
11. Would you support the deportation of Muslims from Europe?
12. Would you support the creation of armed resistance groups?
13. Would you support strikes by these groups against your government?

Everyone knows how the majority would respond:
NO, to question 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7
YES to 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
This is why no one has presented these questions or polls.

2.22 Dealing with journalists: authorising your own character assassination by the multiculturalist PC press

When confronted, approach all journalists with extreme prejudice. Western European journalists are not representative of the opinion of the people but instead represent a cultural Marxist, humanist and globalist world view.

Western Europe today lacks the balance of cultural conservative news agencies. A majority of countries do not have any objective agencies but are rather completely monopolised by multiculturalist agencies, or rather political entities. Unless you are a master at this game you should never give direct interviews and you should never agree to give interviews unconditionally.

2.23 Understanding the fundamentals behind multiculturalism

From Titans to lemmings: the suicide of Europe
By Reconquista

The brilliant German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche stated that Christianity would be abandoned en masse in the twentieth century but that Westerners would still cling to this inversion of morality. Marxists and liberals exploit this inversion of morality by creating large numbers of "victim groups" who form minorities in Western society but whose "victim status" is used to dictate morality to the majority. Multiculturalists prosecute their self-righteous moral crusade by proudly championing the cause of anybody who they deem to be weak and oppressed.

The core principle of liberals and multiculturalists is that everybody is equal. In the fluffy bunny la-la land of these vain zealots, the sexes are equal; all ethnic groups are equal; all sexuality is equal; all children are equal and children are equal to adults; animals are equal to humans; all cultures are equal and all religions are equal.

Pursuing equality is to clash with Mother nature. Nature abhors equality. Look at males and females. Some males are strong, others are weak. Equality is just as scarce among women. Feminists claim that women have been victims of men, that men have oppressed women for centuries and that the sexes are equal. But equalising the sexes has led to a crippling feminisation of Western society.

If I say: "Judaism and Christianity are two religions whose morality and values took mankind further than any other religion and they are largely peaceful and tolerant religions", it would be difficult to disagree with me. But if I say: "Islam is an evil, retarded and supremacist death-cult that refuses to afford women and unbelievers respect and the most basic of human rights because Islam advocates violence to force submission to Allah", I will be smeared as an Islamophobe and a racist.

One way street

Why is it that only the West plays the multicultural game? If all races are equal, why aren't the Chinese, the Japanese, the Koreans, the Arabs, the Pakistanis, the Indians, the Africans all accepting masses of immigrants into their lands and allowing alien cultures and religions to be of equal importance to their own?

If all ethnical groups and all cultures are equal, why is it black Africans, Afro-Caribbean blacks, Pakistanis, Indians, Chinese, and Eastern Europeans want to abandon their own lands en masse to live in the lands of the West?

If all races and all cultures and all religions were truly equal, the rest of the world would be falling over themselves to welcome masses of immigrants from all over the world into their lands to enrich their people with the delights of diversity in the name of equality and multiculturalism.

It is very easy to be pious about equality and multiculturalism when you live in an advanced, wealthy society. It is far less easy to eulogise about multiculturalism and equality when you live in a violent, unjust and less advanced poverty-stricken society. Maybe this explains why we don't see many ranting multicultural disciples demanding the imposition of equality in countries such as Iran. They know as well as you do what would happen if they tried to. Such is the folly of claiming equality between peoples and cultures.

A very unequal equality

The doctrine of multiculturalism is only ever applied against Western - make that white - people.

Identity politics is a good example of this. Blacks, Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus, Chinese, Pakistanis, Indians - all of these people and more are allowed to form their own special groups with the aim of protecting and furthering their own interests based entirely on race or creed. Yet if indigenous Westerners form their own special interest group, they will be outrageously and hypocritically vilified as "racists" and "fascists".

Multiculturalism and the fantasy world of equality only apply to the West and are applied using exactly the moral inversion predicted by Nietzsche. It is a madness that is leading the entire white race into the abyss.

A grand deception

The folly of multiculturalism and its mantra of equality is one of the biggest con-tricks ever played on a people. British people who suffer the consequences of multiculturalism allow those who do not to appear virtuous and righteous with their "we're all equal" mantra and to lie and deceive at every turn to protect their own selfish interests.


Just as Nietzsche foresaw, the godless religion of Marxism, with its evil twins liberalism and multiculturalism, works by creating "victim groups" who are then used to destroy Western society by inverting morality and demanding more and more from society to compensate for their unjust oppression.

Equality is used to support the cause of these victims. From equality of the sexes to equality of the races, Marxists need victims for their rotten ideology to flourish. The attitude of the Third World to the West is that what's yours is ours and what is ours is our own. It is a despicable attitude that is reducing the West to a life-support machine for other less advanced races.

Mother nature will demand they pay the heaviest price for their arrogance. She will not care one iota if the entire white race has to pay too.

2.24 Ignorance and multiculturalism must be destroyed
By D.L. Adams

There are two critical impediments that prevent the West from engaging effectively, or at all, in the existential conflict with Islam. Ignorance and multiculturalism must be deconstructed and delegitimised.

It is a moral and ethical failure to be ignorant of the purposes and doctrine of political Islam. Ignorance of an existential enemy is shameful and indefensible. Multiculturalism must be exposed for the disastrous pseudo-philosophy of ignorance that it is. Founded upon ignorance and silly utopian anti-intellectualism, multiculturalism prevents us from responding to political Islam because to do so in our morally bankrupt multicultural world is seen as intolerance. Defending your nation from cultural and literal annihilation is not intolerance. It is the height of patriotism and rationality.

The fundamental dual concepts of multiculturalism are tolerance and inclusiveness. These concepts are founded upon the idea that all cultures are of equal value and that differences between cultures are to be applauded and accepted rather than condemned, even when such condemnation is appropriate.

There has long been a concept in the United States regarding immigration and assimilation that if we show newcomers to our shores how nice, welcoming, and good we are, they will all become Americans. This model has worked for generations with European, Asian, South Americans and immigrants from across the world. Islam does not fit this model.

Islam does not assimilate. Islam is about submission. Adherents of the "religion of peace" are interested only in bringing the entire world under Allah's religion. For adherents of this miserable and cruel political ideology of hate and conquest, only one religion, one political system, and one culture is allowed — that of Allah and Mohammed. All others are to be annihilated.

Multiculturalism is the tool by which Islam infiltrates our institutions and political systems. Islam is at war with all non-believers everywhere and forever. This is called jihad or fighting in Allah's cause. Multiculturalism and ignorance are the greatest weaknesses of the cultures of the West.

Assimilation has failed because resurgent Islam has no interest in assimilation. Multiculturalists refuse to believe this. We in the West must accept the literal truth that some cultures are unpleasant and have belief systems that are contrary to ours. The idea that everyone loves freedom is a broken and confused concept. In Islam. the only freedom that is considered of value is the complete submission to Allah and the doctrine of Islam. Islam sees freedom in total submission to the doctrine of Islam.

When we open our doors to Islam, we open ourselves and our nations to forces that reject our concepts of tolerance and inclusiveness. This is the absurdity and horror of multiculturalism.

We must learn the doctrine of Islam. This is about nothing less than our existential survival as non-Islamic countries and cultures. We must dispel our ignorance of Islam. All cultures are not equivalent. Some cultures are better than others, and some are our enemies and some our friends. This is reasonable, rational thinking.

Multiculturalism is the tool by which Islam gains access to our countries for the purpose of the destruction of the host culture. The doctrine of Islam is clear on these points. Jihad is a responsibility for all Muslims. It is the command of both Allah and Mohammed. When we know nothing of Islam, we lose. Ignorance of Islam is not acceptable. It is a moral and ethical failure. Multiculturalism is a tool of Islam. Multiculturalism must be destroyed.

2.25 Is capitalism always a force for freedom?

More companies are now giving in to Muslim pressure over Geert Wilders' Islam-critical movie. One does not have to be a socialist to see that the short-term interests of big business are not always identical to the long-term interests of the nation as a whole, especially not when it comes to immigration. Multinational corporations, which by definition have loyalty toward no nation, should not be allowed to direct national immigration policies.

Companies that support mass immigration because they want easy access to cheap labour, including Muslim immigration, contribute to Islamisation, at home and abroad.

2.26 Big business, a driving force behind immigration
By John Laughland

In Britain, the House of Lords has reported that the economic impact of immigration is minimal and has concluded that it ought to be capped. The report is seen as a decisive defeat for the government's long-held view that immigration boosts the economy by increasing production.

Big business is in favour of immigration not only because it drives down wages but also because it is culturally in favour of multiculturalism. Multinational companies are vehicles of cosmopolitanism, every bit as powerful and influential as the more intellectual proponents of multiculturalism and the end of the nation-state.

The big corporation likes immigration because immigrants drive down wages and are typically not unionised. Big companies do not care if immigrants do not pay taxes, or if they make extra demands on schools and hospitals, because the state picks up the bill for that. Big companies operate on the principle "privatize the profits, socialise the losses", demanding that policies be pursued which increase their income because the costs are passed onto the taxpayer and society at large.

2.27 Migration has brought 'zero' economic benefit
By Philip Johnston and Robert Winnett

Ten years of record immigration to Britain has produced virtually no economic benefits for the country, a parliamentary inquiry has found. "Our overall conclusion is that the economic benefits of net immigration to the resident population are small and close to zero in the long run."

The population is increasing by more than 190 000 every year, largely as a result of immigration. Foreign workers now make up 12.5% of the labour force, compared with 7.4% a decade ago. Critics say Labour lost control of the borders, issued too many work permits and should not have opened up the labour market to eastern Europe.

David Coleman, a professor of demography at Oxford University, said in his evidence to the committee that the Government had excluded costs from crime, security, the race relations process, health "tourism" and imported ailments such as tuberculosis.

2.28 What does Muslim immigration cost Europe?
By Fjordman

Sweden's finance minister Pär Nuder says more immigrants should be allowed into Sweden in order to safeguard the welfare system. But estimates indicate that immigration costs Sweden at least 40 to 50 billion Swedish kroner every year, probably several hundred billions, and has greatly contributed to bringing the Swedish welfare state to the brink of bankruptcy.

The number of rape charges in Sweden has quadrupled in just above twenty years. Rape cases involving children under the age of 15 are six times as common today as they were a generation ago. Resident aliens from Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia dominate the group of rape suspects.

In June 2006, a report from NHO, the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise, stated that the current immigration policies were a serious threat to the country's economy. Norway is the planet's third largest exporter of oil, next to Saudi Arabia and Russia. Yet according to NHO, there is a risk that much of the profit Norway earns from oil could be spent on paying welfare for a rapidly growing immigrant population.

A Danish think tank has estimated that the net cost of immigration was up to 50 billion kroner every year. Denmark could save huge sums by stopping immigration from less developed countries. A study found that every other immigrant from the Third World — especially from Muslim countries — lacked the qualifications for even the most menial jobs on the organised Danish labour market.

Professor Kjetil Storesletten at the University of Oslo said that the net contribution of immigrants to the economy was probably negative in Norway, too: "Admitting immigrants with low levels of education leads nowhere. We cannot continue the immigration policies we have followed until now."

There are now several researchers who predict that in Norway, Sweden and Denmark, the native population and their descendants will become a minority in their own country within this century.

In the spring of 2006, police were deployed at a Berlin school after teachers complained that they could not cope with their students' aggression and disrespect. A teacher who recently left the school told the Tagesspiegel newspaper that ethnic Arab pupils were bullying ethnic Turks, Germans and other nationalities. "School for them," said Petra Eggebrecht, former director of the Rütli school, "is simply a place to fight for peer recognition, where young criminals become idols."

In 2005, it was reported that 82% of crimes in Copenhagen were committed by immigrants or descendants of immigrants, and the police pressed charges against second-generation immigrants five times as frequently per capita as against ethnic Danes. Doormen working in the Danish capital are now often armed with guns or clubs so as to be able to defend themselves against violent immigrant gangs.

A Norwegian researcher warned that ethnic gangs could give Norway the kind of immigrant-related organised crime that had previously been unknown in Scandinavia. Arne Johannessen from the Norwegian Police Organisation warned in 2003 that the cost of crime may have been doubled during the previous decade, in part due to immigration.

In Sweden, there has been a steep rise in all kinds of crime and violence at the same time as an unprecedented amount of immigration to the country. The Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet revealed that 9 out of the 10 most criminal ethnic groups in Sweden were Muslims.

In the Netherlands, there has been no overall economic benefit to population change since unskilled guest workers were invited to the Netherlands in the early 1970s. According to Paul Scheffer, a leading critic of multiculturalism and professor of urban sociology at Amsterdam University, up to 60% of first-generation Turkish and Moroccan populations are unemployed.

Former French PM Charles de Gaulle, disappointed by the loss of the French colonies in Africa and the Middle East, as well as with France's waning influence in the international arena, in the 1960s, decided to create a strategic alliance with the Arab and Muslim world to compete with the dominance of the United States and the Soviet Union. This alliance became the position of the European Community during the 1970s.

2.29 Current and recent Jihads in Asia and Africa

Islam has systematically murdered more than 300 million individuals and enslaved more than 300 million the last 1400 years. The Jihads and genocides are continuing all over the world.

2.30 Overview of Jihadi terror attacks

None of the European media organisations makes any attempt to track or create overviews of Jihadi terror attacks.

2.31 Muslim persecution of Christians
By Robert Spencer

Christian persecution by Muslims has become a familiar narrative, repeated with terrifying frequency in Muslim controlled areas throughout the world, but especially in the Middle East.

The religious cleansing of Christians in the Muslim world does not surprise anyone familiar with the origins of Islam. The prophet Muhammad declared: "I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslims."

Converts from Islam to Christianity are often hunted in the Muslim world, where virtually all religious authorities agree that such individuals deserve death. Muhammad himself commanded such a punishment: "Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.”

There is an evasiveness in some Muslims' claim that Islam recognises Christianity as a legitimate faith. For the Christianity that the Qur’an recognises is not Christianity as millions practice it around the world today. Muslims found that the New Testament affirmed the Christian understanding of Jesus that the Qur’an repudiated, and contained no trace of an idea that a later prophet would come with a final revelation. Thus Muslims began to teach that Christians had corrupted the pure Gospel that was given to Jesus by Allah. This is a key source of much of the enduring enmity between Muslims and Christians.

2.32 Christians in the Middle East

The ethno-religious cleansing of Christian peoples in the Middle East alternate between military suppression and political oppression. In Egypt, the large Coptic nation is systematically discriminated against on the constitutional, political, administrative, and cultural levels. Para-military fundamentalist groups are conducting pogroms against the Christians.

In Sudan, abundant reports by international human rights organisations have documented the enslavement by the northern fundamentalist forces of southern African Christians. According to the reports and experts, there are today up to a million black slaves from Sudan who have either been taken to the north of that country to work or sold in other Arab countries.

2.33 Fighting for their survival — A Christian exodus from the Arab world
By Amira El Ahl, Daniel Steinvorth, Volkhard Windfuhr and Bernhard Zand

Violence, terrorism and the Islamists' growing influence pose a threat to Christianity in the Middle East. In some countries, members of an unpopular Christian minority are already fighting for their survival — or fleeing for their lives.

There are no reliable figures on the size of Christian minorities in the Middle East. This is partly attributable to an absence of statistics, and partly to the politically charged nature of producing such statistics in the first place.

Christians are often better educated and more affluent than their Muslim neighbours. Many Middle Eastern Christians now have relatives in Europe, North America and Australia who help them emigrate. Their high level of education increases their chances of obtaining visas. Those who leave are primarily doctors, lawyers and engineers.

2.34 Converts in the Muslim world

Converts from Islam to Christianity are often hunted in the Muslim world, where virtually all religious authorities agree that such individuals deserve death. Muhammad himself commanded such a punishment: "Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him." This is still the position of all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence, although there is some disagreement over whether the law applies only to men, or to women also.

2.35 Text book Jihad in Egypt
By Andrew G. Bostom

Teaching Egyptian school children anti-infidel jihad hatred is a long, ongoing, and ignoble tradition even within the modern era. As the scholar E. W. Lane reported after several years of residence in both Cairo and Luxor (initially in 1825-1828, then in 1833-1835):
"I am credibly informed that children in Egypt are often taught at school a regular set of curses to denounce upon the persons and property of Christians, Jews, and all other unbelievers in the religion of Mohammad."

Sadly, the sacralised hatred of jihad is still being inculcated as part of the formal education of Muslim youth throughout the Muslim world.

2.36 The Afghan-Bosnian mujahideen network in Europe
By Evan F. Kohlmann

European leaders have finally become aware of a lurking extremist threat that has been brewing in dark corners across the continent for almost two decades. Western European democracies — many of whom thought that they were insulated from the threat of organised international terrorism — are discovering growing numbers of disaffected Muslim youth, hardened by scenes of televised bloodshed in the Middle East and the unwelcoming demeanor of some "native" Europeans. Frustrated by a perceived lack of social or political mobility, these men eventually become ideal recruits for the growing network of "pan-European mujahideen."

The United Kingdom has been and remains one of the most active bases of radical Islam across Western Europe. Certainly, it can be said that the Iranian revolution and the war in Afghanistan together started the ball rolling for the Sunni British fundamentalist movement. However, their ideas did not begin to have a wide appeal among local Muslim youths until the era of Bosnia-Herzegovina. When scenes of devastation and war crimes began to air on BBC television broadcasts, many British Muslims were shocked that such horrific events could take place in modern Europe.

Scandinavia has become an important tactical base for Islamic militant groups from the Middle East. Countries like Norway, Sweden, and Denmark are perceived as tolerant and willing to grant political asylum even to militant leaders on the run from law enforcement and intelligence agencies.

2.37 Justification of Muslim crime against non-Muslims

According to the Salafists, non-Muslims are lesser people. By saying this they justify the behaviour of young Muslim criminals who target the non-Muslims whilst they never touch fellow Muslims. They told me that drug trafficking is perfectly acceptable as long as one only sells to non-Muslims. They told me that stealing from non-Muslims is allowed as long as one does not harm fellow Muslims.

2.38 The real roots of Muslim hatred
By Andrew G. Bostom

Fundamentalism and its accompanying "Muslim rage" may derive from a steady decline in the geopolitical power of Muslim states, evidenced, most dramatically, by the official dissolution of the Ottoman Caliphate after World War I, and the creation of the state of Israel after World War II.

An obvious alternative explanation for the etiology and persistence of Muslim animus toward non-Muslims is what Muslim children, for generations, have been taught to think about the infidel "other," regardless of the geopolitical circumstances.

Ibn Warraq:
"Only Koranic criticism can help Muslims to look at their Holy Scripture in a more rational and objective way, and prevent young Muslims from being fanaticised by the Koran’s less tolerant verses ... My priority would be the wholesale rewriting of school texts, which at present preach intolerance of non-Muslims, particularly Jews. One hopes that education will encourage critical thinking and rationality."

2.39 The ongoing civil war in Europe — Muslims want autonomous territory, not better integration
From the desk of The Brussels Journal, 10.2006

Radical Muslims in several of France's local communities are waging an undeclared "intifada" against the police.

2.40 Muslim atrocities committed against Western Europeans 1960-2010

The following report includes Muslim atrocities committed against indigenous Europeans from 1960-2010. It also includes projections to 2020 based on historical numbers. The report includes atrocities such as murder, indirect murder, rape, gang rape, robberies, beatings, arson and more. ...

The reason we now live in a bunkered society is that Muslims are among us. These Muslim perpetrators view Europe as "dar-al-Harb" (house of war), as taught in the Quran. As such, the exploitation and pillaging of European resources and people is the divine right of all Muslims. A kafr/infidel is an individual regarded as human garbage to a devout Muslim. The Muslims therefore takes advantage of their Allah-given prerogative to rape, kill and steal from Europeans as they view this as the spoils of war.

These Muslims must be considered as wild animals. Do not blame the wild animals but rather the multiculturalist category A and B traitors who allowed these animals to enter our lands, and continue to facilitate them. This is nothing less than a genocide aided and abetted by our own elites, primarily Marxist, suicidal humanist and capitalist globalist politicians and journalists. They will eventually pay the ultimate price for their war crimes.

2.41 Various forms of Jihad

Islamists cannot wage all-out war on Europe and expect to win. But they have a religious duty to try to wage Jihad in some way and eventually conquer all countries. There are more devious ways to conquer than straightforward war.

2.42 The Islamisation process in European countries

The Islamic takeover of a country or a region of the country is dependent on the relative proportion of Muslims compared with non-Muslims, and/or the influence of militant Muslims among the Muslim population. A higher proportion of Muslims among the population drives the political development along a certain path. Eight phases can be discerned:

1. Western society in peace
2. Muslim ghettoes
3. Preparations for jihad
4. Start of jihad
5. Development of jihad
6. Jihad and insurgency
7. Jihad to civil war
8. Victory for Islam

2.43 Islamisation process of Western countries from 1% to 100%

The process of the Islamisation of a country starts off from small issues and specific demands or requirements, and develops and increases progressively with the increasing percentage of Muslims in a country. Here's how it works:

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone.

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytise from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.

Above 5%, they will exercise an influence out of proportion to their percentage of the population: they will push for the introduction of halal food and work for a ruling to let them rule themselves under sharia.

Above 10%, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions, and any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats.

Above 20%, expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and church and synagogue burning.

Above 40%, you get widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare.

Above 60%, expect unfettered persecution of non-believers, sporadic ethnic cleansing, and use of sharia as a weapon.

Above 80%, expect state-run ethnic cleansing and genocide.

At 100%, Muslims start killing each other.

There are thousands of Islamic no-go zones all across Europe, where non-Muslims cannot move freely without immediate danger of getting assaulted, robbed, raped, beaten, or harassed by Muslim gangs or individuals.

Islamisation or the creation of Islamic no-go zones starts as soon as the first Muslim family moves into a neighbourhood. A progressive dhimmitude begins for all non-Muslims as they show special considerations towards the Muslims and yield to pressure to give the Muslims an increasing number of concessions.

The moral of the story: you cannot reason with Islam, you can only isolate it.

2.44 List of Muslim demands for Sharia in Europe

If only the UK, Greece, Switzerland and the Nordic countries remove the cross from their flags, Muslims will not feel discriminated against and there will be no more terror attacks. ...

2.45 Saudi Arabia — The serpent's head

Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries have spread Wahabism and other harsh forms of Salafism around the world for the last 35 years. Saudi Arabia alone have spent more than 87 billion USD abroad the past two decades propagating Wahabism. The bulk of this funding goes to the construction and operating expenses of thousands of mosques, madrassas and Muslim cultural centers throughout the world. These Islamic institutions are now found in every single country in the West, accompanied by Imams who are "Saudi approved".

2.46 How many Muslims worldwide support militant Islam or Jihadi Salafism?

This is a complicated question with many facets. There is a big difference between active support, sympathising and empathising with this cause. An armed Jihad (armed struggle) always has specific goals. Jihadists in the West have other objectives. They acknowledge that Islam is still very weak in Europe. The moderate Muslims are playing "good cop" in this context. They will blame poverty, modern colonialism, discrimination, stigmatisation and other root causes as the reasons for the rise of Jihadi Salafism. They will ask for concessions from European politicians and media in order to "prevent" radical Islam.

2.47 Europe's Wahhabi lobby
By Stephen Schwartz — 10/06/2005, Warsaw

The Organisation for Security and Cooperation (OSCE), an international body made up of 55 nations called for a day-long roundtable in Warsaw. The topic was "Intolerance and Discrimination Against Muslims."

The OSCE is political correctness personified. The status of Islam in Europe, which has lately involved bloodshed in several countries, is viewed by OSCEcrats as an intractable challenge. The do-gooders had to relegate the roundtable on Muslims to a place outside the regular agenda of a weeklong "human dimension" assembly in Warsaw. The event served as little more than a platform for ranters and cranks from such countries as Britain and Denmark who were there to defend radical Islam.

2.48 Leaving Islam — interview with an ex-Muslim
By Mohammad Asghar/Jamie Glazov

Mohammad Asghar is an ex-Muslim who came out of Islam after discovering its true teachings. Together with studying the Quran for over twenty-five years, he has also been writing his commentary on its verses — an endeavor, he hopes, that will help non-Muslim leaders, as well as ordinary citizens, understand the true messages they convey to Muslims.

Asghar: "I no more subscribe to the teachings and the doctrines of Islam, as I consider them to be obnoxious and, thus, unfit for good humans."

Aghar: "Apart from the Jews and the Christians, the Muslims also hate the Pagans from the core of their hearts, as they, according to the Quran, are unclean, and, thus, unworthy of living on Allah's earth. Therefore, the Muslims must kill them whenever they get the chance to fulfill the instruction Allah gave them through the Quran."

Asghar: "I am saddened by the fact that the West has not learned anything from the Quran, the history of Islam and from its adherents."

Will Durant (1885-1981): "The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilisation is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within."

Freedom of religion and individual liberties are for those who value them and respect them.

2.49 Moderate Muslims and the Islamisation of Europe

A moderate Muslim is one who wants to closely follow the Quran and the examples and principles of the perfect model of a man for all future and for all the world, Muhammed. And any true Muslim naturally wants to implement sharia laws which are just consequences of the Quran and the sunnah. Such a person cannot in any sense be described as an extreme Muslim. Moderate Muslims in the West cannot pick and choose the parts of the doctrine that they like. That is forbidden by the religion.

A moderate Muslim is not a reform-minded Muslim, who is willing to eliminate some, many or all those principles of Islam that violate human rights. The moderate Muslims want pretty much the same things as the Islamists. The main goal is then partial or full implementation of sharia laws in Europe. The content of the sharia is mainly political; just a small part regards religion as defined in the West. The contents violate human rights and accepted political principles in the West.

2.50 Why we cannot rely on moderate Muslims
By Fjordman

Omar Ahmad, the long-serving chairman of CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, reportedly told a crowd of California Muslims in July 1998, "Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran ... should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth."

Norway’s most controversial refugee, Mullah Krekar, says there's a war going on between the West and Islam, and that Islam will win: "We're the ones who will change you. Just look at the development within Europe, where the number of Muslims is expanding like mosquitoes."

Italian journalist and novelist Oriana Fallaci recalls how, in 1972, she interviewed the Palestinian terrorist George Habash, who told her that the Arab goal was to wage war “against Europe and America” and to ensure that henceforth "there would be no peace for the West."

Muslim Brotherhood leader Muhammad Mahdi Othman Akef said in 2004 to Arab media that America is Satan and will soon collapse:
"I have complete faith that Islam will invade Europe and America, because Islam has logic and a mission."

Professor Moshe Sharon teaches Islamic History at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem: "Peace in Islam can exist only within the Islamic world; peace can only be between Moslem and Moslem. ... With the non-Moslem world or non-Moslem opponents, there can be only one solution — a cease fire until Moslems can gain more power. It is an eternal war until the end of days. Peace can only come if the Islamic side wins. The two civilisations can only have periods of cease-fires."

What counts isn't the difference, if any, between moderate Muslims and radical Muslims, but between Muslims and non-Muslims, and between Muslims and ex-Muslims. Ibn Warraq says that there may be moderate Muslims, but Islam itself is not moderate.

2.51 Is Islam compatible with democracy?

In How the West Was Lost, author Alexander Boot outlines what he thinks ails the modern West. It is a provocative book. Boot:
"In short, if one defines liberty as a condition that best enables the individual to exercise his freedom of choice, then democracy of universal suffrage is remiss on that score."

Immanuel Kant, in his Critique of Pure Reason, methodically demolished all the traditional proofs for the existence of God. Why wasn't he torn limb from limb in the streets of Königsburg by outraged believers? Kant would probably have been killed had he attempted the same thing in the Islamic world, which is one of the reasons why the scientific and industrial revolutions took place in the West, and not under Islam.

Galileo Galilei faced the Inquisition four hundred years ago. The Multicultural Inquisition may not threaten to kill you, but it does threaten to kill your career, and that goes a long way in achieving the same result, whether your crime is claiming that the Earth moves around the Sun or that not all cultures are equal.

F.A. Hayek writes in The Road to Serfdom: "Least of all shall we preserve democracy or foster its growth if all the power and most of the decisions rest with an organisation far too big for the common man to survey or comprehend. Nowhere has democracy ever worked well without a great measure of local self-government, providing a school of political training for the people at large as much as for their future leaders."

British philosopher Roger Scruton: "The personal state is characterised by a constitution, by a rule of law, and by a rotation of office-holders. Its decisions are collectively arrived at by a process that may not be wholly democratic, but which nevertheless includes every citizen and provides the means whereby each citizen can adopt the outcome as his own. Personal states have an inherent preference for negotiation over compulsion and for peace over war."

Scruton notes that the Western personal state is now under pressure from two directions. Supranational institutions are destroying the sense of membership from above, while massive immigration without assimilation is destroying it from below. The European Union "is rapidly destroying the territorial jurisdictions and national loyalties that have, since the Enlightenment, formed the basis of European legitimacy, while putting no new form of membership in their place."

Scruton comments that for the first time in centuries Islam appears to be "a single religious movement united around a single goal," and that "one major factor in producing this unwonted unity is Western civilisation and the process of globalisation that it has set in motion." Globalisation "offers militant Islam the opportunity that it has lacked since the Ottoman retreat from central Europe." It has brought into existence "a true Islamic umma, which identifies itself across borders in terms of a global form of legitimacy, and which attaches itself like a parasite to global institutions and techniques that are the by-products of Western democracy."

Sayyid Qutb: "When the Believer scans whatever man, ancient or modern, has known, and compares it with his own law and system, he realises that all this is like the playthings of children or the searchings of blind men in comparison with the perfect system and the complete law of Islam. And when he looks from his height at erring mankind with compassion and sympathy at its helplessness and error, he finds nothing in his heart except a sense of triumph over error and nonsense."

Qutb: "What are the Arabs without Islam? What is the ideology that they gave, or they can give to humanity if they abandon Islam? The only ideology the Arabs advanced for mankind was the Islamic faith which raised them to the position of human leadership. If they forsake it they will no longer have any function or role to play in human history."

Ibn Warraq: "Islam is a totalitarian ideology that aims to control the religious, social and political life of mankind in all its aspects - the life of its followers without qualification, and the life of those who follow the so-called tolerated religions to a degree that prevents their activities from getting in the way of Islam in any manner. And I mean Islam. I do not accept some spurious distinction between Islam and Islamic fundamentalism or Islamic terrorism. Given the totalitarian nature of Islamic law, Islam does not value the individual, who has to be sacrificed for the sake of the Islamic community. Collectivism has a special sanctity under Islam."

The Christian Science Monitor interviewed a group of followers of Hizb ut-Tahrir, the Party of Liberation, in Jordan. They say that a single Islamic state from Indonesia to Morocco will bring prosperity and let Muslims conquer the West. Hizb ut-Tahrir activist Abu Mohammed: "Islam obliges Muslims to possess power so that they can intimidate — I would not say terrorise — the enemies of Islam. And if after all discussions and negotiations they still refuse, then the last resort will be a jihad to spread the spirit of Islam and the rule of Islam."

The European Council for Fatwa and Research, whose leader is Yusuf al-Qaradawi, are working on a Muslim Constitution for Europe that will be above national legislation.

Bernard Lewis in 2007 told The Jerusalem Post that Islam could soon be the dominant force in Europe. He ironically warned that this Islamisation could be assisted by immigration and democracy.

With Muslim immigration, a culture of threats, legal and social harassment as well as physical intimidation is gradually spreading in non-Muslim countries. What Muslims cannot yet achieve by the sword, they will try to achieve by lawyers backed by Arab oil money. The fear of an expensive court battle is an effective weapon that can be used to silence critics of Islam.

Just as the planet is in the midst of an unprecedented population boom, and technological advances have combined to produce the largest and fastest migration waves in the history of mankind, many democratic nations have become so bogged down by idealistic human rights legislation and naive open border ideologies that they have now lost control over their own borders.

I am critical of the democratic system. I do not believe that it automatically translates into individual liberty. Democratic nations may have to undergo significant changes if the system of democracy is to survive this century.

Muslims are afraid of freedom of speech. They want to intimidate the critics of Islam into silence, while they continue demographic conquest through immigration and high birth rates. They have enjoyed considerable success with this strategy. Our present system of democracy rewards those with high birth rates. A democracy cannot be established in a genuinely Islamic country. It is a waste of time and money to make the attempt.

Islam cannot tolerate freedom of speech, which is its greatest weakness. The United States is well situated to make this challenge. If the United States wants to maintain what it sees as its moral leadership, it can begin by challenging Islamic censorship and intimidation.

2.52 Demography and the Islamisation of Europe

Europe is under siege by Islam. It is under demographic siege. In order for us, the resistance, to do what is required of us we need to properly analyse and comprehend demographic data. European demographic studies, especially in the Balkans and elsewhere, confirm that the Global Islamic Ummah has deliberately waged a demographic warfare against Eastern Europe since the fall of the Christian Byzantine Empire.

In India as in Europe, the Global Islamic Ummah is continuing the ongoing demographic warfare and is seemingly successful. The India elites, just like European elites, are aiding and abetting the Muslim conquest by way of appeasement.

According to a study commissioned by the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper, 56% of Germans said they believed a "clash of cultures" already existed. 71% said they believed Islam to be "intolerant," some 91% said they associated Islam with oppression of women. Asked if there should be a ban on the building of mosques in Germany as long as the building of churches in some Islamic states is forbidden, 56% agreed. There was even considerable backing for ending Germany's constitutional right of freedom of religion with regard to Islam. Asked if strict limits should be imposed on the practice of Islam in Germany to protect the country, 40 per cent said they would support such moves.

In a British poll from February 2010, 70% expressed discontent with multiculturalism and Islamisation. 3 out of 5 Brits believe that the UK has become a broken country due to multiculturalism. Voters are deeply pessimistic about the state of Britain today.

2.54 Europe's decline — Hurrah! We capitulate!
By Fjordman

Gates of Vienna blog, 16 September 2008:
Muslims living in EU countries will in the future be able to divorce according to sharia law. The EU Commission recommends that a couple be able to choose which country's law they will follow if they divorce.

2.55 Jihad destroys the Swedish model
By Fjordman

Sweden was presented during the Cold War as a middle way between capitalism and Communism. When this model of a society collapses — and it will collapse, under the combined forces of Islamic Jihad, the European Union, multiculturalism and ideological overstretch — it is thus not just the Swedish state that will collapse but the symbol of Sweden, the showcase of an entire ideological world view.

It has been said jokingly that while other countries are states with armies, Pakistan is an army with a state. Likewise, it could be argued that Sweden started out being a nation with a bureaucracy and ended up being a bureaucracy with a nation. Swedes pay the highest tax rates of any (supposedly) free nation, and for this they get flawed social security, non-existent physical security and a state apparatus dedicated to their destruction.

Opinion polls have revealed that two out of three Swedes doubt whether Islam can be combined with Swedish society, and a significant proportion of the population have for years wanted more limitations on immigration. Yet not one party represented in parliament is genuinely critical of multicultural society.

2.56 Islamisation and cowardice in Scandinavia
By Fjordman

As German journalist Henryk Broder put it after the 2006 riots over the Danish cartoons of Muhammad: "Objectively speaking, the cartoon controversy was a tempest in a teacup. But subjectively it was a show of strength and, in the context of the 'clash of civilisations,' a dress rehearsal for the real thing. The Muslims demonstrated how quickly and effectively they can mobilise the masses, and the free West showed that it has nothing to counter the offensive."

In 2008, three years after the cartoons were first published, the matter is still very much alive in the minds of many Muslims. More than 200 lawmakers shouted "Death to the enemies of Islam" during an angry demonstration outside the Afghan parliament, protesting the reprinting of the cartoons in Denmark and the release of the Islam-critical film Fitna by the Dutch politician Wilders. Danish aid is helping schools to re-open in Afghanistan, even though critics say the curriculum is based on fundamentalist Islam.

Bruce Bawer, author of the book While Europe Slept: "Sweden took another route. When a political website featured a Jyllands-Posten cartoon, the government sent police to close it down. More recently, hit with his own cartoon crisis involving artist Lars Vilks, Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt not only met Muslim ambassadors, but was praised by one for his 'spirit of appeasement.' "

The cartoon Jihad prompted Indonesia and Norway to hold a Global Inter-Media Dialogue in June 2007 in Oslo. Keynote speaker at the conference, Doudou Dične, the United Nations Special Envoy for racism, xenophobia and intolerance, urged the media to actively participate in the creation of a multicultural society, and expressed concerns that the democratic process could lead to immigration-restrictive parties gaining influence.

Large portions of the mainstream media had been working according to similar ideas long before this conference. In Britain, leading figures of the BBC have proudly announced that they actively promote multiculturalism.

2.57 Our offensive national flag

Discrediting national flags as signs of bigotry is happening all over the Western world. When I was at school, teachers spoke with pride about how a little island in the north Atlantic turned a quarter of the world pink, but now all teachers talk about is the slave trade and how we must hang our heads in shame. I believe we need to feel pride in our gang. But all we ever hear now is that we in England have nothing to be proud about.

2.58 Will the Netherlands survive the 21st century?
By Fjordman

In the Netherlands, there is talk of making Islamic holidays public holidays because Holland is a "Judeo-Christian-Islamic" society, whatever that is. There are plans for a Muslim-only hospital, and former Justice Minister Piet Hein Donner stated that the Dutch should give Muslims more freedoms to behave according to their traditions.

In September 2008 it was made known that British authorities will formally accept rulings of sharia courts on certain matters. Britain has not just culturally but also legally surrendered to its new Muslim masters.

Britain belongs to a growing group of nations where the authorities have more or less surrendered to Islamic rule, openly promote Islamic culture, and harass those who resist. One could add Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium, and probably France to the list, which keeps growing. Norway, Spain, Austria, Germany and others are not far behind.

The Netherlands is becoming an increasingly totalitarian society as a direct result of mass immigration in general and Muslim immigration in particular. The insightful Hans Janssen, Professor of Modern Islamic Ideology at Utrecht University, stated that a peaceful society that wishes to remain existent "will have to find a way to defend itself through non-peaceful means from people who are not peaceful."

In September 2008, politician Geert Wilders said during a speech in Parliament that Moroccans are colonising the Netherlands. According to Wilders, Moroccans didn’t come there to integrate, but "to subjugate the Dutch" and rule over them: "We lose our nation to Moroccan scum who go through life while abusing, spitting and molesting innocent people. They happily accept our dole, houses and doctors, but not our rules and values." According to him there are two nations, one of "climate hysterics and uncontrollable Islamisation," the other, "my nation," Geert Wilders said, "that of the people who have to foot the bill and are being robbed and threatened by Islamic street terrorists." Seven minutes after the speech began, a "technical error" occurred in the television broadcast which was mysteriously solved the very second Wilders finished his speech.

Before the rise of maverick politician Pim Fortuyn, the Dutch political scene had to a great extent been a closed club whose members, regardless of party affiliation, shared similar views. Since all those who were in positions of power were in basic agreement, the will of the people could safely be ignored. Journalists and rival politicians smeared Fortuyn as a dangerous right-wing extremist. Indirectly, this led to his murder by a left-wing activist who stated that he killed him on behalf of Muslims.

Filmmaker Theo van Gogh was murdered by Muslims. MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali has been driven from the country. The Islam-critical MP Geert Wilders is still there, but he is subject to similar smears as Fortuyn was about being a racist, receives daily threats from Muslims and not-so-subtle hints from the establishment that he should tone down his criticism of Muslim immigration. The Dutch political elites are once again firmly in control of public debate.

Wilders’ movie Fitna from March 2008 produced strong reactions from Muslims on a global basis and condemnations from dhimmi appeasers in the Western world. Although the short film didn't do anything other than quote the Koran and statements by Muslim leaders, the United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon condemned it as offensively anti-Islamic: "There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence." The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour condemned the tone and content of Fitna and noted that the Dutch and others should prohibit any advocacy of racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination or hostility. In plain words, they should ban criticism of Islam.

My bet is still on Britain, or possibly Denmark, as the first Western country to face a civil war due to Muslim immigration, but the Netherlands is a potential candidate as well. The Dutch political elites have chosen formal surrender and will enforce sharia and ban everybody disagreeing with this as extremists.

What is happening in Western Europe now is a textbook case of a situation where the social contract is no longer upheld. The natives pay extremely high tax rates to nation states that no longer protect their borders and are both unwilling and incapable of upholding a bare minimum of law and order. The laws are in any case no longer passed with our interest in mind, but by dedicated multiculturalists and globalists specifically hostile to our interests. The European Union is the very definition of tyranny.

2.59 The Spanish and the Portuguese — Once and future dhimmis?
By Fjordman

In May 2008, the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, stated that Islam is part and parcel of Europe and condemned the concept of a clash of civilisations. "Islam today is part of Europe. It is important to understand this. One should not see Islam as outside Europe. We already have an important presence of Islam and Muslims among our citizens," Barroso told a press conference after a dialogue between EU leaders and twenty high-level representatives of Christianity, Judaism and Islam in Europe.

Gustavo de Aristegui, the foreign affairs spokesman for the conservative Popular Party, explains in his book The Jihad in Spain that, in schools throughout the Muslim world, maps are used with Spain and Portugal coloured green because they are still considered part of dar al-Islam, or the House of Islam.

The Socialist PM José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero was swept to power by the Jihadist terrorist train bombings in Madrid in March 2004, the largest peacetime attacks in Spain's modern history. He has been surrendering his country to Muslims and mass immigration every day since then. Zapatero, who has said that "sexual equality is a lot more effective against terrorism than military strength," appointed a pregnant woman as Minister of Defence in April 2008.

Muslims understand the term "dialogue" in a way that differs sharply from that of Westerners. For them, dialogue does not mean an attempt to rationally debate a topic in order to arrive at the truth. Truth is already given: It's called sharia, and the only dialogue that is acceptable is one that will lead to the implementation of sharia, one way or the other.

Since its inception, Islam has been waging an aggressive war against the rest of mankind, with the stated purpose of bringing every single human being on earth under Islamic rule. Infidels have been presented with only three options: Convert to Islam, die, or submit under Islamic rule as a dhimmi. Islam hasn't changed in the last 1400 years. Unless we are prepared to accept conversion or dhimmi status, we have to fight. The Spanish and the Portuguese knew that once.

2.60 Collusion between British government and Muslim terrorists
By Mister Fox

Gordon Brown and Business Secretary Lord Mandelson went to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in the first week of November 2008 to ask them to fund our faltering economies by putting billions into the International Monetary Fund. In return they offered them some control over Britain and the West. The Saudi regime is the motor behind Islamisation of the West.

Eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more than Ł233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995. The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985, with Prince Charles as its honorary patron, is the biggest Muslim educational centre in the United Kingdom. The centre is built as a traditional Oxford college but includes a minaret and a dome.

In November 2006, the British Home Office distributed the pamphlet 'Multicultural Britain — a land of immigrants', encouraging immigrants to come and enjoy the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs, in embassies across the world.

Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, was quoted in July 2008 as saying Christian doctrine is offensive to Muslims, and criticising Christianity's history for its violence, its use of harsh punishments and its betrayal of its peaceful principles. His sent a conciliatory letter to Islamic leaders calling for an alliance between the two faiths.

2.61 Kosovo — just another step in the Islamisation of Europe

The opinion that Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence is illegal is shared by many countries in the world, since it blatantly defies international agreements. For some inexplicable reason, the U.S. and the big West European countries embraced the self-proclaimed independence of this province in the Balkans, which is inhabited by clans of ruthless terrorists.

An independent Kosovo is dangerous for the cultural and social integrity of Europe. The Albanians and other Muslims have been refusing for years to integrate in European society. They have created countless problems in the UK, Italy, France, Germany, the Balkans and many other places.

2.62 The Norwegian Inquisition — sunset in the land of the midnight sun
By Fjordman

Stortinget, the Norwegian parliament, in April 2005 passed a new Discrimination Act. The act says in pretty clear words that in cases of suspected direct or indirect discrimination due to religion or ethnicity, Norwegians are guilty until proven otherwise.

Scandinavia is a utopia lost. Previously quiet Scandinavian nations now suffer Islamic terror threats and death threats against people criticising Islam.

2.63 The anti-racist witch-hunts
By Fjordman

In 2005, the Norwegian parliament passed a new Discrimination Act prepared by then Minister of Integration from the Conservative Party, Erna Solberg, who had earlier called for the establishment of a sharia council in Norway.

A spokesman for the right-wing Progress Party, Per Sandberg, feared that the law would jeopardise the rights of law-abiding citizens. Reverse burden of proof is combined with liability to pay compensation, which means that innocent persons risk having to pay huge sums for things they didn't do.

Similar laws have been passed across much of Western Europe, encouraged by the EU and the Council of Europe (CoE) in cooperation with international Islamic organisations. The Norwegian law followed an initiative from the CoE. There was virtually no public debate about this law.

In Norway, as throughout the Western world, white-on-non-white violence is exceedingly rare. The vast majority of racism and racist violence comes from non-whites against whites, or between different groups of nonwhites. In Oslo, young girls are raped; school-children are threatened with death, robbed and assaulted. The police have warned against "an alarming rise in street violence" in urban areas across the country. This is directly caused by mass immigration.

During the Multicultural craze of the 1990s, the Norwegian left-wing author Torgrim Eggen warned against turbulence caused by mass immigration. The solution to this was not to limit immigration, but to limit criticism of immigration. According to him, xenophobia and opposition to mass immigration should be viewed as a mental illness, and hence "the solution to this xenophobia is that you should distribute medication to those who are seriously affected."

Mohammed Bouyeri, born in Amsterdam of Moroccan parents, killed Theo van Gogh as he was cycling in Amsterdam on Nov. 2, 2004, shooting and stabbing before slashing his throat and pinning a note to his body with a knife. "I did what I did purely out my beliefs," he told judges while clutching a Koran. "I want you to know that I acted out of conviction and not that I took his life because he was Dutch or because I was Moroccan," but because he believed van Gogh insulted Islam in his film criticising the treatment of Muslim women.

Marie Simonsen, the political editor of Norwegian left-wing newspaper Dagbladet, wrote that it should be considered a universal human right for people everywhere to migrate wherever they want to. This would mean virtually certain annihilation for a tiny, wealthy and naive Scandinavian nation.

The concept of human rights is being used to eradicate an entire civilisation, in the name of tolerance and diversity, and the natives are specifically banned from protesting against this.

2.64 Discrimination and harassment against cultural conservatives

Bruce Bawer: "Only one sizable party in the country, the Sweden Democrats, articulates most Swedes' concerns about their country's immigration and integration policies. Again and again, it has been the object of breathtakingly undemocratic treatment by the political establishment."

2.65 ANTIFA/Labour Jugend — State sponsored Marxist lynch mobs
By Fjordman

The German newspaper Die Welt put up an online poll asking their readers whether they thought it was OK to ban an anti-Islamisation demonstration. According to the major blog Politically Incorrect, as of midnight 86% disagreed with this policy. Suddenly, in the middle of the night, thousands of votes miraculously came in and the poll ended with exactly 50% in favor of the ban. Die Welt deleted the comment section because many comments criticised the decision to ban the meeting.

The decision to silence the demonstration against Islamisation was widely supported by the authorities. Thomas Steg, spokesman for German Chancellor Angela Merkel, stated that Berlin favored "intercultural dialogue." The German Interior Ministry stated that "Such a gathering of populists and extremists harms the co-existence that the city and Muslim citizens have striven for." Cologne Mayor Fritz Schramma (CDU) said on public radio that "We don't want their conference and along with a great majority of Cologne people we'll be obstructing them."

ANTIFA are often the useful and extended arm of the current cultural Marxist/multiculturalist establishment. Most European countries have groups like them, bashing, harassing and terrorising all people who oppose or criticize mass Muslim immigration.

2.66 The only English charity organisation is branded as racist while 215 Somali organizations are welcomed

Manifestations of multiculturalism results in extremely disproportionate representation of group oriented interest organisations. The only charitable organisation working for the interest of English people is mocked and persecuted, being labeled as a racist organisation, while thousands of other organisations (215 working for the interest of Somalis, 92 for Pakistanis, even 144 for black interest) are never criticised.

2.67 How the diversity industry/ethnic industries/sub-cultures such as Hip-Hop in combination with unrestricted media rights contributes to destroy society
By John H. McWhorter

The rise of nihilistic rap has mirrored the breakdown of community norms among inner-city youth over the last couple of decades. It was just as gangsta rap hit its stride that neighbourhood elders began really to notice that they’d lost control of young black men, who were frequently drifting into lives of gang violence and drug dealing.

2.68 How the West lost the Cold War
By Fjordman

The Swedish group Antifascistisk Aktion (AFA) are socialists, and as socialists they are convinced that progress can only be made through struggle, and it is implicit that they mean violent struggle: "If we want to fight against capitalism, the working class needs to be united, and in order to be so intolerance cannot be tolerated. However, if we want to fight against intolerance we have to defeat capitalism as an extension of that struggle. Hence anti-fascism, feminism and the struggle against homophobia go hand in hand with the class struggle!"

Broderskapsrörelsen (The Brotherhood), an organisation of Christian members of the Swedish Social Democratic Party, has decided to establish a network for people of other faiths, which largely seems to mean Muslims.

The Social Democrat Ola Johansson, a member of the Brotherhood, has referred to the book Social Justice in Islam by Sayyid Qutb, the notorious Muslim Brotherhood member who has become the spiritual guide for Islamic Jihad terrorists worldwide, as a proof that Muslims support the welfare state and can thus make common cause with the socialists.

The Nazis called themselves national socialists, and they took the socialist component of their ideology quite seriously. They never nationalised all assets of production as the Communists did. They left nominal ownership in private hands, but production was in reality controlled by the state. The Nazis were thus to the left, economically, compared to many of the labour parties in Western Europe today.

The Muslim Brotherhood were also fans of the European Fascist and Nazi movements in the 1930s, as they are of welfare state socialism now. Historian Walter Laqueur notes similarities between Islam and Nazism. Ibn Warraq has used an outline of the Fascist ideology made by Italian novelist Umberto Eco and found that most of its defining hallmarks are shared by Islam.

German sociologist Theodor Adorno was a member of the Frankfurt School and was influenced by Georg Lukács, one of Gramsci's fellow cultural Marxists. The Authoritarian Personality, a book carrying Adorno’s name but in reality produced by the combined efforts of a number of people from the Frankfurt School, was extremely influential in the United States in the generation following WW2 and contributed to the Allied denazification program in Germany.

These writers were inspired by a Marxist worldview and consistently refused to see the heavy socialist influences on the Nazi ideology. Adorno and others argued that late capitalism had developed tools to resist the rise of a socialist society, above all the use of popular culture and education. They apparently concluded that what led to the rise of the Nazis were traditional and conservative viewpoints.

But the Nazis weren’t conservatives. They should more properly be understood as a revolutionary socialist movement. The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt, published in 1951, was somewhat closer to understanding the commonalities between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.

Muhammad Amin al-Husayni, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Arab nationalist leader, a leading force behind the establishment of the Arab League and a spiritual father of the PLO, was a close collaborator with Nazi Germany and personally met with Adolf Hitler. In a radio broadcast from Berlin he called upon Muslims to kill Jews wherever they could find them. The SS leader Heinrich Himmler said to propaganda minister Josef Goebbels that Islam was "a very practical and attractive religion for soldiers."

In The Second World War, Vol. I, Winston Churchill wrote about Adolf Hitler's autobiography Mein Kampf: "Here was the new Koran of faith and war: turgid, verbose, shapeless, but pregnant with its message."

Following the Cold War, the West was stuck with a large fifth column in our media and academia of people who were disappointed after the sudden collapse of the alternative to capitalism. They have decided to pursue the course of a gradual transformation of society through the education system and through destroying the family structure. The radicals have renewed hope of a violent upheaval. With the mass importation of Muslims, who have displayed such a wonderful talent for violence, and with rising ethnic tensions within the West, maybe they can finally get the armed revolution they were longing for.

2.69 The closing of civilisation in Europe

Europe's current problems are entirely self-inflicted. Not Islam is to blame. Secularism is.

2.70 Give the Nobel Peace Prize to Ayaan Hirsi Ali

The greatest challenge to world peace right now is global Jihad. I therefore suggest that the next Peace Prize should be awarded to Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

Since members of national assemblies and parliaments can nominate candidates for the Prize, I hereby challenge MPs from the Progress Party in my country, or MPs from any infidel nation, to nominate Hirsi Ali. Other alternatives can be mentioned, too. Ibn Warraq, Ali Sina and Wafa Sultan are all worthy recipients of the Prize for their work and for championing the rights of one of the most abused and oppressed groups of people on the planet: Former Muslims who defy the traditional death penalty for leaving Islam.

I would like my country to be remembered for something other than awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to Yasser Arafat or for sponsoring the Palestinian government and their terrorist cronies.

2.71 Nobel Peace Prize awarded for appeasement of Jihad ... again
By Fjordman

Granting this year's Nobel Peace Prize to Finnish diplomat Martti Ahtisaari, known for his role in establishing a Jihadist state in Kosovo, makes the Peace Prize even more of a joke than it already was.

2.72 Green is the new Red — Stop Enviro-Communism!

You might know them as environmentalists, enviro-communists, eco-Marxists, neo-Communists or eco-fanatics. They all claim they want to save the world from global warming but their true agenda is to contribute to create a world government led by the UN.

2.73 Consolidating the moderate cultural conservative forces of Europe

The essence of consolidation for all European cultural conservative is:
1. Defining who we are and whom we are willing to include or exclude
2. Describing the problem and what we want fixed
3. Conclusions/Solutions/The way ahead

2.74 Organisational strategy for phase 1: better communication and cooperation among cultural conservative groups

Cultural Marxists/multiculturalists used sociology, social psychology, linguistics, and a subtle understanding of human motivation to get into our heads and change the way we processed reality. Ending cultural Marxist/multiculturalist dominance will require us to undo the vast memetic and ontological damage they've wrought on two entire generations of Europeans.

2.75 Copying Marxist organisational strategies and networks — locally, nationally and internationally

The following study was conducted in Norway but many of the results and findings apply locally, nationally and internationally.

2.76 Public opposition to Islamisation translated into success for political parties

In the country where the public is the most opposed to Islamisation, Greece, there is no successful populist right party, but in two of the three Scandinavian countries where the public is the least opposed to Islamisation, there is such a party. Opposition to Islamisation is widespread in all Western European countries. Why is this opposition not translated into success for anti-immigrant parties in countries like Sweden, Germany and the UK? Germany is a special case. The country still suffers from severe psychological trauma and is simply unable to mount any form of political defence.

2.77 Cultural conservative/nationalist rhetorical strategies

Using appropriate rhetoric is essential in communicating a message successfully. If you use the word "race" you are basically contributing to committing character assassination of yourself or will contribute to self-defeat of the organisational goals you are representing.

Multiculturalism has never been about tolerance. It is an anti-Western hate ideology championed as an instrument for unilaterally dismantling European culture. As such, it is an evil ideology bent on an entire culture's eradication, and we, the peoples of Europe, have not just a right, but a duty to resist it. The key is preserving our reputational shields using strategic rhetoric.

2.78 US and European nationalist rhetorical differences

The ongoing US cultural war is fundamentally different from the European and the rhetoric clearly reflects the differences. You cannot and should not mix the European struggle with the US struggle and therefore should not use similar arguments when discussing the two struggles.

2.79 Educating the European patriots who lacks ideological confidence

It is extremely important that the cultural conservatives/patriots/nationalists in Europe who are ideologically confident take responsibility and educate/encourage the nonconfident nationalists.

Approximately 70% of Western European males would sacrifice their lives to prevent Europe from being conquered by Islam.

2.80 Three-point guide to convert your right wing blog/site to a newspaper/magazine with national distribution

2.81 The strategy of Western survivalists
By Fjordman

If or when the European Union collapses and multiculturalism is defeated across the Western world, we need to stage public trials against the creators of Eurabia and the lies continuously told by our media and academia. They need to be exposed as evil and politically crushed.

2.82 Christianity, pros and cons
By Fjordman

The Christian-non-Christian divide is perhaps the most difficult divide to overcome within the West today. I’m struggling with this myself. Some of the criticism of Christianity, or at least the way many Western Christians are behaving now, is legitimate.

Over the past few centuries, Christianity has stripped itself of its pagan accretions. In the process, it has become as much a threat to ourselves and our loved ones as Marxism used to be, if not more so.

2.83 The Church — part of the problem or part of the solution?
By Fjordman

Although not a religious person myself, I am usually in favor of a revitalisation of Christianity in Europe. However, I sometimes have my doubts when I see how many, too many, church leaders consistently end up on the wrong side of issues related to Islam and Muslim immigration. Christians need to understand that there can be no peace or understanding with the Islamic world. They want to subdue us, pure and simple.

2.84 Thou shalt hate Christianity and Judaism
By Fjordman

As a non-religious person, but still one that acknowledges and respects the impact of Judeo-Christian thinking on Western culture, I have warned against naive Christian compassion related to Muslim immigration, as well as a disturbing tendency among too many Christian organisations to ally themselves with Muslims. But the most useful allies Muslims have in the West tend to be found among the non-religious crowd.

The British Broadcasting Corporation is dominated by Left-leaning liberals who are anti-American and biased against Christianity, but sensitive to the feelings of Muslims.

The First Commandment of multiculturalism is: Thou shalt hate Christianity and Judaism. Multiculturalists also hate nation states, and they even hate the Enlightenment, by insisting that non-Western cultures should be above scrutiny.

The philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer was an atheist. Yet according to him, it was the Christian idea of God that permitted Europeans to believe that the universe was a rational cosmos.

Lee Harris: "Human beings will have their gods — and modern reason cannot alter this. Can even the most committed atheist be completely indifferent to the imaginary gods that the other members of his community continue to worship?"

Theodore Dalrymple: "Discipline without freedom leads to misery, but freedom without discipline leads to chaos, shallowness, and misery of another kind."

As long as there is separation between religion and state, those of us who don't have any religious belief should prefer religions which tend to create reasonable and prosperous communities. Our traditional Judeo-Christian religions have proven this capability. Islam never has, and probably never will.

2.85 A future Christian identity for Europe?
By Kyle Spotswood

Within Christian political thought there has been traditionally a distinction, if not a separation, of the institution of the state and the institution of the church. There are various Christian political theories which outline how the state and the church should relate. Christian political thought cannot concede that the secular realm should be in the hands of a godless ideology. Christianity transforms the very understanding of politics, for politics is never about domination, it is about service.

2.86 Conflict avoidance and how to avoid it
By Brett Stevens

The hardest thing about being a small hominid is that you run the risk, at any moment, of screwing up and getting killed. For this reason, most of human history has dealt with conflict resolution and ways to get people going in different directions to work together. But over the years, we go from conflict resolution to conflict avoidance, meaning that we no longer seek working solutions, but to stop the fighting. We assume the fighting is the source of the disagreement, and not the other way around.

2.87 Western, modern countries that never adopted multiculturalism — Japan, South Korea and Taiwan

Japan's and South Korea's post-World War II forty-year economic growth surge without immigration has always been an embarrassment to the immigration and multiculturalism enthusiasts.

China is a monocultural country, just like African nations and a majority of countries in the Islamic world. While a significant number of citizens in Islamic or Muslim countries are directly hostile to Europeans, Chinese are usually just after your money.

2.88 Democracy not working
By Fjordman

Currently, the democratic system is in my view not working properly in any Western country. It is more or less dead in Western Europe, where most of the real power has been transferred to the unelected organs of the European Union. Virtually all Western countries have lost control over their borders. This is not a sustainable situation. You can call your political system a democracy, a dictatorship, a republic, a monarchy or whatever you want, but a country that does not control its territory will eventually die.

Any political system must first and foremost ensure the survival, the continued physical existence, of the community it serves. After that comes ensuring the prosperity and liberty of this community in the best possible way. However, when I look at the situation in Western countries today, I cannot see that democracy always ensures our liberty or prosperity, and in many cases it functions so poorly that it threatens our very survival.

2.89 The Rape of Europe — emigration of indigenous Europeans?

The German author Henryk M. Broder told the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant that young Europeans who love freedom better emigrate. Europe as we know it will no longer exist 20 years from now. Broder is convinced that the Europeans are not willing to oppose Islamisation. As Broder is sixty years old he is not going to emigrate himself. But he urged young people to get out and "move to Australia or New Zealand. That is the only option they have if they want to avoid the plagues that will turn the old continent uninhabitable."

2.90 Suggestions for the future
By Fjordman

How should we respond to the threats our civilisation is facing? First of all, ordinary citizens should arm themselves immediately since crime and violence is spreading fast throughout the Western world. Second, we need to reclaim pride in our heritage, which has been systematically taken away from us in recent generations, and restore a proper teaching of this in our education system. We should assume that the mass media and our leaders are not telling us the full truth about the scale and consequences of Muslim immigration.

2.91 What do we fight for?
By Fjordman

I have tried to contribute to a new vocabulary by coining the word "Caucasophobia" for anti-white racism, and have suggested the term "self-termination" for organised Western self-loathing and the Western policy of unilaterally dismantling our own culture.

We are against Sharia and Jihad, but what are we for? What is Western civilisation? What exactly sets it apart from others and makes it worth keeping?

I would personally say that the emphasis on the individual is our most defining trait as a civilisation. Both Muslims and internal collectivists hate our individualism the most, because it stands in the way of their ideologies. This is why they go to great lengths to smash it and replace it with group thinking. However, even our individualism can potentially be carried into such extremes that it can become a problem. Individuals still need to feel part of something greater and enduring, or society will be left unable to defend itself.

Another Western trait is a non-fatalistic outlook on the world and a belief in the ability of individuals to affect their own future, combined with linear thinking versus circular thinking, a high value placed on rationality versus emotionalism and last, but not least, curiosity — wanting to know how things tick.

I still remember the first time I read the Koran. I soon discovered how intolerant it was, but my first impression was actually not that it was violent, but that it was remarkably incoherent and difficult to read. It’s frequently self-contradictory, and Allah is portrayed as an unpredictable god. The Bible is more structured and with a higher literary quality than the Koran, even to a non-religious person.

2.92 Who are we, who are our enemies — the cost of historical amnesia
By Fjordman

The Jihad, the Islamic so-called Holy War, has been a fact of life in Europe, Asia, Africa and the Near and Middle East for more than 1300 years ...

2.93 A European Declaration of Independence
By Fjordman

We, the citizens of the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Ireland, Hungary, (fill in the blanks) demand that the following steps are taken immediately:

We demand that our national governments should immediately and without delay pull their countries out of the European Union, which should be dismantled entirely.

We demand that all documents regarding the Euro-Arab Dialogue and the creation of the Eurabian networks for "Euro-Mediterranean cooperation" between European countries and Arab countries be published and explained in their full significance to the general public.

We demand that all financial support to the Palestinian Authority should cease immediately. It is proven beyond any doubt that this has in the past been used to finance campaigns of Jihad terrorism against Jews in Israel and against Christians in territories under PA control.

We demand that the ideology of multiculturalism should immediately be removed from all government policies and school curricula, and that the state should adopt a policy of supporting the continuation of the cultural heritage and traditions of the indigenous populations.

We demand that all Muslim immigration in whatever form should be immediately and completely halted, and that our authorities take a long break from mass immigration in general until such a time when law and order has been reestablished in our major cities.

If these demands are not fully implemented, if the European Union isn't dismantled, multiculturalism isn't rejected and Muslim immigration isn't stopped, we, the peoples of Europe, will stop paying taxes and take the appropriate measures to protect our own security and ensure our national survival.

2.94 Conservatives discussing future solutions for Europe

Many moderate cultural conservatives have suggested that banning Sharia will solve all our problems and force the Muslims to integrate. Unfortunately, Islam is a lot more resilient than most people can comprehend.

We can force temporary secularisation on the Muslims but eventually the demands for more Sharia will resurface. And by then they will be in majority and can democratically do whatever they want. The only way we can then prevent Sharia law from being implemented as the only standard will be to suppress the Muslim majority through military force.

We, the cultural conservative and anti-fascists of Europe, must do everything possible to defend democracy and freedom and prevent a fascist dictatorship by seizing power and enforce a harsh but just democracy. This can only be accomplished by overthrowing the current Western European multiculturalist regimes by seizing power through armed resistance and a military coup when the time is right.

I predict one of the four scenarios for Western Europe:
1. Islam will reform. This is unlikely.
2. Our countries will become Muslim.
3. Several mini-Pakistans will be created all over Europe.
4. All Muslims will be deported.

In scenarios 2-4, civil war will be unavoidable in Western Europe.

2.95 Islamisation of Europe — possible outcomes
By Daniel Pipes

The default assumption of most Europeans is that somehow the European-Muslim relationship will work out. There may be problems today, but in the future it will be resolved. And yet I can't see the sources of that optimism. If one looks at Muslims living in Europe one finds retreat rather than engagement. The children of the immigrants are more hostile toward existing European civilisation than are the immigrants themselves. On the European side, one finds increasing worry, concern, fear of the Muslim presence. So the hope that everyone will get along seems to be not based on reality.

2.96 From the death of multiculturalism
By Fjordman

We have already passed the point of no return for serious conflicts caused by Muslim immigration. Anything we do now is damage limitation. The most civilised thing we can do is to implement a policy of containment of the Islamic world. This includes stopping Muslim immigration, but also making our countries Islam-unfriendly.

Islam isn't the cause of Europe's weakness but rather a secondary infection. The Islamic threat could have the effect of saving Europe from herself. Maybe Jihad will trigger a new Renaissance in the West.

2.97 Europe heading for civil war
By Fjordman

The possibility of civil strife in the West caused by runaway immigration is no longer just theoretical. Muslim blogs are calling for violence against the Jews, the whites and the well-to-do: "We must burn France, as Hamas will burn Israel."

The growth of the Islamic population is explosive. According to some, one out of three babies born in France is now a Muslim. Around 70% of French prisoners are Muslims. Hundreds of Muslim ghettos are already de facto following sharia, not French law. Within 20 years, one person out of four in France will be Muslim, and almost certainly poor and angry. The population will change. People with a high level of productivity will choose exile. People with a low level of productivity will immigrate. Jews and Christians will leave. Muslims will arrive.

We are witnessing the last spasms of the Eurabian Union. Western Europe will change over the coming generation as much as Eastern Europe following the fall of the Berlin Wall. There will be the downfall and disintegration of an anti-democratic, bureaucratic superstate, the European Union instead of the Soviet Union.

Europe may not be finished yet, but she will go through a painful period of transition.

The population movements we are witnessing now are the largest and fastest in human history. In Europe, they can only be compared to the period often referred to as the Migration Period following the disintegration of the Roman Empire.

There are several possible scenarios:

1. Eurabia
Europe will cease to be a Western, democratic continent, and will become an appendix to the Arab world. Eurabia will become a global center for Jihad activities, as the dhimmi taxpayers and infidel Western technology give a boost to the Ummah.

2. War
In the event of war, there will be mutual ethnic cleansing and Muslims will seize parts of Western Europe. Many of our cultural treasures will burn. Perhaps this new Pakistan in the heart of Europe will be the source of constant instability and the staging ground for Jihad incursions into infidel areas.

Europe could become a major battlefield in an Islamic or Multicultural world war. A world war is already simmering, with Muslims clashes against Russia, Europe, Israel, China, India, the USA and Southeast Asia. Once the fighting starts in Europe, it could spread outside the continent and ignite a world war.

3. Western Rebirth in Europe
Perhaps the Islamic threat will force the West to rethink its values and regain its strength. Europe could repel Islam. Europe will go through a turbulent period of revival and emerge chastened.

2.98 Are all European men weak minded cowards or are they just brainwashed?

Vladimir Putin: "Western Europe is heading in a direction where they are going to become colonies of their former colonies."

Europe is heading towards cultural and demographical suicide due to the absence of nationalistic doctrines. Nationalism is the antithesis of multiculturalism/internationalism. In order for nationalism to succeed, multiculturalism must be deconstructed and vice versa.

Europeans are concerned about what effects Islam will have on their societies in the future. We are slowly realising how our own elites have betrayed us and continue to do so. We are learning that they are systematically selling the European peoples into Muslim slavery as they continue to allow ongoing demographic warfare.

2.99 The self-defeat of the United States By Fjordman

Caroline Glick on surviving in a post-American world:

Like it or not, the United States of America is no longer the world's policeman. The USA currently looks more like a defeated nation than the world's sole remaining superpower. Americans will soon have their hands full with problems of their own and will be in no position to assist anyone.

2.100 Continued discussion on US-European relations

European vitality has been suppressed under the American hegemony. European conservatism is totally unacceptable under the current world order. As long as America has troops in Germany, there is no choice for Europe about whom to rely on. America has shouldered the legacy of the British empire as the world police.

Both Americans and Europeans have a lot to learn about their real roots and identity. America and Europe should not be seen as two separate and opposing entities but two things in symbiosis. America is indeed the empire of the Enlightenment. A leftist empire will always be in denial about being an empire at all, as America evidently is.

The tipping point will come when living with Muslims becomes more trouble than living without Muslims. You can bet the farm that this point will be reached. Islam assures this outcome and there is very little that Muslim nations can do to avert it. They have neither the strategic resources nor sufficiently developed military doctrine to prevail over an aroused and angry West.

2.101 Preserve or replace the European monarchies?

2.102 Not a war between capitalism and socialism but a cultural war between nationalism and internationalism

2.103 Democracy needs a Reformation
By Ohmyrus

Why should a welfare bum have the same one vote that a taxpayer has? Why should a drug pusher have the same one vote as a Mother Theresa? Why should a school dropout have the same one vote as a college professor?

2.104 Future deportations of Muslims from Europe

2.105 Change of investment/education mentality in the coming decades

2.106 The ideological journey — from indoctrinated multiculturalist zealot to conservative revolutionary

When I first started on this compendium more than three years ago, I decided to cover only issues relating to Islamisation and mass-Muslim immigration out of fear of being labeled as a racist.

Our present situation is a direct result of WW2 and the cold war, of the so called Frankfurt school and the rise of cultural Marxism/multiculturalism and political correctness.

If I had met myself 12 years ago I would probably think I was an extreme and paranoid nut.

2.107 Further studies

Book 3

A Declaration of Pre-emptive War

(page 766 of 1518)

Book 3 describes a hypothetical response to a perceived threat (so called cultural Marxist/multiculturalist atrocities and the threat of Islamisation). As such, it is a fictional description regarding how it could be like if Islam would be dominant in Europe. The concept of the story/plot is based on what it would be like if certain Christian/conservative/nationalist resistance groups/individuals chose to oppose these perceived threats and enemies.

3.1 A phase of dialogue has come to an end (1955-1999)
A European Declaration of Independence
By Fjordman, March 2007

We, the citizens of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, Switzerland, Austria, Iceland, Malta and Ireland demand that the following steps are taken immediately:

We demand that our national governments should immediately and without delay pull their countries out of the European Union, which should be dismantled entirely. European citizens pay up to half of their salaries in direct or indirect taxes to their nation states. If these nations do not control their own borders nor their policies, and they don't as long as the EU exists, those taxes are a scam. National taxes require national borders. If our national borders are not enforced, we have no obligation whatsoever to pay national taxes.

We demand that all documents regarding the Euro-Arab Dialogue and the creation of the Eurabian networks for "Euro-Mediterranean cooperation" between European countries and Arab countries since the 1970s, as documented by Bat Ye'or's work on Eurabia, are published and explained in their full significance to the general public. Those chiefly responsible for this — one of the greatest betrayals in the history of Western civilisation — should stand trial, followed by a period of general de-Eurabification of our laws and regulations.

We demand that all financial support to the Palestinian Authority should cease immediately. It is proven beyond any doubt that this has in the past been used to finance campaigns of Jihad terrorism against Jews in Israel and against Christians in territories under PA control. A public statement in support of Israel against Muslim aggression should be issued, and the money that has previously been awarded to Palestinians should be allocated partly to Israel's defence, partly to establish a Global Infidel Defence Fund with the stated goal of disseminating information about Muslim persecution of non-Muslims worldwide.

We demand that the ideology of multiculturalism should immediately be removed from all government policies and school curricula, and that the state should adopt a policy of supporting the continuation of the cultural heritage and traditions of the indigenous populations. Multiculturalism has never been about tolerance. It is an anti-Western hate ideology championed as an instrument for unilaterally dismantling European culture. As such, it is an evil ideology bent on an entire culture's eradication, and we, the peoples of Europe, have not just a right, but a duty to resist it and an obligation to pass on our heritage to future generations.

We demand that all Muslim immigration in whatever form should be immediately and completely halted ...

3.2 Charges against all cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites of Europe
(category A and B traitors)

A person who planned, instigated, ordered, committed or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation or execution of a crime referred to in the following articles shall be held individually responsible for the crime.

The official position of any accused person, whether as head of state or government or as a responsible government official, shall not relieve such person of criminal responsibility or mitigate punishment.

The charges ...

3.3 The European resistance movement/Indigenous rights movement

PCCTS, Knights Templar offer a full pardon to the Western European multiculturalist regimes, the MA 100 alliance (political parties) and all category A and B individual traitors if they capitulate to our military forces by January 1, 2020.

We, the National Resistance Movements of Western Europe, are hereby giving you the chance to exonerate yourselves if the following demands are met.

3.4 Why armed resistance against the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe is the only rational approach

Multiculturalism is an insidious weapon. All ties to family, community, and one's people as a whole are destroyed. The antithesis of multiculturalism is moral, religious, and cultural solidarity among the people of a nation. A necessary first step toward recovery is to look at politics, social policy, and government emanating from Brussels with new eyes ...

Quick summary

1. We are subject to cultural Marxist/multiculturalist institutionalised ideological coercion and brainwashing through government institutions.

2. More or less every media organisation is propagating cultural Marxist/multiculturalist principles. There is no freedom of speech in Europe.

3. The cultural Marxists/multiculturalists systematically import millions of voters, which increases their political position from year to year.

4. Right wing political parties fight an uphill battle. Cultural conservatives should initiate armed resistance against the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist establishment.

3.5 A new era has come — the time for dialogue is now over

The cultural Marxists have for more than 50 years disregarded the will of the majority of Europeans. The time for dialogue is now over. The time for armed resistance has come.

The most basic human right is to defend oneself against deliberate cultural attacks or even an institutionalised cultural genocide of unprecedented historical proportions. It is not just a right but a duty for all Europeans to defend oneself against such atrocities through armed struggle. We call upon you, fellow Europeans. Stop complaining and instead fight by our side.

We, the patriotic Europeans, will continue to effectively revolt against the Nazis of our time: the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites, who are leading us to the cultural slaughterhouse by selling us into Muslim slavery. We have lost the democratical struggle to defend Europe from deliberate cultural annihilation. As more people realise this we will see an increasing number of Europeans joining our ranks to fight by our side. Armed struggle is the only rational approach.

We, the free indigenous peoples of Europe, hereby declare a pre-emptive war on all cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites of Western Europe. And we have a very clear message for you:

We know who you are, where you live and we are coming for you. If not today, then tomorrow, if not in 10 years, then in 50 years. We are in the process of flagging every single multiculturalist traitor in Western Europe. You will be punished for your treasonous acts against Europe, and Europeans. We will ensure that all category A and B traitors, the enablers of Islamisation and the destroyers of our cultures, nations and societies, will be executed and your property expropriated.

It will take us up to 70 years to win, but there is no doubt in our minds that we will eventually succeed. Quite ironically, the ongoing Islamisation that you so actively facilitate will be your downfall. Soon enough, the desperate cries of the European masses will indicate that your Multiculturalist regimes are near their end.

The Western European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes will fall before 2083, of that you can be certain.

3.6 Explanation of the European civil war — phases 1, 2 and 3

Phase of dialogue (1955-1999) ...

3.7 There are four potential outcomes of phases 2 and 3

1. Creation of mini-Pakistans within Europe. This must be stopped at all costs.
2. Reformation of Islam. This scenario is very unlikely.
3. Coup. This scenario is the preferred outcome.
4. Civil war

3.8 Differentiating between and dealing with category A, B and C traitors

One of the foundational problems in Europe today is that the multiculturalists and the suicidal humanists lie to everyone to preserve comfortable illusions. Political correctness is a mandatory lie in European societies.

The multiculturalists have traditionally cheered the most violent totalitarian movements in other parts of the world as "freedom fighters" ...

3.9 Demands/requests/pleas to our national military commands

Introduction — The European national military commands and the Islamisation of Europe

3.10 Assimilation policy/demands/offer for Muslim individuals living in Europe
(this offer will expire on January 1, 2020)

The following assimilation policy is to be accepted by all Muslims who currently live on European soil and want to continue to live in Europe.

1. Convert to Christianity
2. Name change
3. No mother tongue or Arabic
4. All mosques and Islamic centers will be demolished or converted

A European military order re-emerges — in praise of the new knighthood

3.11 The history of Pauperes commilitones Christi Templique Solomonici
(Knights Templar)

The Knights Templar organisation was founded in 1119 by knights sworn to protect Christian pilgrims visiting the Holy Land after the crusaders recaptured Jerusalem from the Muslims in 1099.

3.12 Re-founding of Pauperes commilitones Christi Templique Solomonici
(PCCTS, the Knights Templar)

3.13 Founding principles of the Order/Tribunal


3.23 The cruel nature of our operations

As a Justiciar Knight you are operating as a jury, judge and executioner on behalf of all free Europeans. Never forget that it is not only your right to act against the tyranny of the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites of Europe, it is your duty to do so. There are situations in which cruelty is necessary, and refusing to apply necessary cruelty is a betrayal of the people whom you wish to protect.


3.29 How to stay motivated for longer periods — perform a daily mental check

Being a Justiciar Knight is not for everyone. You are normally required to plan absolutely everything alone. Fight alone to see your mission through and you are likely to die alone with half of your city's system protectors hunting you. However, I have never in my life felt that I have done anything more meaningful than what I am doing now.


3.38 Services offered by European criminal syndicates/networks

All criminal groups are prepared to resort to violence when necessary to commit robberies, enforce protection rackets or secure drug deals. Firearms, which are seen as a tool and a statement of intent, are a priority.

3.39 Sending announcements before an operation

You will need access to a computer with internet connection to use as propaganda outlets before your operation.


3.47 Avoiding apprehension/arrest and death

If you are unwilling to martyr yourself for the cause, then the PCCTS, Knights Templar is not for you.

3.48 Quick summary — overview of the planning and operational phases for your mission


Sabotage operations

3.54 Sabotage operations — the most efficient ways to cripple the current Western European multiculturalist regimes

Before we start discussing strategies for sabotage, we have to agree on the foundational premise for the valuation of sabotage over shock attacks.

The common factor for both types of operations (shock or sabotage) is that we must keep civilian casualties at an absolute minimum.


3.61 After a successful operation — countering the misinformation campaign from the multiculturalist government

The Japanese and South Korean societies and to a certain degree the Taiwanese model contain a majority of all the political principles we seek to restore. They represent many of the European classical conservative principles with modern twists. Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are today the most peaceful societies due to their monocultural model.

We view the current regimes of Western Europe as totalitarian Nazi regimes. We condemn imperialistic thought and we condemn genocide and violence in general. We have no territorial claims that will violate any sovereign European or other civilised country, the exception being our Middle Eastern foreign policy plan. This involves a Crusade. Hindus and Buddhists are considered brothers in our common fight against Jihadi imperialism, atrocities and genocides.

3.62 Grand Master Overseer — the overseer organisation

3.63 Why bother with honouring fallen martyrs and living heroes of our struggle?

It is essential and extremely important to honour living heroes of our struggle and to ensure that fallen martyrs are commemorated.

3.64 Knights Templar orders, commendations, uniform, title, tombstone and relevant information


3.72 The PCCTS, Knights Templar Oath — Ordination Rite

The purpose of the rite is to create and formalise your commitment to the cause of the PCCTS, Knights Templar. You are also literally making a blood pact with your ancestors, with past martyrs, and with God. You are offering them a central part of your very being in exchange for the gift of immortality and a place in the eternal kingdom. You pledge allegiance to the principles of the PCCTS, Knights Templar, to fellow Justiciar Knights, to your people, the wishes of your ancestors and to God. Your oath will commit you to act selflessly as you offer them devoted service to the death.

3.73 Future compensation arrangements for European members of the resistance movement

The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. If there are absolutely no incentives to do the right thing how can we expect enough individuals to sacrifice themselves for the greater good?

3.74 Right of revolution

U.S. Declaration of Independence

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is in the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organising its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right of "the people" to bear arms as part of a well regulated militia. If the people have a right to overthrow a despotic government then they have a right to possess the practical means to do so.

The Founding Fathers gave Americans the Second Amendment not to protect them from criminals, but to allow them to rebel against their government should it be necessary. George Washington supported the stance that armed revolts every so often were necessary to keep the government from stagnation, corruption, or deterioration.

3.75 Non-violent resistance — civil disobedience/economic sabotage

Every patriotic European has a duty to contribute to the fall of the current cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regime through any and all means necessary.

3.76 National intelligence agencies

3.77 A request to the police forces (system protectors) of Western Europe

More than 60% of the police officers in Europe sympathise with our cause and around 90% empathise with it. Our cause is to strike the enablers that are currently facilitating the Islamic colonization of our countries.

3.78 Young Europeans (YE) movement

3.79 Various info

European political solutions for the future

3.80 Reforming the European Church

A majority of Protestants, me included, have lost all respect for the Protestant church. An increasing number of European Protestants are converting to Catholicism.

3.81 The future of European Christendom

Embracing Christendom will be voluntary. People who chose to be atheists will enjoy the same rights. The school curriculum and government policies will propagate cultural conservative policies.

We cannot have a Vatican that trembles at the feet of the Islamic Ummah or a Vatican that facilitates its own destruction without a fight. We must therefore rid the Vatican of corrupt and even suicidal members and ensure that we have Church leaders who believe in a sustainable and confident European Christendom. We need a Christendom that believes in the fundamental concept of self-defense and that has the will and ambition to survive. We need Christian leaders who are willing to call for defensive Crusades if any of our Christian brothers are threatened by Jihad in the future.

The Church and church leaders will not be allowed to influence non-cultural political matters in any way. This includes science, research and development, and all non-cultural areas which will benefit Europe in the future.

3.82 Patriarchy will be re-implemented

The return of the patriarchy
By Phillip Longman

For more than a generation now, well-fed, healthy, peaceful populations around the world have been producing too few children to avoid population decline. That is true even though dramatic improvements in infant and child mortality mean that far fewer children are needed today (only about 2.1 per woman in modern societies) to avoid population loss. Birthrates are falling far below replacement levels in one country after the next.

Patriarchy does not simply mean that men rule. Indeed, it is a particular value system that not only requires men to marry but to marry a woman of proper station. It competes with many other male visions of the good life, and for that reason alone is prone to come in cycles. Yet before it degenerates, it is a cultural regime that serves to keep birthrates high among the affluent, while also maximizing parents' investments in their children. No advanced civilization has yet learned how to endure without it.

Falling fertility is responsible for many financial and economic problems that dominate today's headlines. The long-term financing of social security schemes, private pension plans, and healthcare systems has little to do with people living longer. Gains in life expectancy at older ages have actually been quite modest, and the rate of improvement in the United States has diminished for each of the last three decades. Instead, the falling ratio of workers to retirees is overwhelmingly caused by workers who were never born. As governments raise taxes on a dwindling working-age population to cover the growing burdens of supporting the elderly, young couples may conclude they are even less able to afford children than their parents were, thereby setting off a new cycle of population aging and decline.

These circumstances are leading to the emergence of a new society whose members will disproportionately be descended from parents who rejected the social tendencies that once made childlessness and small families the norm. These values include an adherence to traditional, patriarchal religion, and a strong identification with one's own folk or nation.

Patriarchal societies come in many varieties and evolve through different stages. What they have in common are customs and attitudes that collectively serve to maximize fertility and parental investment in the next generation. Of these, among the most important is the stigmatization of "illegitimate" children. Under patriarchy, "bastards" and single mothers cannot be tolerated because they undermine male investment in the next generation. Illegitimate children do not take their fathers' name, and so their fathers, even if known, tend not to take any responsibility for them. By contrast, "legitimate" children become a source of either honour or shame to their fathers and the family line. Patriarchy also leads men to keep having children until they produce at least one son.

A society organized on such principles may well degenerate over time into misogyny, and eventually sterility, as occurred in both ancient Greece and Rome. In more recent times, the patriarchal family has also proved vulnerable to the rise of capitalism, which profits from the diversion of female labour from the house to the workplace. But as long as the patriarchal system avoids succumbing to these threats, it will produce a greater quantity of children, and arguably children of higher quality, than do societies organized by other principles.

Today we associate patriarchy with the hideous abuse of women and children, with poverty and failed states. Yet these are examples of insecure societies that have degenerated into male tyrannies. Under a true patriarchal system, fathers have strong reason to take an active interest in the children their wives bear. That is because, when men come to see themselves, and are seen by others, as upholders of a patriarchal line, how those children turn out directly affects their own rank and honour. Under patriarchy, maternal investment in children also increases, with more children receiving more attention from their mothers, who have few other ways of finding meaning in their lives. A society that presents women with essentially three options — be a nun, be a prostitute, or marry a man and bear children — has stumbled upon a highly effective way to reduce the risk of demographic decline.

Patriarchy may have its privileges, but they may pale in comparison to the joys of bachelorhood in a luxurious society. Women also have reason to grow weary of patriarchy, particularly when men no longer uphold their patriarchal duties.

The great difference in fertility rates between secular individualists and religious or cultural conservatives augurs a vast, demographically driven change in modern societies. History is full of revolts of children against parents.

Advanced societies are growing more patriarchal, whether they like it or not. In addition to the greater fertility of conservative segments of society, the rollback of the welfare state forced by population aging and decline will give these elements an additional survival advantage, and therefore spur even higher fertility. As governments hand back functions they once appropriated from the family, notably support in old age, people will find that they need more children to insure their golden years, and they will seek to bind their children to them through inculcating traditional religious values akin to the Bible's injunction to honour thy mother and father.

Societies that are today the most secular and the most generous with their underfunded welfare states will be the most prone to religious revivals and a rebirth of the patriarchal family. The absolute population of Europe and Japan may fall dramatically, but the remaining population will be adapted to a new environment in which no one can rely on government to replace the family.

3.83 Re-creating the traditional patriarchal social structures

When we, the cultural conservatives, seize political and military control of Western European countries, we will re-establish patriarchal structures. Doing so will ensure the survival of the nuclear family.

Prior to the 1960s, abstinence from premarital sex was considered the official standard for men and women. But a double standard, whereby sexual intercourse before marriage is permissible for males but not for females, was widely practiced. In the 1960s, young people rejected the double standard and set more egalitarian standards.

With increasing emphasis on egalitarian gender-role conditioning, many men are moving away from the stereotypical sexual aggressor attitudes of the traditional male and are looking for the expressive qualities of mutual love and caring in their sexual relationships. Similarly, women look for equality in their sexual relationships where they are active participants rather than passive objects. In traditional relationships, men had autonomy and authority while women had neither. Women were expected to be submissive and subservient, without the right to their own opinions, feelings or needs. In modern relationships based on equality of gender roles, female and male autonomy are of equal importance, and intimacy, the mutual sharing of the being of each partner, is of vital importance to the continual development and deepening of mutual trust and love.

3.84 Knights Templar and ethnocentrism

Knights Templar has three primary functions:
1. To act as a pan-European Crusader Movement
2. To act as an Indigenous Rights Movement
3. To act as a War Crimes Tribunal

The Nordic theory is the ideology of racial superiority which claims that the Nordic race constitute a master race because of an innate capacity for initiative, long term planning and leadership. The reasoning for this theory is that the Nordic peoples has been forced to, due to the cold arctic climate, to logistically plan ahead for up to 6 months per year to be able to survive the cold winters. The weak elements of the tribe perished, leaving only the strong and intelligent. It is claimed that the descendants are superior when it comes to initiative, long term planning and intelligence compared to people who live in warm climates.

Nordicism came to be a major influence on Nazism. Multiculturalism is a reactionary ideology to Nordicism. The Nordics inhabit the countries around the North and Baltic Seas, and include not only the great Scandinavian and Teutonic groups, but also other representatives of Aryan language and culture.

The Nordic tribes and the rest of the European tribes are on a course to extinction because of multiculturalist facilitation of Islamic demographic warfare.

Don't let the multiculturalists define what racism is or isn’t. Keeping an African against his will in your basement as a slave is racism. Loving your extended family/your ethnic group and fighting for ethnic and/or indigenous rights does not make you a racist.

I don't see why we shouldn't actively strive for the establishment of a Nordic League propagating Nordic interests, following the design of the Arab League.

I have for a long time dreaded the thought of writing an essay about this subject. It is considered politically incorrect by even many of the most dedicated conservatives and it is considered an efficient way to commit character suicide for individuals who have ambitions to appeal to the bulk of the masses in this early stage of the European civil war.

Any public figure that openly opposes race-mixing or interracial relations and instead propagate the preservation of his tribe is aggressively persecuted, ridiculed and/or ignored by the European multiculturalist regimes.

The cultural establishment, spearheaded by the entertainment industry and the MSM, are doing everything they can to glorify and propagate race-mixing by creating movies, series and other coverage which illustrate happy interracial couples. Very few people are buying into this.

An overwhelming number of ethnic groups consider racial/ethnic purity to be the very center of their cultural identity. Those familiar with Taiwanese, South Korean, and Japanese culture can attest to that. Arab countries are very concerned with racial/ethnic purity. This is so evident that non-Arab Muslims are considered second-class Muslims.

To prevent the extinction of the Nordic tribes, the key is to liberalise biotechnology laws and to commercialise and promote reprogenetics while there is still a sustainable selection of Nordics of 99% purity left. Not only will we have the option to secure our survival but we will be able to purify our tribe and add several IQ points to our offspring in the process.

Mass immigration, race mixing, and adoption of non-Europeans harm the unity of our tribe. Corruption and crime are natural results of a lack of social cohesion. When you add Islam to the mix, the worst-case scenario is changed from a dysfunctional country to total defeat.

A stable and prosperous country that can offer its citizens solid welfare depends on:
1. No Islam
2. An ethnic homogenous people
3. An educated people with a high average IQ
4. Cultural conservative policies
5. A free market

If there is one historical figure and past Germanic leader I hate, it is Adolf Hitler. Multiculturalism would have never been implemented in Europe if it hadn't been for NSDAP's reckless and unforgivable actions. Europe would have beautiful cultural conservative policies — very similar to the ones you now find in Japan and South Korea. Hitler almost destroyed everything with his reckless and unforgivable actions and he will forever be known as a traitor to the Nordic-Germanic tribes.

PCCTS, Knights Templar message to all minority groups and mixed individuals

Know that we, the PCCTS, Knights Templar, are not a racist organisation. Individuals of all races, providing that they are Christian, can join and fight for the Knights Templar as Justiciar Knights. Your contribution for the conservative cause will guarantee you and the loyal members of your family permanent residency in Europe. You will be embraced as a fellow citizen if you shed blood with us.

All members of minority groups will over the next few years have to make a choice. I just hope they make the right one. Their future in Europe will rely on it.

3.85 The political significance of sex in a cultural-conservative future

Sex is probably the most powerful and under analyzed motivator for man on earth. So how do we preach chastity to a mob who wants unlimited access to free sex? The answer is that we offer any and all liberals the freedom of unlimited sex in a future scenario. We must present concepts that are credible. This does not mean that our future societies will end up as anarchies. But we present concepts of chastity and chivalry at the same time.

The solution is to set up liberal zones segregated from the rest of the society. These liberal zones must be cut off from the rest of society to avoid cultural contamination. This should be a compromise we can live with.

If we fail to compromise and instead try to ram a puritan and deeply conservative way of life down everyone's throat we will only defeat ourselves. Using the sexual revolution to our advantage will contribute to our success.

3.86 Sexual ethics/sexual morality in Western Europe has been destroyed by cultural Marxism and liberalism

Sexual ethics (also referred to as sexual morality) refers to those aspects of ethics that deal with issues arising from all aspects of sexuality and human sexual behaviour. Broadly speaking, sexual ethics relates to community and personal standards relating to the conduct of interpersonal relationships.

Ethical dilemmas involving sex can appear in situations where there is a significant power difference or where there is a pre-existing professional relationship between the participants, or where consent is partial or uncertain.

The degree of breakdown in sexual ethics or sexual morality is manifested through young women's susceptibility to having one-night stands and pre-marital sex and the average number of sexual partners per woman during her lifetime. New-generation girls have a substantially less conservative view than older girls.

Sexually transmitted diseases ruin people's lives. I can only imagine how many people are suffering from STDs as a result of the current lack of sexual morals. This mentality is clearly not sustainable. European civilisation will not survive if we continue to allow the breakdown of sexual morals.

3.87 Sexually transmitted disease (STD) epidemic in Western Europe

The magnitude of the STD epidemics is a direct cause of the breakdown in sexual ethics in Western Europe and is also related to liberal third-world immigration.

Few comprehensive data exist on the costs associated with sexually transmitted infections. But the economic burden imposed by these infections is extremely high, and an increasing proportion of the costs is being borne by public sources of payment. Costs related to STDs will have a devastating impact on Western European countries in the future unless we, the cultural conservatives, manage to seize political and military control and drastically reverse the ongoing cultural suicide of Europe.

3.88 Various topics relating to social structures

A new mentality, anti-promiscuousity (ROUGH DRAFT)

An anti-promiscuousity mentality should be included in a future secular social reform agenda. Excessive sexuality is a kind of addiction. Excessive promiscuousity is the cause of many of the problems in our society. Promiscuousity should be demonised by the media.


Lookism is discrimination against or prejudice towards others based on their appearance. Lookism has received scholarly attention both from a cultural studies and an economics perspective.

Erotic capital (ROUGH DRAFT)

Erotic capital is power possessed by an individual as a result of his or her sexual attractiveness to others. It is one among other species of capital, including social capital, symbolic capital, and cultural capital.

3.89 Anti-feminist policies — Reviving the patriarchal model by deconstructing the Western European matriarchal systems

There are many sensible feminist policies. Ignore these sensible feminist policies, and instead focus on the destructive policies. Fact: 60-70% of all cultural Marxists/multiculturalists are women. The primary trait and value that a majority of women propagate is compassion.

Our current system produces broken families and prevents traditional norms based on discipline. The most direct threat to the family is divorce on demand. Sooner or later, if Western Europe is to endure, it must be brought under control. The father/patriarch must be given considerably more influence. The matriarchal supremacy within the modern households must cease to exist.

3.90 Preventing the European population decline — securing sustainability — future national reproduction policies

Western European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites are arguing that we need immigration to compensate for our population decline and the dangerously low birth rates of European women. However, they fail to admit and acknowledge that they themselves, and their policies, are the reason for the decline. And they are reluctant to implement effective measures to increase the low fertility rates.

Giving women more incentives to have children in the form of various welfare incentives, tax deductions, various incentives aimed at the nuclear family and similar incentives will not increase the fertility rate by much.

Creating surrogacy facilities in low-cost countries and state funded boarding homes domestically can only be applied in a society that isn’t bound by the paralyzing grasp of today’s cultural Marxist non-ethics.

The national goal must be to beat the currently leading oriental children (Chinese, South Korean, Japanese, and Taiwanese) in every scholastic measurement and thus achieve a system of excellence that is superior to all known systems.

The development of advanced incubator machines/artificial wombs could become an alternative (or even a substitute) to using surrogates in low-cost countries. This can be done by investing in and developing advanced neonatal intensive-care units or by developing artificial wombs.

3.91 Future democracy model and monoculturalism

The current mass-democracy model in Western Europe has paved the way for our current problems. Mass democracy has allowed cultural Marxism to hijack society’s political structures, initially through schools, universities and the media.

The re-introduction of monoculturalism will be based on practical issues and circumstances related to social cohesion and not on hate. This reintroduction of monoculturalism will resemble that of today's Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.

3.92 The rapid extinction of the Nordic genotypes

It is estimated that the Nordic genotypes will be extinct within 200 years. This is mainly due to intermarriage between Nordics and non-Nordics. There are only three ways to prevent this. One solution will be by introducing negative eugenics programs combined with ethnic segregation. We must reject negative eugenics and focus on positive eugenics or reprogenetics.

3.93 Reprogenetics and the future

Reprogenetics is a term referring to the merging of reproductive and genetic technologies expected to happen in the near future as techniques like germinal choice technology become more available and more powerful. The term was coined by Lee M. Silver, a professor of molecular biology at Princeton University, in his 1997 book Remaking Eden.

The main differences between reprogenetics and eugenics is that most eugenics programs were compulsory programs imposed upon citizens by governments trying to enact an ultimate goal. Reprogenetics, by contrast, would be pursued by individual parents, who would be trying to improve their children with the same motivations that compel them to purchase expensive education.

A World Bank of Genotypes must be considered a solidarity project, a peace project, whose goal is to prevent conflict. Anyone can choose any genotype they want from it. This project has the potential to end many conflicts once and for all, especially those related to ethnocentrism. Only the first world would be able to afford it at first.

3.94 Future economical model/public sector model/welfare program/economic zones/servant class

The ongoing European civil war is a cultural war between cultural conservatives and cultural Marxists (nationalism vs. internationalism). The fact that globalist capitalism is a destructive concept does not mean that localised capitalist mechanics are. There must always be potent incentives for individuals who create work places. A socialist or even a planned economy must be avoided at all costs.

It is unrealistic to think that there will be complete economic equality in nations with free markets. We should attempt to ensure a solid welfare program for all European citizens. Maintaining a sustainable solid welfare system depends on hard working individuals and social cohesion, i.e. a monocultural society. Welfare expenditure should not take precedence over the 20% fixed sum dedicated to science, technology, research and development.

3.95 Future Western European educational systems

All primary, secondary and high schools should be gender segregated. Gender segregation should also be considered for colleges and universities.

Whenever the distraction of boys is taken away from girls or vice versa, students no longer have to worry about how they dress, who they have to impress or who their friends are. Instead, they are able to concentrate more on academics. Also, in single sex classrooms teachers can focus on the environment in which the particular gender learns better.

The single-sex school trend is seen in other countries. Single-sex public schools are producing higher grades and test scores than co-educational schools. Separating the sexes has positive, long-term impacts that universities around Europe should consider.

Focus on excellence instead of mediocrity.

3.96 Alternative energy, scientific/technological evolution, overconsumption/pollution/overpopulation

Aim for oil independence. This will not only save the environment, it will completely devastate many Muslim countries economically.

The never-ending collective pursuit for scientific evolution and perfection should become the benchmark and essence of our existence instead of glorifying personal acquisition of wealth and physical beauty.

We should develop a brain-computer interface (BCI) that provides a direct path of communication from an external device to the brain. The goal should be to create an alternative to educational institutions.

We should legalise reproductive technologies that will allow parents to create off spring with biological improvement (reprogenetics). This must be a non-coercive form of biological improvement which will be predominantly motivated by individual competitiveness and the desire to create the best opportunities for children.

Overconsumption, pollution and overpopulation are the three problems that threaten the future of life on Earth. The three problems intersect and are interactive, but they are also separate and distinct.

What population size can our planet support? The carrying capacity is the number of individuals an environment can support without significant negative impacts to the given organism and its environment.

A European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist/suicidal humanist/capitalist globalist elite created Articles 12 and 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "It is the right of every woman/couple to reproduce and have as many children as they want ..."

There is no general consensus to the carrying capacity of the planet. Our planet should not exceed 3 billion individuals, so radical policies will have to be implemented. The primary principle must be quality over quantity.

3.97 Future aid policy — Africa — The foreign cultural Marxist aid establishment and the harm it inflicts on Africa

Foreign aid has harmed Africa and should be phased out. Trillions of USD have been channelled to Africa over the last 50 years with absolutely no positive results for the continent. Aid prevents the establishment of sustainable functioning societies. The more aid a country receives, the more it plunges into poverty and corruption.

3.98 Future crime prevention, EF anthem, Independence Day, imperialism

Crime will not be tolerated in a future cultural conservative Europe. Military campaigns will be launched with full force to break and obliterate the Albanian and Rom criminal networks (and other large European criminal networks).

The new and powerful cultural conservative European Federation should have a new anthem.

European Independence Day should be celebrated on September 11 or 12, marking the successful defence of Western Europe by the Holy League. The Battle of Vienna in 1683 should be celebrated as the Independence Day for all Western Europeans.

A future European Federation (consisting of Europe and Russia) will have all the territory/resources we will ever need to satisfy our future demands. We must not and should never attack another sovereign country. Driving out Islam from Christian lands is a defensive strategy designed to reverse decades of corrupt and suicidal European leadership. Our territorial claims (on behalf of the rightful owners) are limited to eastern and western Anatolia and the areas north and south of Israel for the benefit of Israelis and Christian minorities.

3.99 The destructive forces of the diversity/ethnic industries, comments and solutions

This is the continuation of section 2.62.

The hip-hop movement glorifies destructive role models propagating:
1. Anti-social and antiauthority views
2. Drug use, primarily hashish and marijuana
3. Anarchistic attitudes through the graffiti movement
4. Violence and gang mentality
5. Undermine positive norms

What makes young Europeans so susceptible to the hiphop mentality:
1. Big business, globalist companies
2. A social and political environment lacking nationalistic principles
3. Breakdown of the nuclear family and traditional family values
4. Media companies with absolute power to sell lifestyles
5. Lack of cultural pride resulting in lack of individual pride

3.100 Solutions for South Africa, Israel and the USA

Supremacist ethnocentrism is an evil. However, we must keep an open mind when we evaluate these issues. We cannot allow political correctness paralyze the debate.

1. The European Afrikaner/Boer genocide in South Africa The systematic genocide of Europeans in South Africa is usually referred to as the Afrikaner genocide. Nelson Mandela used to be a terrorist leader and gave personal orders to execute a bombing attack against the old apartheid regime. This is the reason why he was arrested in the first place.

2. The Israeli security fence and other security barriers Israel's security fence has cut terrorism incidents by more than 90% since its completion. The physical separation (apartheid) of the Israelis and the Muslims works as intended.

3. The demographic annihilation of the European population in the USA due to Asian, Mexican and African mass immigration

3.101 The cultural Marxist war against God and the Church in Western Europe


The greatest achievement in humanity was the moon landing, achieved by our European-American brethren. Since then, cultural Marxism has risen, infiltrated and ravaged both Western Europe and the USA. The mass-democracy model of Western Europe has become the norm in the Western world, which has cultivated the principle of mediocrity instead of continuing to pursue excellence. Europe is now a third-world country in regard to spirituality and civilizational goals.

3.102 USA — a dying European empire — the objectives of the conservative revolutionary movements


The USA initially succeeded because European Christian cultures are compatible. But to assume that millions and Asian and African immigrants, in addition to existing non-European minorities, can be assimilated with this homogenous European Christian culture is a mistake of civilizational proportions. The only thing that can solve problems of this magnitude is a coup d'état initiated by conservatives. The outcome will be a re-establishment of the USA as a European Christian country.

There are 3 primary reasons for the imminent fall of the USA:
1. Fatally declining social cohesion
2. Allowing China and other Asian countries to join the WTO
3. Peak oil

The International Monetary Fund ranking of the countries with highest GNP shows that the top 10 list is dominated by countries with an exceptional degree of social cohesion. This is usually only possible in countries with a small population.

European revolutionary conservatives believe in cultural monoculturalism and to a large degree ethnocentrism because we know that is the only proven way of preserving social cohesion levels is required to facilitate a welfare state. Without social cohesion, no welfare state. We believe that good borders makes good neighbours. We believe in democracy, but we believe that the fundamental requirement for a democracy and a welfare state requires social cohesion and a non-reformable cultural conservative framework. The USA illustrates that you cannot have social cohesion in a multicultural society.

3.103 The fall of the EUSSR, the rise of the new nationalist European world order


We, the European Revolutionary Conservatives, know very well that it will take many years, even decades before we successfully manage to consolidate to a degree where we can seize political and military power in the first Western European country. In the USA, the Tea party movement is one of the first physical, political manifestations which indicate that there is a great storm coming. The creation of similar conservative organizations, even the creation of revolutionary conservative movements such as the Knights Templar, is just another manifestation that real resistance to the EUSSR/US cultural Marxist/multiculturalist hegemony is about to materialize.

We are some of the founding fathers of the new world order. The conservative martyrs of today, both democratic and revolutionary, will be remembered and celebrated as the founding fathers when our cultural conservative world order has been established in the European world within 20-70 years.

As human beings and political activists, we are obliged to sincerely evaluate and re-evaluate all ideologies, National Socialism included. It is uncertain whether we can achieve ideological progress and success without defending principles embraced by the NS, such as monoculturalism.

Our genetic heritage is the most important cultural marker. It is a visual proof that you represent a certain culture, certain traditions, a certain identity. Many people I know who supports mass-Muslim immigration deliberately avoid living with Muslims, simply because they don't like them. But they still support mass-Muslim immigration.

3.104 Pro-African nationalism: deportation and/or segregation is the most antiracist approach


One of the reasons why all African countries are failed states is due to lack of nationalistic principles with subsequent lack of pride in their people and nation. Africans who successfully emigrate from Africa are regarded as heroes by the majority of Africans in the community they left behind. African pride cannot be established until the day we clearly tell them that Europe is off limits and all aid will cease immediately.

Consolidating Eurpean conservative organisations

3.105 A new conservatism/nationalism — Vienna school of thought

The Vienna school of thought, Crusader Nationalism, advocates a new conservatism/nationalism, a hybrid of several conservative and traditionalist directions. It is not a full-fledged ideology but can act as an alternative to the Frankfurt school of thought.

The ideological platform advocates a strict anti-Jihad/Islamic stance, which indirectly establishes a default friendly stance and support to Israel as an integral part of its foundation.

The school is named after what its supporters see as the most important battle in European history, the Battle of Vienna in 1683, where the Islamic conquest of Western Europe was prevented by the Holy League, led by John III Sobieski.

3.106 Creating patriotic youth movements in phase 1

According to MSM and the multiculturalist governments, all patriots are fascists, racists and Nazis.

The Islamisation of Europe is a result of the doctrines of multiculturalism.

We should strive to gain the moral high ground. It is required that we reject and distance ourselves from ALL 4 hate ideologies:
1. National Socialism
2. Islam
3. Communism
4. Multiculturalism

Patriotic youth groups (also referred to as street activists) are the backbone of the resistance and the creation of such political entities should be a primary goal. An intellectual club (consisting of older professionals) who rejects the notion of offering political and intellectual guidance to the youths of the society will have limited impact. A large majority of the current European conservative intellectuals are cowards and unwilling to take responsibility.

Creating patriotic youth groups is a pragmatic and necessary approach as we cannot and should not trust that our police forces and military act in our interest now or in the future. Both our police forces and military are lead by the multiculturalist traitors we wish to defeat.

The British EDL (English Defence League) has the moral high ground and can easily justify their political standpoints as they publicly oppose racism and authoritarianism.

Denmark doesn't have an EDL equivalent. Instead they have Hells Angels, a criminal organisation claiming the title defender of the Danish people. This is a typical example of a false prophet.

3.107 Consolidating moderate (non-military) European cultural conservative organisations — phase 1 and 2

It is imperative that we, the moderate cultural conservatives in Western Europe, spend the next decades to recruit, build and consolidate our forces and try to reach a common vision of a future Europe.


3.113 Assistance from our European-American/Canadian/Australian brothers in the European civil war

European-Americans should assist their brothers in Europe. The faith of multiculturalism will be decided in Europe. The war between cultural conservatives and cultural Marxists will be fought in major European cities. The doctrine of multiculturalism could have succeeded if it weren't for Islam.

3.114 Participation from conservative individuals among the minority groups — Hindus, Buddhists and Christians

Everyone will have the opportunity to show their loyalty to our cause, including nationalist European Jews, non-European Christians or Hindu /Buddhist Asians.

3.115 Defeating multiculturalism within the next 7 decades will involve the synchronised and combined efforts (unofficial) of 8 political fronts

Multiculturalism is a European hate ideology with the aim of destroying European identity, culture, traditions, moral, Christendom etc (Western civilisation).

3.116 An official request/plead to all European patriots — Required administrative high priority tasks/objectives

We hereby ask any and all European patriots to actively target all members of patriotic related Facebook groups (and non-FB networks) and invite them as friends, then send this compendium to all members of these related groups.

Essential administrative objectives:
1. Please contribute to distribute the book, 2083.
2. Send the compendium to ALL members of parliament in your country.
3. Send the compendium to all journalists in your country.
4. Send the compendium to all military and police personnel in your country.
5. Continue to develop 2083, A European Declaration of Independence.

3.117 Using Facebook and other social networking sites as a platform to consolidate and grow the European resistance movement

If you are a European patriot and you are not on Facebook you need to shape up and adapt. Get on Facebook now and start to network with fellow patriots in all European countries.

3.118 Online recruiters for patriotic armed resistance movements/8th front — primary administrative tasks

We will need leaders/initiative takers/administrators that will use the internet/Facebook and other online networks to preach and propagate armed resistance against the cultural Marxist hegemony. Seizing political and military power in your Western European country is the only way to ensure deportations of the Muslims from Europe and actual self-determination for our people.

3.119 Teach your children the truth and do not allow them to be indoctrinated by cultural Marxist/multiculturalist propaganda

Having many children is pointless, even counter-productive, if you fail to teach them the truth and allow them to be indoctrinated by cultural Marxist/multiculturalist propaganda.

3.120 Christian/nationalist consolidation and considerations in Muslim-dominated Western European prisons

Western European regimes use indirect torture as a method to torment right wing political dissidents. They do this by placing us, the nationalists and Crusaders, together with Jihadists and therefore indirectly use the Muslims as a tool for torture and/or murder of our brothers. By preventing Christian-Islamic segregation in Western European prisons, and considering the fact that they knowingly place Crusaders of Jihadists in the same cage, they are fully responsible for the atrocities committed by Muslims against any and all European conservative/resistance fighter/Crusader in prison. Many of our European brothers in the prison systems are often harassed beaten and forced to convert to Islam or suffer the consequences.


3.124 A politically incorrect guide to the lynching of multiculturalist traitors (phase 2 and 3)

One of Western Europe's biggest historical mistakes was not to punish/execute Marxists after WW2. Marxists who went into hiding during WW2 resurfaced and came back to Western European societies after the war. Most of the lynchings were aimed at the National Socialists while the Marxists for the most part were left in peace. As we all know, that generation of Marxists were going to be instrumental in development and propagation of cultural Marxist doctrine in Europe two decades later, which would later be known under the name multiculturalism. If we had executed, let's say, 100 000 Marxist intellectuals in Western Europe after WW2 and banned all form of Marxist doctrine, we could have prevented the creation of the anti-European hate ideology known as multiculturalism. It is absolutely essential that we, the cultural conservative patriots of Europe do not repeat this mistake again.

3.125 Investments and wealth protection in Europe during phase 2 and 3 — civil war, how to protect your wealth

How do you preserve wealth in times when the Four Horsemen (pestilence, war, famine and death) are on the loose? What's the point of making money if you cannot preserve it?

3.126 Building a cultural conservative paramilitary/militia organisation

Marxist logic deemed our culture and traditions not worth saving. Marxist logic, however, does not account for the power of free will. It's up to each of us to prove that our cultures and traditions are worth saving. Don't sit and wait for others to do your job and duty for you. Join the resistance today.


3.129 Recommendations for cultural conservative senior and junior military officers (phase 1, 2 and 3)

A majority of military officers throughout Europe are disgusted with the current development in regards to the Islamisation of Europe. These officers know that confrontations are unavoidable and are monitoring the situation closely. But don't expect many officers to risk their necks just yet.

3.130 The political landscape in Western Europe, 2070-2080, before the initiation of phase 3

Israel is not really comparable to any Western European country. Israel has a very small group of Muslims who are eligible to vote. In contrast, the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites of Western European countries have given most of the Muslim residents the right to vote.

The problem arises when you add the cultural Marxists/multiculturalists, the suicidal humanists, the globalist capitalists, the pacifists and the Muslim block. It is simply impossible to compete democratically with this alliance. We have lost the democratic battle of Europe.

3.131 European Civil War, Phase 3, 2070-2083

3.132 Predicted actions from other cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes

Expect a full NATO military campaign. The Western establishment will condemn the coup and use harsh rhetoric, call for boycotts etc. They may threaten to invade if France goes ahead with deportations. The Muslim populations in France are expected to entrench and refuse all deportation attempts by attempting to declare independence (enclaves). They may also call for military assistance from the Global Islamic Ummah and from Muslims in neighbouring countries. Their strategy will most likely be to entrench and refuse deportation in the hopes that NATO or the neighbouring countries will invade and overthrow the current regime.


3.137 Cultural conservative/nationalist reforms during and after phase 3

1. Prevent Islamic influence and repel all current Islamic elements in Europe
2. Initiate European cultural renaissance
3. Militarily assist cultural conservative movements in neighbouring countries
4. Assist with coups in neighbouring countries and consolidate forces

3.140 Creating a European Federation, economic, cultural and military alliance

We need to imagine a grand monocultural Europe, based on the cultural and economical cooperation of independent countries that will in a larger degree be inseparably linked to Russia. Having no need to be aggressive toward its neighbours, such a bloc would become the premier world power, self-centered, pan-nationalistic and opposed to all the dangerous dogmas now associated with globalism/multiculturalism. The new European Federation will be much more isolationist.

Muslims will eventually become overconfident in Germany, the UK and France (we are already seeing clear signs of this). Germany, France or the UK will come to their senses. Europeans will gradually understand what our elites are doing and will begin to wage a guerilla war. We will win due to the simple fact that we have nowhere to go, while our colonisers still have their homelands intact. France is likely to be the first country breaking out.

3.141 The negotiations between the European Federation and the USASSR/EUSSR block and Muslim countries in phase 3

The following approach should be followed when negotiating with Muslim nations:
1. All Sunni nations should be strongly advised to leave the Arab League and apply for the status of a tertiary protectorate of the European Federation.
2. As for the negotiations with each Muslim country; any agreement must include that they are willing to accept a fair share of expelled Muslim individuals from European Federation countries.
3. Terms offered to Muslim countries should be open for discussion and can be flexible as long as it will benefit the long term goals of the European Federation and each individual European country.

3.142 Future foreign policy — deportation and territorial claims

The new conservative order should prepare for mass deportations of all Muslims living in Europe. The first step will be the construction of huge transit zones.

Most Muslims in Eastern Europe have lived there for several centuries, so they will not accept being deported from Europe and will fight for their survival. A more brutal military strategy must therefore be applied.

Transit zones should be built close to a sea port and/or railway line (depending on which transportation method will be used for the deportation. It is essential that each area is fenced in with barb wire and armed guards.


3.146 Evacuating Christians in the Middle East in regard to the new Christian nations

There are around 12 million Christian Assyrians, Copts, Maronites and other Christian Orthodox/Catholic minorities who currently live under harsh Dhimmitude. Our objective is to offer them citizenship in the new Christian nations. Measures must be taken to evacuate these people.

As soon as Europe starts to deport Muslims; Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Saudi and the rest of the Muslim World will declare war against Israel, Armenia and all Christian minorities in the Middle East with the intention of wiping them out. It’s therefore important that all Christians in the Middle East are evacuated in the coming decades.

When the Muslim populations have been expelled from Europe, we will have rather large unpopulated areas in Albania, Western Anatolia and Lebanon with the capacity to offer a permanent home (territory) to several Christian minorities.

3.147 Quick list suggestions — future domestic and foreign policy

Obviously, these are my personal views.

Christian justification of the struggle

3.148 Pope Urban II and Pope Innocent III granted indulgence to all future crusaders (martyrs of the Church)

In 1095 during the Council of Clermont, Pope Urban II declared that he remitted all penance incurred by anyone (crusaders) who participated in the first crusade. In the 12th century, Pope Innocent III expanded the crusade indulgence to include anyone assisting with such endeavours.

3.149 The Bible and self-defence

Many Christians claim that acts of self-defence are unbiblical, unscriptural and ungodly. However, they are undoubtedly wrong.

3.150 A Book for the Knights Templar: In Praise of the New Knighthood (Liber ad milites Templi: De laude novae militae)

The following passage is taken from a treatise written between 1128 and 1146 by the Cistercian abbot Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, on behalf of the fledgling Knights Templar. It might be viewed as a combination of exhortation to the Knights, and advertisement to the population in general. Officially it is an answer to a letter written to Bernard by his friend Hugh de Payens, one of the founders of the Templars. These first sections deal directly with the Knights Templar and are of great importance to students of the early military orders.

3.151 There are no atheists in foxholes — preparing for martyrdom

European Christendom isn't just about having a personal relationship with Jesus or God. It is so much more. Christendom is identity, moral, laws and codexes which has produced the greatest civilisation the world has ever witnessed.

I'm pretty sure I will pray to God as I'm rushing through my city, guns blazing, with 100 armed system protectors pursuing me with the intention to stop and/or kill. It is likely that I will pray to God for strength at one point during that operation, as I think most people in that situation would. In times of extreme stress or fear, such as when participating in warfare or a martyrdom operation, all people will believe in or hope for a higher power.

3.152 Justiciar Knights, Martyrdom vs. Suicide

There is normally absolutely no justification or excuse to commit suicide. It is a shameful, selfish and cowardly act, similar to that of murder. But if a Justiciar Knight martyrs himself for the cause and dies, canon law guarantees an abundance of grace and entry to heaven.

Further studies

3.153 Interview with a Justiciar Knight Commander of the PCCTS, Knights Templar
(pages 1349-1413)

The interview covers politics, society and the struggle: the Western European civil war, the PCCTS, Knights Templar and other armed pan-European and national resistance movements. It also covers personal reflections and information.

3.154 Knights Templar Log


Further studies

3.155 Successful militant organisations — case studies


3.160 Fourth generation warfare

Fourth generation warfare (4GW) is combat characterised by a blurring of the lines between war and politics, soldier and civilian, peace and conflict, battlefield and safety.

3.161 The study of revolutions

This article was written by a Marxist.

Aims of the course

This course aims to enable you to:

— Know more about the variety of revolutions past and present and the different processes involved in revolutionary situations

— Understand more about the nature of revolution, its relationship to the social order, and the issues determining the outcomes of revolution

— Think concretely about revolution and counter-revolution as skilled human activities and relate your own experience to that of contemporary revolutions which have shaped Irish and European society

3.162 A short introduction to agriculture and surface mining

AR  No endorsement of the message is implied by my presentation of this material. I merely wish to serve the public need for clear information on a matter of current interest.


Home Sitemap