2083: A European Declaration of Independence
By Andrew Berwick, London, 2011
PDF, 1518 pages,
Edited by Andy Ross
The compendium documents "that the fear of Islamisation is all but
It covers the following main topics:
1. The rise of
cultural Marxism/multiculturalism in Western Europe
2. Why the Islamic
colonisation and Islamisation of Western Europe began
3. The current state
of the Western European Resistance Movements (anti-Marxist/anti-Jihad
4. Solutions for Western Europe and how we, the resistance,
should move forward in the coming decades
5. Relevant topics
including solutions and strategies for all of the 8 different political
The compendium presents advanced ideological, practical,
tactical, organisational and rhetorical solutions and strategies for all
Included are also
demographical studies, historical statistics, forecasts and insights on
various subjects related to the ongoing and future struggle of Europe. It
covers most topics related to historical events and aspects of past and
current Islamic Imperialism, which is now removed or falsified by our
academia by instruction of Western Europe's cultural relativist elites
(cultural relativism = cultural Marxism). It offers thorough analysis of
Islam, which is unknown to a majority of Europeans. It documents how the
political doctrines known as multiculturalism/cultural Marxism/cultural
relativism was created and implemented. Multiculturalists/cultural Marxists
usually operate under the disguise of humanism. A majority are
anti-nationalists and want to deconstruct European identity, traditions,
culture and even nation states.
The root of Europe's problems is the
lack of cultural self-confidence (nationalism). Most people are still
terrified of nationalistic political doctrines.
This book presents
the only solutions to our current problems. You cannot defeat Islamisation
or halt/reverse the Islamic colonization of Western Europe without first
removing the political doctrines manifested through
I have written approximately half
of the compendium myself. The rest is a compilation of works from several
courageous individuals throughout the world.
The content of the
compendium truly belongs to everyone and is free to be distributed in any
way or form.
Multiculturalism (cultural Marxism/political
correctness) is the root cause of the ongoing Islamisation of Europe which
has resulted in the ongoing Islamic colonisation of Europe through
demographic warfare (facilitated by our own leaders). This compendium
presents the solutions and explains exactly what is required of each and
every one of us in the coming decades. We have only a few decades to
consolidate a sufficient level of resistance before our major cities are
completely demographically overwhelmed by Muslims.
The introductory chapter explains how "cultural" Marxism gradually
infiltrated our post-WW2 societies.
One of conservatism's most
important insights is that all ideologies are wrong. Ideology takes an
intellectual system, a product of one or more philosophers, and says, "This
system must be true." Inevitably, reality ends up contradicting the system,
usually on a growing number of points. But the ideology, by its nature,
cannot adjust to reality; to do so would be to abandon the system.
Therefore, reality must be suppressed. If the ideology has power, it uses
its power to undertake this suppression. It forbids writing or speaking
certain facts. Its goal is to prevent not only expression of thoughts that
contradict what "must be true," but thinking such thoughts. In the end, the
result is inevitably the concentration camp, the gulag and the grave.
But what happens today to Europeans who suggest that there are
differences among ethnic groups, or that the traditional social roles of men
and women reflect their different natures, or that homosexuality is morally
wrong? If they are public figures, they must grovel in the dirt in endless,
canting apologies. If they are university students, they face star chamber
courts and possible expulsion. If they are employees of private
corporations, they may face loss of their jobs. What was their crime?
Contradicting the new ideology of Political Correctness.
Political Correctness is cultural
Marxism. The effort to translate Marxism from economics into culture goes
back at least to the writings of the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci. In
1923, in Germany, a group of Marxists founded an institute later known as
the Frankfurt School. One of its founders, Georg Lukacs, stated its purpose
as answering the question, "Who shall save us from Western Civilisation?"
The Frankfurt School blended Marx with Freud, and later influences (some
Fascist as well as Marxist) added linguistics to create critical theory and
deconstruction. These in turn influenced education theory, and through
institutions of higher education gave birth to what we now call Political
Political Correctness now looms over Western European
society like a colossus. It has taken over both political wings, left and
right. It controls the most powerful element in our culture, the media and
entertainment industry. It dominates both public and higher education. It
has even captured the higher clergy in many Christian churches. Anyone in
the establishment who departs from its dictates swiftly ceases to be a
member of the establishment.
How can Western Europeans combat
Political Correctness and retake their society from the cultural Marxists?
Those who would defeat cultural Marxism must defy it. They must use
words it forbids, and refuse to use the words it mandates. They must shout
from the housetops the realities it seeks to suppress, such as our
opposition to Sharia on a national and local level, the Islamisation of our
countries, the facts that violent crime is disproportionately committed by
Muslims and that most cases of AIDS are acquired from immoral sexual acts.
They must refuse to turn their children over to public schools. Above all,
those who would defy Political Correctness must behave according to the old
rules of our culture, not the new rules the cultural Marxists lay down.
Ladies should be wives and homemakers, not cops or soldiers, and men should
still hold doors open for ladies. Children should not be born out of
wedlock. Glorification of homosexuality should be shunned. Jurors should not
accept Islam as an excuse for murder.
Political Correctness prospers
by disguising itself. Through defiance, and through education on our own
part , we can strip away its camouflage and reveal the Marxism beneath the
Political Correctness seeks to impose a uniformity
of thought and behaviour on all Europeans and is therefore totalitarian in
nature. Its roots lie in a version of Marxism which seeks a radical
inversion of the traditional culture in order to create a social revolution.
Betty Friedan's revolution in sex roles is a manifestation of the social
revolutionary process begun by Karl Marx. The idea of transforming a
patriarchy into a matriarchy can be connected directly to Friedrich Engels'
1884 book The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. The
belief that matriarchy was the solution to patriarchy flows from Marx's
comments in The German Ideology, published in 1845. The Frankfurt School's
matriarchal theory and its near-relation, androgyny theory, both originated
from these sources.
Political Correctness is Marxism, with all that
implies: loss of freedom of expression, thought control, inversion of the
traditional social order, and ultimately a totalitarian state. If anything,
the cultural Marxism created by the Frankfurt School is more horrifying than
the old, economic Marxism that ruined Russia. At least the economic Marxists
did not exalt sexual perversion and attempt to create a matriarchy.
The origins of Political Correctness can be traced to the rise of modern
ideology and its quest for power. In contrast to the classical and
Judeo-Christian traditions, which stressed man's need to understand the
moral order and conform himself to it, modern ideologies have sought to
dominate and control the world. In the twentieth century these ideologies
gained political power in Communist states.
In the West, radical
intellectuals have sought to undermine the foundations of knowledge itself,
concentrating their efforts on the transformation of the university. The
turning point came in the 1960s, when militant students launched a guerrilla
attack on the traditions of Western culture and the liberal arts. Seeing
that they could not gain lasting power through demonstrations alone, many of
these militants opted to remain in the system, going on to become professors
themselves. This generation of cultural Marxist radicals has now become the
establishment in the majority of our institutions of higher learning.
In his seminal book The Idea of a University, Cardinal John Henry Newman
defined the "liberal arts" as a pursuit of knowledge for its own sake. By
way of contrast, he defined the "servile arts" as those modes of study that
serve only specific, immediate ends. The liberal arts are liberating, Newman
argued, because they enable men to discover the underlying principles that
guide us toward wisdom and virtue. Were he alive today, Newman would view
political correctness as servile because its purpose is to advance a
political agenda to a position of national power.
has long played a leadership role in American higher education. Stanford
eliminated its long-standing Western civilisation requirement in 1988 and
replaced it with a multicultural program known as "Cultures, Ideas, and
Values." Under this new program freshmen at Stanford can just as easily
study Marxist revolutionaries in Central America as they can Plato,
Shakespeare, or Newton. Stanford history students are not required to take a
single course in history. Instead, they are offered a choice of courses
under the heading of “American Cultures.” Stanford students must also take
courses in world cultures and gender studies. Because elite institutions
such as Stanford set an example for the rest of American and European higher
education, other universities eagerly adopt these devastating assaults on
The two pillars that have traditionally sustained the
liberal arts are academic freedom and freedom of speech. Without the freedom
to pursue the truth and to write and speak freely, authentic scholarship is
impossible. But both of these fundamental freedoms have been routinely
abrogated by the establishment of speech codes, "sensitivity" classes, and a
general atmosphere of fear and intimidation on campus.
In the long
run, the most direct method of defeating the inquisitors of political
correctness is simply to stand up to them. Every act of resistance causes a
ripple, encouraging others to stand up to ideological intimidation.
Radical Feminism and Political Correctness
was conceived and birthed in the 1830s, in the generation experiencing the
first stage of the industrial revolution. Today, the feminisation of
European culture continues to intensify. Indeed, the present-day radical
feminist assault through support for mass Muslim immigration has a political
parallel to the their anti-colonial efforts. This current assault is in part
a continuation of a century-old effort to destroy the foundation of European
The radical feminists have embraced and been embraced by the
wider and deeper movement of cultural Marxism. For dedicated Marxists, the
strategy is to attack at every point where an apparent disparity leaves a
potential constituency of "oppressed" victim groups.
The concept of
the "authoritarian personality" is a model for psychological warfare against
the European male, to render him unwilling to defend traditional beliefs and
Critical theory as applied mass psychology has led to the
deconstruction of gender in European culture. Children are not to be raised
according to their biological genders. This reflects the Frankfurt School
rationale for the disintegration of the traditional family.
Marxist movement is sweeping all before it. With its sway over the media,
fully in the grip of feminism, it is hard to discern the stirrings of a
counter-culture. The New Totalitarians are the most dangerous generation in
Western history. Not only have they managed to destroy fundamental
structures of European society, they are allowing millions of Muslims to
The fate of European civilisation depends on
European men resisting Politically Correct feminism and opposing the wider
grip of Political Correctness.
History, Marxism and Islam
(page 38 of 1518)
A lot of people believe that Christianity still
is and was as evil as Islam. This is absolutely incorrect. For century after
century, Islam was an enormous threat to what might loosely be called
Christendom. It shaped every aspect of European history and was directly
responsible for Europe's colonial empires.
governments have sanctioned deleting and ignoring large chunks of our
history, including censorships of school curricula on genocides, jihads,
torture and enslavement of Christians and other non-Muslim peoples, and the
truth about the Crusades.
Eurabian cooperation between European and
Arab specialists present a positive picture of Arab-Islamic civilisation and
contemporary Arab issues to the educated public in Europe.
1.2 European Islamic Negationism
its own brand of negationism: a movement to deny the crimes against humanity
committed by Islam. This movement is led by Islamic apologists and Marxist
academics, and followed by all the politicians, journalists and
intellectuals who call themselves secularists.
Now that Islamic
studies departments in Europe are increasingly manned by Muslims and
sponsored by Islamic foundations and states, the climate for critical
studies of Islam is only worsening.
British cooperation with the
Indian Muslims is epitomised by the founding in 1906 of the Muslim League,
which sought to "inculcate loyalty to the British Empire in the Indian
Muslims". In French West Africa, in the same period, Islam was accepted as a
factor of social stability. In the 1930s, Italian Fascists actively
supported the spread of Islam in the Horn of Africa.
The Church is
aware of the similarity between Jesus' and Mohammed's missions, so that a
criticism of the foundations of Islam may backfire on Christianity.
Christian pastors are the most fervent pleaders for the rights of Islam.
Islam has become a sister religion regularly praised as a religion of peace.
Negationism in Europe is practised with the most prowess by historians
and writers who are under the spell of Marxism. Lenin had wanted to use the
Muslims against the French and British colonialists. Modern Leftists with
Marxist sympathies see Islam as an ally against Israel and the United
1.3 The Failure of Western Universities
London's School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS)
issued a threat to a Jewish student to cease his protests against
antisemitism. Gavin Gross had been leading a campaign against deteriorating
conditions for Jewish students at SOAS, which is part of the University of
London. Its Islamic Society screened a video that compared Judaism with
Saudis and other oil-rich Arabs are busy buying influence
over what Westerners hear about Islam. Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal bin Abdul
Aziz Al-Saud, a member of the Saudi Royal Family, is known in the USA for a
$10 million check he offered to New York City Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani in
October 2001 for the Twin Towers Fund. Mayor Giuliani returned the gift when
he learned that the prince had called for the United States to "reexamine
its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance toward the
Harvard University and Georgetown University
received $20 million donations from Prince bin Talal to finance Islamic
studies. "For a university with global aspirations, it is critical that
Harvard have a strong program on Islam that is worldwide and
interdisciplinary in scope," said Steven E. Hyman, Harvard's provost.
Georgetown said it would use the gift to expand its Center for
It is difficult to understand why
American or Western authorities still allow the Saudis to fund what is being
taught about Islam to future Western leaders, years after several Saudi
nationals staged the worst terror attack in Western history. The Saudis are
enemies. It is a matter of national security.
From a report by The
American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) on US Universities:
"Throughout the humanities and social sciences, the same issues surface over
and over, regardless of discipline. ... In short, the message is that the
status quo, which is patriarchal, racist, hegemonic, and capitalist, must be
interrogated and critiqued as a means of theorising and facilitating a
social transformation whose necessity and value are taken as a given."
We may never fully reach the ideal of objective truth, but this does not
mean that we should abandon the ideal. That's what has happened during the
past decades. Western universities have moved from the Age of Reason to the
Age of Deconstruction.
1.4 Religion of Peace? Islam's war against
The Christian, Jewish, and
Zoroastrian peoples of the Middle East, North Africa, and much of Europe
suffered under the oppressive strictures of the dhimma for centuries. The
status of these dhimmi peoples is comparable in many ways to that of former
slaves in the post-bellum American South.
Due to the state of ware
between dar al-Islam and dar al-harb, systematic lying to the infidel must
be considered part and parcel of Islamic tactics.
Dhimmitude in Spain
The Iberian peninsula was conquered in
710-716 CE by Arab tribes originating from northern, central and southern
Arabia. Massive Berber and Arab immigration, and the colonisation of the
Iberian peninsula, followed the conquest. Most churches were converted into
mosques. Although the conquest had been planned and conducted jointly with a
faction of Iberian Christian dissidents, including a bishop, it proceeded as
a classical jihad with massive pillages, enslavements, deportations and
Moses Maimonides is frequently referred to as a paragon of
Jewish achievement facilitated by the enlightened rule of Andalusia. But his
own words debunk this utopian view of the Islamic treatment of Jews: "The
Arabs have persecuted us severely, and passed baneful and discriminatory
legislation against us ... Never did a nation molest, degrade, debase, and
hate us as much as they."
Following its defeat at the walls of Vienna
in 1683, Islam entered a period of strategic decline in which it was
increasingly dominated by the rising European colonial powers. Due to its
material weakness vis-ŕ-vis the West, dar al-Islam was unable to prosecute
large-scale military campaigns into infidel territory. The Islamic Empire,
then ruled by the Ottoman Turks, was reduced to fending of the increasingly
predatory European powers.
Islamic sources make clear that engaging
in violence against non-Muslims is a central and indispensable principle to
Islam. Islam is less a personal faith than a political ideology that exists
in a fundamental and permanent state of war with non-Islamic civilisations,
cultures, and individuals. The Islamic holy texts outline a social,
governmental, and economic system for all mankind. Those cultures and
individuals who do not submit to Islamic governance exist in an ipso facto
state of rebellion with Allah and must be forcibly brought into submission.
Muhammad Taqi Partovi Samzevari, in his Future of the Islamic Movement
(1986), sums up the Islamic worldview:
"A people that is not prepared
to kill and to die in order to create a just society cannot expect any
support from Allah. The Almighty has promised us that the day will come when
the whole of mankind will live united under the banner of Islam, when the
sign of the Crescent, the symbol of Muhammad, will be supreme everywhere.
... But that day must be hastened through our Jihad, through our readiness
to offer our lives and to shed the unclean blood of those who do not see the
light brought from the Heavens by Muhammad."
In geo-strategic terms, the Crusades can be viewed as an attempt by the
West to forestall its own destruction at the hands of Islamic jihad by
carrying the fight to the enemy. It worked for a while. Significantly, while
the West has for some time now lamented the Crusades as mistaken, there has
never been any mention from any serious Islamic authority of regret for the
centuries and centuries of jihad and dhimmitude perpetrated against other
societies. But this is hardly surprising: while religious violence
contradicts the fundamentals of Christianity, religious violence is written
into Islam's DNA.
Following the defeat of the Ottoman army outside
Vienna on September 11, 1683, by Polish forces, Islam went into a period of
strategic decline in which it was overwhelmingly dominated by the European
powers. Much of dar al-Islam was colonised by the European powers who
employed their superior technology and exploited the rivalries within the
Muslim world to establish colonial rule.
When one looks at the
post-colonial world, it is apparent that the most successful postcolonial
nations have a common attribute: they are not Muslim. The United States,
Australia, Hong Kong, Israel, India, and the South American nations clearly
outshine their Muslim-majority post-colonial counterparts — Iraq, Algeria,
Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, etc. — by just about any standard.
Islam – What the West needs to know
The tendency of western political
leaders to deny the connection between the orthodox Islamic mainstream and
terrorist violence is replicated in universities and the media wherever you
look both in Western Europe and North America.
Muslim advocates will
say Islam forbids suicide, but all the defenders of suicide bombings in the
Islamic world start out by saying this is not suicide. The intention of the
person is not to kill himself. The intention of the person is to kill
others. And that is sanctioned because it is Islamic Jihad. And if they in
the process are killed themselves, that's an unavoidable consequence of
their actions and they will be rewarded with the reward of martyrs in
paradise. The guarantees of paradise are for people who are killed while
they are killing to establish the hegemony of Allah or Islamic law in the
world. Jihad in Islam means struggle.
of 1095-1270 AD are not understood in the Muslim world today very
differently to the way they are understood in the Western academia and among
the Western elite class. Both talk of the Crusades as an aggressive war of
conquest by Christian Europe against peaceful innocent Muslims. One may ask
however what those Muslims were doing in the holy land in the first place.
What happened was that Muhammad and his successors laid a series of wars of
conquest and in one such onslaught in 624 AD the holy land was conquered by
On September 11th, 1683, the siege of
Vienna was broken. That was the high point of Islamic Jihad expansion into
Europe. After that, Islam went into a decline and the Islamic world was
colonised and in a drastically weakened state. It seems very likely, almost
certain as far as I’m concerned, that Osama Bin Laden chose September 11 in
2001 to signal that the decline of the Islamic world was over and that the
Jihadists were back and that they were going to pick up where they left of
in Vienna in 1683.
If we look at the tectonic
plates between the Islamic world and the non-Islamic world today, we notice
something very interesting: even very diverse Muslim societies which cannot
be easily branded under one civilisation label have something in common, and
it is the tendency that they are in conflict with their neighbours.
War is Deceit
The spokesman for Islam in the
Western world knows how to play the game. They know how to present their
cause in a way that is not only regarded as acceptable by the society
mainstream but also reasonable and just. They will appeal to democratic
institutions and their human rights in the full knowledge that given the
power to do so, they will abolish those institutions and deny those rights
Edward Said wrote that criticism of the
Islamic world on the part of Westerners was racist and imperialist. Islam is
the religion of peace. This fiction has become so entrenched in American and
European public discourse that anyone who questions it is immediately
branded as a racist, a hate monger and a bigot.
More than a
It would be incorrect to describe Islam
primarily as a religion. Since its early beginning in Muhammad's lifetime it
has also been a geopolitical project and a system of government and a
Islam from its beginnings was
both a religion and a system of government. In the Islamic calendar, year 1
is from the time that Muhammad became the leader of an army and a head of
state in Medina. This is the beginning of the Islamic calendar because in
the Islamic understanding Islam is a political and social system as well as
an individual faith.
In Islam the separation
between temporal secular and religious power is not only impossible, it is
heretical. Only in the complete blending of all aspects of human activity
and all aspects of political and legal functions of the state can we have
the Caliphate, the properly organised state that is pleasing to Allah.
Islam is not a religion for personal use. Islam is
Sharia law, Islam is a form of government to the world, and only then a
personal application. It is not just how you pray and that you pray towards
Mecca. You dress in Arab culture, you speak Arabic, you can't go to heaven
unless you pray in Arabic, you read the Quran in Arabic. It becomes an
imperialistic system. Everything is Islam.
way is Islamic Sharia, Islamic government compatible with Western
understandings of human rights and freedom of conscience. Traditional Islam
forbids conversion from Islam and forbids anyone to leave Islam. There is no
way out. It forbids Muslims and non-Muslims to live as equals in society. It
mandates the second class status (dhimmi) of non-Muslims, forbidding them to
hold authority over Muslims thus forbidding them to hold certain jobs as a
It is not possible for a non-Muslim living
in a Muslim society to invoke his civil rights and human rights that would
be independent or separate from the Sharia concept. He is expected to submit
to Sharia willingly, and if he accepts his Dhimmitude he will be a protected
person. A protected person is someone who is in fact a willing subordinate
to the Muslim overlords.
Muhammad very clearly said,
which is documented through the Hadith, that: "I have been ordered to fight
until everyone says that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is the
messenger of Allah."
Muslims who come to the United
States and come to Europe with an idea that Sharia is the law of Allah, they
look upon our freedom of religion and they look upon the fact that
non-Muslims are in power making laws that are not on the basis of the law of
Allah but on the basis of consensus and free elections. They look upon all
that as a manifestation of Jahelia or unbelief, the pre-Islamic period of
ignorance, as the time in any nation's history before it became Muslim. Many
Muslims coming into the United States and Western Europe will work to
establish Islamic mechanisms of government here where the goal is to create
Islamic states on the basis of the idea that secular states and the state
based on elections has no legitimacy. You don’t have elections about the law
of Allah, you simply obey what God says.
The House of War
Islam is a religion and a belief system that mandates
warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal
model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society.
Islamic fundamentalism in the West has a façade that Islam is a
peaceful religion. Because they are waiting to have more Islamic immigrants,
they are waiting to increase in number, waiting to increase their political
power. Once they do, then history will repeat itself. You will see the real
face of Islamic fundamentalism here in your country.
Islamic law does not allow for treaties. It does not allow for negotiated
settlements between Muslim states and non-Muslim states. All it allows for
is a temporary period of up to 10 years of hudna or what is commonly
translated as truce. In a war that the Jihadists consider has gone on for 14
centuries and are willing to fight for 14 more.
Islamic thinking the world is divided into the House of Islam, where Islamic
law has been established, where Allah rules supreme, and the House of War,
which is the rest of the world. It is possible to have peaceful
co-existence, but that peaceful co-existence is a tactical ploy and not a
This is not a conflict that was
created with the creation of the state of Israel or a conflict that was
created when the American army went into Iraq. The global Jihad has been
going on without any significant interruption since the 7th century. And it
only declined in force and activity at periods when the Islamic world was
too weak to prosecute it.
Do we want to preserve our
Judeao-Christian values and our own civilisation or do we want, do we choose
to go towards a dhimmitude, an enlarged dhimmitude in Europe, which will
engulf the whole of Europe?
Defending the West in
the name of the ideology of multiculturalism would be impossible.
Multiculturalism and post-modern liberalism are not worthy dying for.
1.8 European Slaves, Arab Masters
By Andrew G. Bostom
public protest in Washington, DC, April 5, 2005 highlighted the current
(ongoing, for centuries) plight of black Mauritanians enslaved by Arab
masters. The final two decades of the 20th century, moreover, witnessed a
frank jihad genocide, including mass enslavement, perpetrated by the Arab
Muslim Khartoum government against black Christians and animists in the
The linkage between jihad and enslavement provides an
explanation for the unparalleled scale and persistence of slavery in Muslim
dominions, and societies. This general observation applies as well to
'specialised' forms of slavery, including the (procurement and) employment
of eunuchs, slave soldiering (especially of adolescents), other forms of
child slavery, and harem slavery. Jihad slavery, in its myriad
manifestations, became a powerful instrument for both expansive
Islamisation, and the maintenance of Muslim societies.
idolatrous Hindus, enslaved in vast numbers during the waves of jihad
conquests that ravaged the Indian subcontinent for well over a half
millennium (beginning at the outset of the 8th century CE), the guiding
principles of Islamic law regarding their fate were unequivocally coercive.
Jihad slavery also contributed substantively to the growth of the Muslim
population in India.
Islamic slavery in Africa was comparable in
scale and scope to the Western transatlantic slave trade to the Americas.
Slavery was openly practiced in both Ottoman Turkey, and Shi'ite (Qajar)
Iran, through the first decade of the 20th century. Slavery on the Arabian
peninsula was not abolished formally until 1962 in Saudi Arabia.
1.9 Hindu Kush, the largest genocides in the history of man
Authorities agree that the Hindu Kush region is a place of Hindu
genocide. The name 'Hindu Kush' of the mountain range in Eastern Afghanistan
means 'Hindu Slaughter' or 'Hindu Killer'. Until 1000 CE the area of Hindu
Kush was a full part of Hindu cradle. It seems likely that the range was
deliberately named Hindu Kush by the Moslem conquerors, as a lesson to the
future generations of Indians.
Afghanistan is now a Moslem country.
Logically, this means one or more of the following must have happened: (a)
the original residents of Hindu Kush converted to Islam, or (b) they were
slaughtered and the conquerors took over, or (c) they were driven out.
The Indian Government has never demanded that the Afghan Government
change such an insulting and barbaric name. But in July 1993 the government
of India asked the visiting Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra to change its name
because the word Jerusalem in its name is offensive to Moslem
Although the Hindu Kush has been referred to as
Hindu slaughter, it is obvious that it was really a Hindu and Buddhist
slaughter. As the huge stone Buddhas of Bamian show, Buddhists were idol
worshipers par excellence. Hence for Moslem invaders the Buddhists idol
worshipers were equally deserving of punishment. The true depth of the Hindu
genocide remains unknown.
1.10 Additional info — Hindu Kush
The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a
pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the
populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign,
and similar numbers deported as slaves.
But the Indian pagans were
far too numerous and never fully surrendered. What some call the Muslim
period in Indian history was in reality a continuous war of occupiers
against resisters, in which the Muslim rulers were finally defeated in the
In 1857, the near-defunct Muslim dynasties (Moghuls,
Nawabs) tried to curry favour with their Hindu subjects and neighbours, in
order to launch a joint effort to re-establish their rule. This is the only
instance in modern history when Muslims offered concessions to the Hindus.
After that, all the concessions made for the sake of communal harmony were a
one-way traffic from Hindu to Muslim.
1.11 What the Crusades
The Crusaders were not unprovoked aggressors, greedy
marauders, or medieval colonialists, as portrayed in some history books. In
fact, the Crusades were defensive wars, not wars of conquest.
the time of Mohammed, Muslims had sought to conquer the Christian world.
After a few centuries of steady conquests, Muslim armies had taken all of
North Africa, the Middle East, Asia Minor and most of Spain. As far as
unprovoked aggression goes, it was all on the Muslim side. At some point
what was left of the Christian world had to defend itself or simply succumb
to Islamic conquest.
1.12 The Crusades and today
Present-day tension between the West and Muslim countries has very little to
do with the Crusades, says a historian. Thomas Madden, chair of the history
department at St. Louis University and author of A Concise History of the
Crusades, contends that, from the Muslim perspective, the Crusades were not
worth noticing. That changed when 19th-century revisionists started to
recast the Crusades as imperialist wars, he says.
factors that led to the Crusades
By Lúcio Mascarenhas
Islam began as
an overtly militant and aggressive cult in its fundamental and inherent
nature, and remains so. The Crusades were subsequent to the Islamic
aggressions and responses to them. The immediate provocation for the first
crusade was the Islamic mistreatment of Christian pilgrims to Israel and
attempts to deny Christians access to these sites.
Aftermath of the Crusades
By Robert Spencer
The capture of
Jerusalem is often portrayed as the cause of Muslim mistrust of the West.
The Crusaders' sack of Jerusalem was a heinous crime, but by the military
standards of the day, it was nothing out of the ordinary. Muslim armies
frequently behaved in exactly the same way when entering a conquered city.
1.15 History of the Islamic Ottoman Turkish Empire
Treaty of Lausanne in 1923, an estimated 200 000 Greeks remained in Turkey
following a population exchange. The Armenians were reduced from 2.5 million
to around 150 000 after the genocide.
After 1945, in light of the
Soviet domination over Eastern Europe, the United States supports Greece and
Turkey with economic and military aid to prevent their falling into the
Cyprus was declared an independent state in 1960 with
Archbishop Makarios as President and a constitution with equal Turkish
governance. Turkish Cypriots saw themselves as Turks living in Cyprus rather
than Turkish Cypriots. The Zurich and London agreements granted the Turkish
Cypriot community political rights disproportionate their numbers. A 1960
census in Cyprus showed that Greek Cypriots comprised 77% and Turkish
In 1987, Turkey submitted its application for
formal membership into the European Community. It was refused, citing
Turkey's economic and political situation, poor relations with Greece and
the conflict with Cyprus.
Turkey restricts religious rights of
Christians and converts. Their murder is indirectly encouraged. Millions of
Kurds, Assyrians, Alevies, Yezidies and other minorities have no status.
Women in Turkey are often subjected to "honour" killings and employment
discrimination. Turkey occupies 37% of Cyprus and refuses to recognise the
Republic of Cyprus.
1.16 Institutionalised rape of Christians
under the Ottoman Empire
The historical acceptance of rape may have
influenced the incidence of rape in the wars of the last decade in former
Yugoslavia. The use or misuse of Serb and other Christian minority women by
Muslim men has been a major source of grievance. Polygamy and concubinage by
Muslim men resulted in wives and concubines being taken from the Christian
population as well as the Muslim one. The janissary in charge of an estate
or the local landlord had the right to the virginity of all brides among
Serb and other serfs.
1.17 Jihadi Genocides of Christians in the
Ottoman Empire and Turkey
Armenian Genocide (1915-1918)
— Over 1 500 000
The genocide of the Armenians was a jihad. Despite the
disapproval of many Muslim Turks and Arabs, and their refusal to collaborate
in the crime, these massacres were perpetrated solely by Muslims and they
alone profited from the booty.
Those involved in the mass murder
showed little interest in stopping to dig graves. The roadside corpses and
emaciated deportees were a shocking sight to foreigners working in Turkey.
Eyewitnesses included German government liaisons, American missionaries, and
U.S. diplomats stationed in the country. The U.S. ambassador to Turkey,
Henry Morgenthau, reported to Washington: "When the Turkish authorities gave
the orders for these deportations, they were merely giving the death warrant
to a whole race."
When World War I ended, representatives from the
fledgling Republic of Armenia attended the Paris Peace Conference in the
hope that the victorious Allies would give them back their historic lands
seized by Turkey. The European Allies asked the United States to assume
guardianship of the new Republic. The Treaty of Sevres was signed in 1920 by
the Allied Powers, the Republic of Armenia, and the new moderate leaders of
Turkey. The treaty recognised an independent Armenian state.
nationalism once again reared its head. The new nationalist leader, Mustafa
Kemal, refused to accept the treaty, re-occupied the lands in question, and
expelled any surviving Armenians.
No Allied power came to the aid of
the Armenian republic and it collapsed. After the obliteration of the people
of historic Armenia during the Armenian genocide, the Turks demolished any
remnants of their cultural heritage. Even today, the United States, Great
Britain, Turkey and the rest of the Muslim World have refused to recognise
the Armenian Genocide.
Greek Jihadi Genocide (1914-23)
the years 1914-1923, the indigenous Greek minority of the Ottoman Empire was
subjected to a centrally organised, premeditated and systematic policy of
annihilation. A lethal combination of internal deportations involving death
marches, forced conversions to Islam, torture, mutilation, rape, enslavement
and massacres conducted throughout Ottoman Turkey resulted in the death of
one million Ottoman Greeks. The present estimate is that some 1 400 000
Greeks of all ages were killed during that period. The Turkish
functionaries, with German approval, declared that no Christian should be
left alive in Turkey unless he consented to embrace Mohammedanism.
Assyrian Jihadi Genocide (1914-1920)
Genocide was committed against
the Assyrian and Syriac Christians of the Ottoman Empire near the end of the
First World War by the leadership of the Young Turks party. Scholars have
placed the number of Assyrian victims at 500 000 to 750 000.
Turkey: Back to the Future?
By Andrew G. Bostom
Turks are seeking
to join the European Union (EU). Recently, security analyst Frank Gaffney
wrote an essay urging that Turkey's bid to join the EU be rejected.
The essay elaborates on Jihad and dhimmitude under the Ottomans; the failure
of the Ottoman Tanzimat reforms to abrogate the system of dhimmitude; and
the dissolution of this Sharia state whose collapse during the first World
War included a jihad genocide of an Ottoman dhimmi population, the
An influential member of the Ottoman Committee of Union
and Progress, Sheik Abd-ul-Hack, a progressive Young Turk, made this
revealing declaration writing in a Parisian Muslim review in August, 1912:
"The Musulman religion is in open hostility to all your world of
progress. Understand, you European observers, that a Christian, whatever his
position may be, by the mere fact of his being a Christian is regarded by us
as a blind man lost to all sense of human dignity. Our reasoning with regard
to him is as simple as it is definitive. We say: the man whose judgment is
so perverted as to deny the existence of a one and only God, and to make up
gods of different sorts, can only be the meanest expression of human
degradation; to speak to him would be a humiliation for our intelligence and
an insult to the grandeur of the Master of the Universe. The presence of
such miscreants among us is the bane of our existence; their doctrine is a
direct insult to the purity of our faith; contact with them is a defilement
of our bodies; any relation with them a torture to our souls."
Enforced abrogation of the laws of dhimmitude required the dismantling of
the Ottoman Empire. This finally occurred after the Balkan wars of
independence, and during the European Mandate period following World War I.
The present Prime Minister Erdogan's efforts to re-Islamise Turkey are
consistent with a return to Turkey's Ottoman past as the heartland of an
empire established by jihad and governed by sharia.
1.19 The fall
of the Christian state of Lebanon
Lebanese Christians, who constitute
the only influential Christian community in the Middle East, are fast
declining in numbers and power, in favour of the Muslim majority.
Advent of Islam and Christians of the East
By Dr. George Khoury, Catholic
Information Network (CIN)
During his lifetime, Muhammad reacted
differently at different times to Jews and Christians depending on the
reception they accorded him and also on his dealings with Christian states.
During the period of two hundred years following Muhammad's death, the
attitude of Islam to Christianity remained generally similar to what it had
been during the closing years of the prophet's life. Christianity was
regarded as parallel to Islam, but corrupt. To this extent, Islam was
1.20 Battle of Poitiers (Battle of Tours) — First
Islamic wave — Year 732
The Battle of Tours (October 10, 732) pitted
Frankish and Burgundian forces under Charles Martel against an army of the
Umayyad Caliphate. The Franks were victorious and Charles subsequently
extended his authority in the south. Ninth-century chroniclers gave Charles
the nickname Martellus - the Hammer.
Historians began to characterise
this battle as being the decisive turning point in the struggle against
Islam, a struggle which preserved Christianity as the religion of Europe.
It appears as if the Umayyads were not aware of the true strength of the
Franks. The Umayyad forces were not particularly concerned about any of the
Germanic tribes, including the Franks. Arab awareness of the Franks as a
growing military power only came after the Battle of Tours.
disparity between the armies, in that the Franks were mostly infantry,
against Berber cavalry and armoured or mailed Arab horsemen, Charles Martel
fought a brilliant defensive battle. In a place and time of his choosing, he
met a far superior force, and defeated it.
The battle of Tours is one
of the decisive battles of the world. It decided that Christians, and not
Moslems, should be the ruling power in Europe. Charles Martel's victory over
the Arabs stemmed the tide of their westward advance. He went on to clear
southern France from Islamic attackers for decades.
of Vienna — Second Islamic wave — Year 1683
The Battle of Vienna took
place on 11-12 September, 1683 after Vienna had been besieged by the Ottoman
Empire for two months. The battle broke the advance of the Ottoman Empire
into Europe and marked the political hegemony of the Habsburg dynasty in
The Turks lost at least 15 000 men dead and wounded
in the fighting, plus at least 5 000 men captured and all cannons, compared
to approximately 4 500 dead and wounded for the Habsburg-Polish forces.
Austria signed a peace treaty with the Ottoman Empire in 1697. The
Ottomans fought on for another 16 years, losing control of Hungary and
Transylvania in the process, before finally giving up. The end of the
conflict was finalised by the Treaty of Karlowitz.
By Baron Bodissey
At the Battle of Poitiers in 732,
the Frankish king Charles Martel defeated the Saracens and pushed the forces
of Islam back into the Iberian Peninsula. It was not until 1492 that the
Moors were finally thrown out of Europe, but in the meantime the Islamic
virus was contained in Spain and Portugal, and thus kept out of the heart of
One of Charles Martel's comrades-in-arms at Poitiers
was a warrior of the North known as Holger the Dane. At the end of his days,
Holger retired to a secluded keep to enter a twilight sleep from which he
will awake in the hour of his country’s need. The location most frequently
cited for Holger's rest is Kronborg castle at Helsingřr (Elsinore).
1.23 Western vs. Islamic science and religion
talks about Buddhist science or Christian science, so I so no reason why we
should use the term "Islamic science" either. The term "Arab science" is
By the end of the eleventh century, Western Europeans
were aware that both Muslims and Byzantines had access to philosophical and
scientific texts that they did not have. After the capture of Toledo, Spain
and Sicily from the Muslims in 1085 and 1091, respectively, a number of
scholars translated Greek and Arabic texts. The result was a lot of
translations in the twelfth and thirteenth century.
Many works in
optics, astronomy, medicine and mathematics were translated, but it was
Aristotle's work on natural philosophy that had the greatest impact.
Greek logic and natural philosophy were never fully accepted in the Islamic
world, and what initial acceptance there had been was largely nullified by
the extremely influential Muslim theologian al-Ghazali (1058-1111 C.E.).
Al-Ghazali regarded theology and natural philosophy as dangerous to the
Islamic faith and was skeptical of the concept of mathematical proof.
French thinker Remi Brague claims that Muslims largely lacked the
European instinct for self-criticism and appreciation of others. They did
translate works from Greek and other languages like Sanskrit and Persian,
but they usually didn't preserve the originals. This made going back to the
sources to reinterpret them impossible in the Islamic world.
continued to be used as an ancillary subject in scholastic theology (kalam)
and in many Islamic religious schools, but there was enough hostility toward
philosophy to prompt philosophers to keep a low profile.
situation was radically different in the Latin West. There was sporadic
opposition to the use of reason and one attempt to ban the works of
Aristotle at the University of Paris in the thirteenth century, but this was
of brief duration and eventually failed. There were no later attempts to ban
the use of logic and natural philosophy.
Islam is in principle a
theocracy in which religion and state form a single entity. Islamic schools,
or madrasas, generally taught "Islamic science," that is theology, Arabic
grammar, the Koran and the hadith etc. Greek and other non-Muslim philosophy
was called "foreign sciences" and was never integrated into the core
The European university system had no real equivalent in
any other major civilisation in the world at the time. Nothing like it
existed in the Islamic world. Universities could only be established in
Spain and Portugal after these countries had been re-conquered by the
At the beginning of the 21st century, Western
universities seem to be increasingly preoccupied with deconstructing their
own civilisation and praising the most barbaric cultures and regimes on
earth. There has been a decline in free inquiry and good scholarship.
1.24 Historically — Bosnia is Serbian Land
settled in the Balkans in the 7th century. The two largest tribes were Serbs
and Croats. To this day the two people speak one and the same language.
Until recently the language was known as Serbo-Croatian. The only outwardly
difference between Serbs and Croats today is that the former are Orthodox
while the later are Catholic Christians.
1.25 Who are the
The natives of Bosnia and Herzegovina are officially
described as Bosniaks, but classify themselves according to religion. All
alike belong to the Serbo-Croatian branch of the Slavonic race, and all
speak a language almost identical to Serbian, though written by the Roman
Catholics in Latin instead of Cyrillic letters.
religion is not a religion in the Christian sense of involving principally
the problems of morality, spiritual growth, and immortality. Mohammedanism
is a state of society founded on a collection of laws and legal principles
dealing with and ruling every event of individual and public life.
Where Islam is master, no other civil status is recognised except in
tolerance and in subordination to Islam. There can be no assimilation with
people of other creeds or civilisation.
As the central rule in the
Ottoman Empire was dying out, Janissaries governed Bosnia. They were
oppressive and cruel. When Great Britain insisted that Turkish sultan should
give equal rights to his Christian subjects, the Janissaries of Bosnia
started a rebellion to topple the sultan.
1.26 Historical Islamic
demographic warfare in Kosovo
By M. Bozinovich
Kosovo has an Albanian majority, hence it should be
either given to Albania or granted international recognition as an
1.27 Origin or the myth of a tolerant
pluralistic Islamic society
By Bat Ye'or
In my 1991 book, I tried to
analyze the numerous processes that had transformed rich, powerful Christian
civilisations into Islamic lands and their long-term effects, which had
reduced native Christian majorities into scattered small religious
minorities, now slowly disappearing.
This complex Islamisation
process of Christian lands and civilisations on both shores of the
Mediterranean, and in Iraq and Armenia, I have called the process of
dhimmitude and the civilisation of those peoples who underwent such
transformation, I have named the civilisation of dhimmitude. The indigenous
native peoples were Jews and Christians: Orthodox, Catholics, or from other
Eastern Christian Churches. They are all referred to by Muslim jurists as
the Peoples of the Book and are called dhimmis: protected peoples, because
Islamic law protects their life and goods on condition that they submit to
The civilisation of dhimmitude does not develop all at
once. It is a long process that involves many elements and a specific
conditioning. It happens when peoples replace history by myths, when they
fight to uphold these destructive myths more then their own values because
they are confused by having transformed lies into truth. They hold to those
myths as if they were the only guarantee of their survival, when, in fact,
they are the path to destruction.
1.28 Palestine for the Syrians?
There is no such thing as a Palestinian people. Before 1948, they were
referred to as Syrians. Creating a separate Palestinian state is as
ridiculous as creating a separate state called Kosovo.
Historical acts of high treason by European governments
act in accordance with their own short term goals alone show no
consideration for historical perspectives. Where there should be a joint
anti-Jihad action by the affected nations there is just short term
1.30 Further studies
There are a great number
of books in print relating to the Templars, past Crusades, and medieval
(page 280 of 1518)
2.1 EU's Eurabia Project
Eurabia: Arab League states, current and prospective European Union
members and Israel.
What follows is a brief outline of
the thesis put forward by writer Bat Ye'or in her book Eurabia: The
Bat Ye'or: "European leaders have decided on an
alliance with the Arab world, through which they have committed to accept
the Arab and Muslim approach toward the United States and Israel. This is
not only with respect to foreign policy, but also on issues engaging
European society from within, such as immigration, the integration of the
immigrants and the idea that Islam is part of Europe."
project facilitated European ambitions to maintain spheres of influence in
the former European colonies, while opening huge markets for European
products in the Arab world, especially in oil-producing countries, in order
to secure supplies of petroleum and natural gas to Europe.
states demanded from Europe access to Western science and technology,
European political independence from the United States, European pressure on
the United States to align with their Arab policy and demonisation of Israel
as a threat to world peace, as well as measures favorable to Arab
immigration and dissemination of Islamic culture in Europe.
Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation was created in Paris in
1974 and now has over six hundred members from all major European political
Euro-Arab Dialogue (EAD) symposia conducted in Venice (1977)
and Hamburg (1983) included recommendations that were accompanied by a
deliberate, privileged influx of Arab and other Muslim immigrants into
Europe in enormous numbers.
A complete rewriting of history was
ratified by the parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe in September
1991, at its meeting devoted to "The Contribution of the Islamic
Civilisation to European culture." A Foundation on the Dialogue of Cultures
and Civilisations was to control everything said, written and taught about
Islam in Europe.
Over the past three decades, EEC and the EU
political and cultural organisations have invented a fantasy Islamic
civilisation and history. The historical record of violations of basic human
rights for all non-Muslims and women under sharia is either ignored or
The new European civilisation in the making can be termed
a ''civilisation of dhimmitude.'' Dhimmitude is the status of subjugated,
non-Muslim individuals who accept restrictive and humiliating subordination
to Islamic power in order to avoid enslavement or death. The entire Muslim
world as we know it today is a product of this 1,300 year-old jihad dynamic,
whereby once thriving non-Muslim majority civilisations have been reduced to
a state of dysfunction and dhimmitude. Dhimmis are inferior beings who
endure humiliation and aggression in silence. Muslims enjoy impunity under
Eurabia possesses political, economic, religious, cultural,
and media components, which are imposed on Europe by powerful governmental
lobbies. Dissidents are silenced or boycotted. Sometimes they are fired from
their jobs, victims of a totalitarian "correctness" imposed mainly by the
academic, media and political sectors.
Are Bat Ye'or's claims
correct, or even possible?
Richard North and Christopher Booker call
the European Union "a slow-motion coup d'état: the most spectacular coup
d'état in history," designed to gradually and carefully sideline the
democratic process and subdue the older nation states of Europe without
saying so publicly.
Eurabia is now French domestic policy. France
will burn unless she continues to appease Arabs and agree to their agenda.
The growth of the Islamic population is explosive. According to some, one
out of three babies born in France is a Muslim. Hundreds of Muslim ghettos
already de facto follow sharia, not French law. Some believe France will
quietly become a Muslim country, while others are predicting a civil war in
the near future.
MEDEA (the European Institute for Research on
Mediterranean and Euro-Arab Cooperation), supported by the European
Commission, is one of the key components of the Euro-Arab dialogue. On its
own webpage, it states that:
"The Euro-Arab Dialogue as a forum shared by
the European Community and the League of Arab States arose out of a French
initiative and was launched at the European Council in Copenhagen in
In December 2003, Javier Solana, the Secretary
General of the Council of the European Union, Romano Prodi, President of the
European Commission and Chris Patten, member of the European Commission,
signed a plan for "Strengthening the EU's Partnership with the Arab World."
This includes the creation of a free trade area, but also plans to
"invigorate cultural/religious/civilisation and media dialogue using
existing or planned instruments, including the planned Euro-Mediterranean
Foundation for the Dialogue of Cultures and Civilisations."
Trifkovic: "The present technological, cultural and financial strength of
Europe is a façade that conceals a deep underlying moral and demographic
weakness. The symptoms of the malaise are apparent in the unprecedented
demographic collapse and in the loss of a sense of place and history that go
hand-in-hand with the expansion of the European Union. The emerging
transnational hyper-state is actively indoctrinating its subject-population
into believing and accepting that the demographic shift in favor of Muslim
aliens is actually a blessing."
The Muslim Brotherhood was founded by
Hassan al-Banna in 1928. Banna: "We want the flag of Islam to fly over those
lands again who were lucky enough to be ruled by Islam for a time, and hear
the call of the muezzin praise God. Then the light of Islam died out and
they returned to disbelief. Andalusia, Sicily, the Balkans, Southern Italy
and the Greek islands are all Islamic colonies which have to return to
Islam's embrace. The Mediterranean and the Red Sea have to become internal
seas of Islam, as they used to be."
A document called "The Project"
was a 14-page plan written in Arabic and dated December 1, 1982, which
outlined a 12-point strategy to "establish an Islamic government on earth".
The Project has served for more than two decades as the Muslim Brotherhood
"master plan." Some of it recommendations include:
— Using deception to
mask the intended goals of Islamist actions — Building extensive social
networks of schools, hospitals and charitable organisations — Involving
ideologically committed Muslims in institutions on all levels in the West —
Instrumentally using existing Western institutions until they can be put
into service of Islam — Instituting alliances with Western "progressive"
organisations that share similar goals
The current leader of the
international Muslim Brotherhood, Mohammad Mahdi Akef, recently issued a new
strategy calling on all its member organisations to serve its global agenda
of defeating the West. Akef: "I have complete faith that Islam will invade
Europe and America."
Islamic groups in the West are buying large
amounts of real estate, territory that effectively becomes "Muslim" land
once it is in the hands of Islamist groups. Some groups are signing
agreements to guarantee that they will only sell the land to other Muslims.
The Brotherhood is active in investments in properties and businesses across
The tentacles of the vast, inflated EU bureaucracy insinuate
themselves into regulations on every conceivable subject. Some of the
examples of the bureaucracy are ridiculous, some are sinister:
Promotion of an official, "EU federal ideology" advocating multiculturalism
— Denunciation as "xenophobes" all those who want to preserve national
democracy — Calling those who would limit Third World immigration "racists"
Early in 2006, the EU human rights commissioner Alvaro Gil-Robles
said: "Religion as a school subject should be a general course that attempts
to give students insight into the three monotheistic religions," namely
Christianity, Judaism and Islam.
There are several possible ways of
dealing with education about religion:
— Teach the traditional religions
in Europe, namely Christianity and Judaism — Teach all the major world
religions — Leave religion out of the curriculum
The European Union
treats Islam as a European religion on par with Christianity and Judaism.
This is a crucial component of Eurabian thinking and practice. EU
authorities didn't ask for more teaching of Buddhism or Hinduism. Only Islam
is being pushed.
People who have grown up in former Communist
countries say that they see this same totalitarian impulse at work in
Western Europe now. According to them, we in the West are at least as
brainwashed by multiculturalism and Political Correctness as they ever were
The EU federalists and Eurabians have taken a page
out of the Islamic playbook, and have been approaching their goals by
stealth for decades, buried beneath a mass of detail and technocratic
newspeak all but incomprehensible to non-bureaucrats.
Union has been compared to the Roman Empire, but such comparisons are inept.
Rome was the military superpower of its time, while the EU is a military
The EU is an organisation where unelected bureaucrats
dismantle democracy, yet denounce their critics as anti-democratic forces.
In order to create this new entity, the old nation states must be
deliberately crushed. Massive numbers of non-European immigrants are
introduced, and the resulting situation is termed a "multicultural society".
The nation state itself has been declared evil or obsolete. If a small
group of people sideline the democratic process in one country and start
imposing their own laws on the public, it's called a coup d'état. If they do
so on an entire continent, it's called the European Union.
2.2 The Eurabia Code – 2008 updates
European leaders are increasingly open about the idea of
enlarging the EU to include the Arab world. They do not present this as
surrendering the continent to Islam. We are sheep and constitute no threat
while they must continue appeasing the Muslims.
governments, giving in to pressure from Arab terrorists and oil-producing
states, abandoned their traditional pro-Israeli position and gradually
aligned themselves with the Arab-Islamic world. European governments have
agreed to pay Arabs, large sums in "protection money" to reduce the
terrorist threat. This can only be seen as jizya, and the practice has later
spread to the entire European Union.
The European Union has accepted
that the union should be enlarged to include the Muslim Middle East and
North Africa. The EU has accepted that tens of millions of immigrants from
predominantly Muslim countries in northern Africa should be allowed to
settle in Europe in the years ahead. This is supposedly "good for the
economy." It is planning to implement sharia laws for the millions of
Muslims it is inviting to settle in Europe. It has passed stronger
anti-racism laws while making it clear that "Islamophobia" constitutes a
form of racism, and is cooperating with Islamic countries on rewriting
school textbooks to provide a "positive" image of Islam to European
The European Union is formally surrendering an entire
continent to Islam while destroying established national cultures, and is
prepared to harass those who disagree with this policy. This constitutes the
greatest organised betrayal in Western history.
The European Union —
or the Eurabian Empire if you will — is a naked power grab by the elites in
order to dismantle the nations there are supposed to serve.
should work to get rid of the culture of betrayal. We also need to get rid
of the culture of appeasement. No money for the Palestinians. If they need
money, they can ask the Saudis.
reasons to get rid of the European Union
1. The EU promotes
crime and instability
2. The EU weakens Europe’s cultural defences
3. The EU promotes a bloated bureaucracy
4. Excessive regulation and
centralization is bad for freedom and prosperity
5. The lack of a real
separation of powers in the EU invites abuse of power
6. The lack of
transparency leaves the EU vulnerable to hostile infiltration
7. The EU
leads to less freedom of speech
8. The EU fails to consult its citizens
and insults them when doing so
9. The EU undermines political legitimacy
and connections between rulers and the ruled
10. The EU spreads a
culture of lies and corruption
2.4 Why the EU needs to be
destroyed, and soon
Many Americans, and
Europeans, too, have more or less written off Western Europe as lost to
Islam already. I see encouraging signs of a real shift of public opinion
beneath the surface. Judging from information such as the extremely high
number of Germans hostile to Islam, I still hope that Europe can be saved.
But this hope hinges on the destruction of the European Union.
Scruton: "We in Europe stand at a turning point in our history. Our
parliaments and legal systems still have territorial sovereignty. They still
correspond to historical patterns of settlement that have enabled the
French, the Germans, the Spaniards, the British and the Italians to say 'we'
and to know whom they mean by it. The opportunity remains to recuperate the
legislative powers and the executive procedures that formed the nation
states of Europe. At the same time, the process has been set in motion that
would expropriate the remaining sovereignty of our parliaments and courts,
that would annihilate the boundaries between our jurisdictions, that would
dissolve the nationalities of Europe in a historically meaningless
collectivity, united neither by language, nor by religion, nor by customs,
nor by inherited sovereignty and law."
Europe has got itself into a
bad fix, again, and will have some turbulent and painful years and decades
The creation of Eurabia is the greatest act of treason in the
history of Western civilisation for two thousand years. The EU elites want
to recreate the Roman Empire on both sides of the Mediterranean. Instead,
they are creating a civilisational breakdown across much of Western Europe
as the barbarians are overrunning the continent. Eurabia can only be
derailed by destroying the European Union.
the United Nations!
The United Nation
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon condemned Wilder's movie Fitna as "offensively
anti-Islamic," and said "There is no justification for hate speech or
incitement to violence." Does that mean that the UN is now going to ban the
Koran, which does both?
Earlier, the U.N. Human Rights Council passed
a resolution saying it is deeply concerned about the defamation of religions
and urging governments to prohibit it. The only religion specified is Islam.
The document was put forward by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference,
the largest voting bloc at the UN, sponsored by Saudi money.
includes free speech. Muslims are trying to use the UN to limit free speech
across the world.
The best way to deal with the Islamic world is to
have as little to do with it as possible. We should ban Muslim immigration,
remove all Muslim non-citizens currently in the West, and change our laws to
ensure that Muslim citizens who advocate sharia or preach Jihad or the
inequality of "infidels" and of women should have their citizenship revoked
and be deported back to their country of origin.
We need to create an
environment where the practice of Islam is made difficult. Muslim citizens
should be forced to either accept our secular ways or leave if they desire
sharia. Much of this can be done in a non-discriminatory way, by simply
refusing to allow special pleading to Muslims.
For Europe, the most
important thing to do right now is to dismantle the European Union in its
present form, and regain national control over our borders and our
legislation. The EU is so deeply flawed as an organisation, and so heavily
infiltrated by Eurabian and pro-Islamic thinking that it simply cannot be
reformed. And let’s end the stupid support for the Palestinians that the
Eurabians have encouraged, and start supporting our cultural cousin, Israel.
We should implement a policy of containment of the Islamic world. We
should restrain their ability to hurt us physically. We can’t prevent it
completely, but we should limit it as much as possible. Muslims try to wear
us down through terrorism. They should be worn down through mockery and
Islam is an all-or-nothing religion which cannot be
secularised. Islam may not be able to achieve the world dominance it
desires, but it may be able to start a world war. We can only try to prevent
this from happening.
We should fight for the right to preserve our
own culture and pass it on to future generations. Upholding national borders
has become more important in the age of globalisation, terrorism and mass
migration, not less. Nobody has so far made any convincing model of a
We now have a political class who spend much
of their time travelling around the world. They no longer feel as attached
to the people they are supposed to represent as they did in the past. This
is perhaps inevitable, but it feeds a growing sense of detachment between
ordinary people and their supposed leaders.
The West is declining as
a percentage of world population. We have no obligation to "save" the
Islamic world, and do not have the financial strength nor the demographic
numbers to do so even if we wanted to. We are not in a position to help all
of the Third World out of poverty, certainly not by allowing all of them to
The West is becoming so overwhelmed by immigration that
this may trigger civil wars in several Western nations in the near future.
We already have massive Third World ghettos in our major cities. We should
make our countries Islam-unfriendly and implement a policy of containment of
Dar al-Islam. This is the most civilised thing we can do in order to save
ourselves, but also to limit the loss of life among both Muslims and
Authorities or groups of dedicated individuals should
engage in efforts to explain the real nature of Islam, emphasising the
division that Islam teaches between Believer and Infidel, the permanent
state of war between Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb, and the use of religious
deception. We should explain why Islam encourages despotism, economic
paralysis, and intellectual failure in Islamic countries. Let Muslims
understand that their political, economic, social, intellectual, and moral
failures are a result of Islamic teachings.
We should implement a
policy of containment of the Islamic world, but for this to work we will
sometimes have to take military action to crush Arab pretensions to
grandeur. The Islamic movement “has turned the civility of the United States
and Europe into a weapon and turned it against us. Hezbollah, Hamas, Al
Qaeda, the whole Islamic Jihad, are agents of nation states who want to
weaken the West by a proxy war.
We are in the middle of the largest
population boom and the largest migration waves in human history. Far more
people want to live in the West than we can possibly let in.
Europeans should adopt legislation securing the right to free speech.
European authorities are becoming increasingly totalitarian in their
censorship efforts to conceal the fact that they are no longer willing or
able to uphold even the most basic security of their citizenry. Europe needs
free speech more than ever.
Europe’s elites have lost contact with
the people, and the people have lost contact with reality. Utopian
multiculturalism, welfarism, radical feminism and transnationalism will all
soon come crashing down.
People tend to get the governments they
deserve. Maybe we get weak leaders because we are weak. Muslims blame
everybody else for their own failures because they can never admit the deep
flaws in their culture. We shouldn’t make the same mistake.
2.6 The European Court of Human Rights is a cultural Marxist
controlled political entity
The European Court of Human
Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg is an international judicial body established
in 1950 to monitor respect of human rights by states. It has become an
institution designed to protect and serve the foundations of European
political correctness/cultural Marxism/multiculturalism.
2.7 Waiting for Churchill or Godot?
Churchill understood Islam. In 1899, he wrote:
"How dreadful are the
curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical
frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is
this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries.
Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of
commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the
Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace
and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in
Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property,
either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction
of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among
men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities - but the influence of
the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No
stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund,
Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytising faith. It has already spread
throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were
it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the
science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern
Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."
2.8 The failure of Western feminism
As in war, the
winners seize the indigenous women all the while protecting their own. The
whole rhetoric that aims to debase the European woman or France is a part of
the feminisation of Europeans, of the idea that Europe is a land to be
conquered, a habitat open to all forms of pillage.
As a Western man,
I would be tempted to say that Western women have to some extent brought
this upon themselves. They have been waging an ideological, psychological
and economic war against European men for several generations now …
In the big scheme of things, the truth is that European men have treated
women with greater respect than the men of almost any other major
civilisation on earth.
The truth is that any nation is always
protected from external aggression by the men.
"Muslims are doing everything in their power to encourage their alpha boys
to be tough, aggressive, and ruthless. We teach our boys to be good
students, to aim at getting good jobs with large, safe corporations, to plan
prudently for their retirement. They want their boys to become holy
warriors. We are proud if our sons get into a good college; they are proud
if their sons die as martyrs. ... The end of testosterone in the West alone
will not culminate in the end of history, but it may well culminate in the
end of the West."
2.9 How the feminists paved the way for Islam
Radical feminism has been one of the most important
causes of the current weakness of Western civilisation, both culturally and
demographically. Feminists, often with a Marxist world view, have been a
crucial component in establishing the suffocating public censorship of
Political Correctness in Western nations. They have also severely weakened
the Western family structure, and contributed to making the West too soft
and self-loathing to deal with aggression from Muslims.
could prove lethal to Islam. Islam survives on the extreme subjugation of
women. Deprived of this, it will suffocate and die. Some men lament the loss
of a sense of masculinity in the modern world. Perhaps a meaningful role
could be to make sure that our sisters and daughters grow up in a world
where they have the right to education and a free life, and to protect them
against Islamic barbarism.
2.10 Feminism leads to the oppression
As Harvard University president, Lawrence
Summers in 2005 gave a speech where he dared to suggest that innate
differences between men and women could explain why men hold more seats as
top scientists than women.
One of the hallmarks of Western
civilisation has been our thirst for asking questions about everything.
Political correctness is thus anti-Western both in its form and in its
intent. Feminists formed the vanguard of PC, the ideology that has blinded
our universities to the Islamic threat.
When the long-term effects of
feminism finally set in, Western women may very well end up being genuinely
oppressed under the boot of Islam. Radical feminism thus leads to oppression
2.11 What is the cause of low birth rates?
The gap between the Western world and the Islamic world in
birth rates is clearly caused by religious factors, but the differences
between industrialised nations are far more difficult to explain.
Within Europe, where social security benefits are dangerously generous,
there are differences among countries. Some of the most generous schemes are
found in Germany, France, and the Mediterranean countries — as are the
lowest fertility rates in the region.
The best solution is also the
simplest: get the state out of the way.
2.12 The fatherless
The decade from the first half of the
1960s to the first half of the 1970s was clearly a major watershed in
Western history, with the start of non-Western mass immigration in the USA,
the birth of Eurabia in Western Europe, and the rise of multiculturalism and
radical feminism. The people who viciously attacked their own civilisation
enjoyed uninterrupted economic growth for decades, yet embraced
Marxist-inspired ideologies and decided to undermine the very society which
had allowed them to live privileged lives.
This was also the age of
decolonisation in Western Europe and desegregation in the USA, which created
an atmosphere where Western civilisation was seen as evil. Whatever the
cause, we have since been stuck in a pattern of eternal opposition to our
The current situation isn't sustainable. The
absence of fatherhood has created a society full of social pathologies. If
the West is to survive, we need to reassert a healthy dose of male
authority. In order to do so we need to roll back the welfare state. Perhaps
we need to roll back some of the excesses of Western feminism too.
2.13 The Western European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist intellectual
elite — who are they?
Marxists, suicidal humanists or capitalist globalists are all
multiculturalists. Multiculturalism is the European hate ideology which was
created to destroy Western civilisation. Multiculturalism has allowed
Islamic demographic warfare to be initiated.
The free society as we
have known it carries in itself the forces of its own destruction. Once
freedom has been achieved it is taken for granted and ceases to be valued,
and the free growth of ideas, which is the essence of a free society, will
bring about the destruction of the foundations on which it depends.
2.14 Labour wanted mass immigration to engineer multicultural UK
Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially
engineer a "truly multicultural" country and "rub the Right's nose in
diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair,
Jack Straw and David Blunkett. He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a
deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers
were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would
alienate its "core working class vote". As a result, the public argument for
immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more
2.15 Labour cynically plotted to transform the entire
make-up of Britain
By Melanie Phillips
For years, as the number of
immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was
how exactly this had happened. Now we learn that the Labour government has
been engaged upon a deliberate and secret policy of national cultural
So that's how New Labour views the white working class,
supposedly the very people it is in politics to champion. Who can wonder
that its core vote is now decamping in such large numbers to the BNP when
Labour treats them like this?
2.16 Why the discipline of
sociology must be completely removed from academia
described as a revolutionary tool for change by Marxist intellectuals.
Students of sociology are taught how the public apparatus may be used (by
deliberately manipulating statistics, and rejecting all aspects of biology)
to portray and propagate a Marxist world view. Faculties of sociology are
Marxist indoctrination camps where the students learn how to infiltrate
public institutions and covertly contribute to change the character of
society by presenting falsified reports and statistics.
psychology of cultural Marxists
One of the most widespread
manifestations of the craziness of our world is multiculturalism, so a
discussion of the psychology of multiculturalists can serve as an
introduction to the discussion of the problems of Western Europe in general.
The two psychological tendencies that underlie cultural Marxists we call
feelings of inferiority and over-socialisation. Feelings of inferiority are
characteristic of cultural Marxism as a whole, while over-socialisation is
characteristic only of a certain segment of cultural Marxism.
someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or
about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has feelings of
inferiority. Those who are most sensitive about "politically incorrect"
terminology are activists, many of whom do not even belong to any
"oppressed" group but come from privileged strata of society.
Cultural Marxists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion
or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the cultural
Marxist of the over-socialised type. But compassion and moral principle
cannot be the main motives for cultural Marxist activism. For example, if
one believes that affirmative action is good for Muslims, it would make
sense to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at
least verbal and symbolic concessions to non-Muslims who think that
affirmative action discriminates against them. But cultural Marxist
activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their
own hostility and frustrated need for power.
2.18 Democracy and
the media bias
In democratic societies the press, the
Fourth Estate, should supposedly make sure that the government does its job
properly as well as raise issues of public interest. In practice, we now
seem to have a situation where the political elites cooperate with the media
on making sure that some topics receive insufficient or unbalanced attention
while others are simply kept off the agenda altogether.
politics is more and more becoming an empty ritual. The real decisions are
taken before the public even get a chance to vote on them, and the media
won't talk honestly about important matters. Our daily lives are run by a
bloated bureaucracy which is becoming increasingly transnational.
I've suggested before that native Europeans face three enemies
simultaneously when fighting against the Islamisation of their lands: Enemy
1 is the anti-Western bias of our media and academia, which is a common
theme throughout the Western world. Enemy 2 are Eurabians and
EU-federalists, who deliberately break down established nation states in
favor of a pan-European superstate. Enemy 3 are Muslims.
The EUSSR/USASSR media hegemony
Living in Western Europe we are told
that the news media are free. It is certainly true that there are few
government conspiracies to censor. Unlike in totalitarian countries, the
media are not generally state run or controlled. But this is not the full
There are six reasons why the Western European media do not
give a balanced view of world events:
1. Almost all journalists support
2. Most media outlets are owned by multinational companies
3. Advertising and ratings
4. News sources
5. Negative responses
Demonisation and use of language
The Western European
multiculturalist regimes subsidise multiculturalist newspapers. The
so-called "free press" in Western Europe is a myth and has never existed.
2.20 Pro Muslim media strategies
Western Europeans are spoon
fed with inaccuracies every single day. There is a disproportional balance
that indirectly or directly protects Islam. Jihadi attacks are
systematically covered up, ignored or toned down by Western journalists.
Telling the truth would undermine multiculturalism.
Whitehall guide lists words they should not use when talking about terrorism
in public and gives politically correct alternatives. They are told not to
refer to Muslim extremism as it links Islam to violence. Instead, they are
urged to talk about terrorism or violent extremism. Fundamentalist and
Jihadi are also banned because they make an "explicit link" between Muslims
and terror. Ministers should say criminals, murderers or thugs instead.
2.21 Questions and polls your government and news agencies have
Why haven't the following polls and questions been raised
and presented to Europeans?
1. Do you support mass Muslim immigration?
2. Do you support the Islamisation of Europe?
3. Do you trust your
government regarding mass Muslim immigration?
4. Do you support the
implementation of the EU's Eurabia project?
5. Do you want Europe to
merge with the Islamic world?
6. Do you see Islamisation as a threat to
7. Do you support the building of mosques in Europe?
you support expelling Muslims?
9. Would you support revoking citizenship
10. Would you support your government to stop Islamic
11. Would you support the deportation of Muslims
12. Would you support the creation of armed resistance
13. Would you support strikes by these groups against your
Everyone knows how the majority would respond:
question 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7
YES to 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
This is why
no one has presented these questions or polls.
2.22 Dealing with
journalists: authorising your own character assassination by the
multiculturalist PC press
When confronted, approach all journalists
with extreme prejudice. Western European journalists are not representative
of the opinion of the people but instead represent a cultural Marxist,
humanist and globalist world view.
Western Europe today lacks the
balance of cultural conservative news agencies. A majority of countries do
not have any objective agencies but are rather completely monopolised by
multiculturalist agencies, or rather political entities. Unless you are a
master at this game you should never give direct interviews and you should
never agree to give interviews unconditionally.
2.23 Understanding the fundamentals behind multiculturalism
Titans to lemmings: the suicide of Europe
brilliant German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche stated that Christianity
would be abandoned en masse in the twentieth century but that Westerners
would still cling to this inversion of morality. Marxists and liberals
exploit this inversion of morality by creating large numbers of "victim
groups" who form minorities in Western society but whose "victim status" is
used to dictate morality to the majority. Multiculturalists prosecute their
self-righteous moral crusade by proudly championing the cause of anybody who
they deem to be weak and oppressed.
The core principle of liberals
and multiculturalists is that everybody is equal. In the fluffy bunny la-la
land of these vain zealots, the sexes are equal; all ethnic groups are
equal; all sexuality is equal; all children are equal and children are equal
to adults; animals are equal to humans; all cultures are equal and all
religions are equal.
Pursuing equality is to clash with Mother
nature. Nature abhors equality. Look at males and females. Some males are
strong, others are weak. Equality is just as scarce among women. Feminists
claim that women have been victims of men, that men have oppressed women for
centuries and that the sexes are equal. But equalising the sexes has led to
a crippling feminisation of Western society.
If I say: "Judaism and
Christianity are two religions whose morality and values took mankind
further than any other religion and they are largely peaceful and tolerant
religions", it would be difficult to disagree with me. But if I say: "Islam
is an evil, retarded and supremacist death-cult that refuses to afford women
and unbelievers respect and the most basic of human rights because Islam
advocates violence to force submission to Allah", I will be smeared as an
Islamophobe and a racist.
One way street
Why is it that only
the West plays the multicultural game? If all races are equal, why aren't
the Chinese, the Japanese, the Koreans, the Arabs, the Pakistanis, the
Indians, the Africans all accepting masses of immigrants into their lands
and allowing alien cultures and religions to be of equal importance to their
If all ethnical groups and all cultures are equal, why is it
black Africans, Afro-Caribbean blacks, Pakistanis, Indians, Chinese, and
Eastern Europeans want to abandon their own lands en masse to live in the
lands of the West?
If all races and all cultures and all religions
were truly equal, the rest of the world would be falling over themselves to
welcome masses of immigrants from all over the world into their lands to
enrich their people with the delights of diversity in the name of equality
It is very easy to be pious about equality and
multiculturalism when you live in an advanced, wealthy society. It is far
less easy to eulogise about multiculturalism and equality when you live in a
violent, unjust and less advanced poverty-stricken society. Maybe this
explains why we don't see many ranting multicultural disciples demanding the
imposition of equality in countries such as Iran. They know as well as you
do what would happen if they tried to. Such is the folly of claiming
equality between peoples and cultures.
A very unequal equality
The doctrine of multiculturalism is only ever applied against Western -
make that white - people.
Identity politics is a good example of
this. Blacks, Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus, Chinese, Pakistanis, Indians -
all of these people and more are allowed to form their own special groups
with the aim of protecting and furthering their own interests based entirely
on race or creed. Yet if indigenous Westerners form their own special
interest group, they will be outrageously and hypocritically vilified as
"racists" and "fascists".
Multiculturalism and the fantasy world of
equality only apply to the West and are applied using exactly the moral
inversion predicted by Nietzsche. It is a madness that is leading the entire
white race into the abyss.
A grand deception
The folly of
multiculturalism and its mantra of equality is one of the biggest con-tricks
ever played on a people. British people who suffer the consequences of
multiculturalism allow those who do not to appear virtuous and righteous
with their "we're all equal" mantra and to lie and deceive at every turn to
protect their own selfish interests.
Nietzsche foresaw, the godless religion of Marxism, with its evil twins
liberalism and multiculturalism, works by creating "victim groups" who are
then used to destroy Western society by inverting morality and demanding
more and more from society to compensate for their unjust oppression.
Equality is used to support the cause of these victims. From equality of
the sexes to equality of the races, Marxists need victims for their rotten
ideology to flourish. The attitude of the Third World to the West is that
what's yours is ours and what is ours is our own. It is a despicable
attitude that is reducing the West to a life-support machine for other less
Mother nature will demand they pay the heaviest price
for their arrogance. She will not care one iota if the entire white race has
to pay too.
2.24 Ignorance and multiculturalism must be destroyed
By D.L. Adams
There are two critical impediments that prevent the
West from engaging effectively, or at all, in the existential conflict with
Islam. Ignorance and multiculturalism must be deconstructed and
It is a moral and ethical failure to be ignorant of
the purposes and doctrine of political Islam. Ignorance of an existential
enemy is shameful and indefensible. Multiculturalism must be exposed for the
disastrous pseudo-philosophy of ignorance that it is. Founded upon ignorance
and silly utopian anti-intellectualism, multiculturalism prevents us from
responding to political Islam because to do so in our morally bankrupt
multicultural world is seen as intolerance. Defending your nation from
cultural and literal annihilation is not intolerance. It is the height of
patriotism and rationality.
The fundamental dual concepts of
multiculturalism are tolerance and inclusiveness. These concepts are founded
upon the idea that all cultures are of equal value and that differences
between cultures are to be applauded and accepted rather than condemned,
even when such condemnation is appropriate.
There has long been a
concept in the United States regarding immigration and assimilation that if
we show newcomers to our shores how nice, welcoming, and good we are, they
will all become Americans. This model has worked for generations with
European, Asian, South Americans and immigrants from across the world. Islam
does not fit this model.
Islam does not assimilate. Islam is about
submission. Adherents of the "religion of peace" are interested only in
bringing the entire world under Allah's religion. For adherents of this
miserable and cruel political ideology of hate and conquest, only one
religion, one political system, and one culture is allowed — that of Allah
and Mohammed. All others are to be annihilated.
the tool by which Islam infiltrates our institutions and political systems.
Islam is at war with all non-believers everywhere and forever. This is
called jihad or fighting in Allah's cause. Multiculturalism and ignorance
are the greatest weaknesses of the cultures of the West.
has failed because resurgent Islam has no interest in assimilation.
Multiculturalists refuse to believe this. We in the West must accept the
literal truth that some cultures are unpleasant and have belief systems that
are contrary to ours. The idea that everyone loves freedom is a broken and
confused concept. In Islam. the only freedom that is considered of value is
the complete submission to Allah and the doctrine of Islam. Islam sees
freedom in total submission to the doctrine of Islam.
When we open
our doors to Islam, we open ourselves and our nations to forces that reject
our concepts of tolerance and inclusiveness. This is the absurdity and
horror of multiculturalism.
We must learn the doctrine of Islam. This
is about nothing less than our existential survival as non-Islamic countries
and cultures. We must dispel our ignorance of Islam. All cultures are not
equivalent. Some cultures are better than others, and some are our enemies
and some our friends. This is reasonable, rational thinking.
Multiculturalism is the tool by which Islam gains access to our countries
for the purpose of the destruction of the host culture. The doctrine of
Islam is clear on these points. Jihad is a responsibility for all Muslims.
It is the command of both Allah and Mohammed. When we know nothing of Islam,
we lose. Ignorance of Islam is not acceptable. It is a moral and ethical
failure. Multiculturalism is a tool of Islam. Multiculturalism must be
2.25 Is capitalism always a force for freedom?
More companies are now giving in to Muslim pressure over Geert Wilders'
Islam-critical movie. One does not have to be a socialist to see that the
short-term interests of big business are not always identical to the
long-term interests of the nation as a whole, especially not when it comes
to immigration. Multinational corporations, which by definition have loyalty
toward no nation, should not be allowed to direct national immigration
Companies that support mass immigration because they want
easy access to cheap labour, including Muslim immigration, contribute to
Islamisation, at home and abroad.
2.26 Big business, a driving force behind immigration
In Britain, the House of Lords has reported that the
economic impact of immigration is minimal and has concluded that it ought to
be capped. The report is seen as a decisive defeat for the government's
long-held view that immigration boosts the economy by increasing production.
Big business is in favour of immigration not only because it drives down
wages but also because it is culturally in favour of multiculturalism.
Multinational companies are vehicles of cosmopolitanism, every bit as
powerful and influential as the more intellectual proponents of
multiculturalism and the end of the nation-state.
The big corporation
likes immigration because immigrants drive down wages and are typically not
unionised. Big companies do not care if immigrants do not pay taxes, or if
they make extra demands on schools and hospitals, because the state picks up
the bill for that. Big companies operate on the principle "privatize the
profits, socialise the losses", demanding that policies be pursued which
increase their income because the costs are passed onto the taxpayer and
society at large.
2.27 Migration has brought 'zero' economic benefit
Philip Johnston and Robert Winnett
Ten years of record immigration to
Britain has produced virtually no economic benefits for the country, a
parliamentary inquiry has found. "Our overall conclusion is that the
economic benefits of net immigration to the resident population are small
and close to zero in the long run."
The population is increasing by
more than 190 000 every year, largely as a result of immigration. Foreign
workers now make up 12.5% of the labour force, compared with 7.4% a decade
ago. Critics say Labour lost control of the borders, issued too many work
permits and should not have opened up the labour market to eastern Europe.
David Coleman, a professor of demography at Oxford University, said in
his evidence to the committee that the Government had excluded costs from
crime, security, the race relations process, health "tourism" and imported
ailments such as tuberculosis.
2.28 What does Muslim immigration cost Europe?
Sweden's finance minister Pär Nuder says more immigrants
should be allowed into Sweden in order to safeguard the welfare system. But
estimates indicate that immigration costs Sweden at least 40 to 50 billion
Swedish kroner every year, probably several hundred billions, and has
greatly contributed to bringing the Swedish welfare state to the brink of
The number of rape charges in Sweden has quadrupled in
just above twenty years. Rape cases involving children under the age of 15
are six times as common today as they were a generation ago. Resident aliens
from Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia dominate the group of rape
In June 2006, a report from NHO, the Confederation of
Norwegian Enterprise, stated that the current immigration policies were a
serious threat to the country's economy. Norway is the planet's third
largest exporter of oil, next to Saudi Arabia and Russia. Yet according to
NHO, there is a risk that much of the profit Norway earns from oil could be
spent on paying welfare for a rapidly growing immigrant population.
Danish think tank has estimated that the net cost of immigration was up to
50 billion kroner every year. Denmark could save huge sums by stopping
immigration from less developed countries. A study found that every other
immigrant from the Third World — especially from Muslim countries — lacked
the qualifications for even the most menial jobs on the organised Danish
Professor Kjetil Storesletten at the University of
Oslo said that the net contribution of immigrants to the economy was
probably negative in Norway, too: "Admitting immigrants with low levels of
education leads nowhere. We cannot continue the immigration policies we have
followed until now."
There are now several researchers who predict
that in Norway, Sweden and Denmark, the native population and their
descendants will become a minority in their own country within this century.
In the spring of 2006, police were deployed at a Berlin school after
teachers complained that they could not cope with their students' aggression
and disrespect. A teacher who recently left the school told the Tagesspiegel
newspaper that ethnic Arab pupils were bullying ethnic Turks, Germans and
other nationalities. "School for them," said Petra Eggebrecht, former
director of the Rütli school, "is simply a place to fight for peer
recognition, where young criminals become idols."
In 2005, it was
reported that 82% of crimes in Copenhagen were committed by immigrants or
descendants of immigrants, and the police pressed charges against
second-generation immigrants five times as frequently per capita as against
ethnic Danes. Doormen working in the Danish capital are now often armed with
guns or clubs so as to be able to defend themselves against violent
A Norwegian researcher warned that ethnic gangs
could give Norway the kind of immigrant-related organised crime that had
previously been unknown in Scandinavia. Arne Johannessen from the Norwegian
Police Organisation warned in 2003 that the cost of crime may have been
doubled during the previous decade, in part due to immigration.
Sweden, there has been a steep rise in all kinds of crime and violence at
the same time as an unprecedented amount of immigration to the country. The
Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet revealed that 9 out of the 10 most criminal
ethnic groups in Sweden were Muslims.
In the Netherlands, there has
been no overall economic benefit to population change since unskilled guest
workers were invited to the Netherlands in the early 1970s. According to
Paul Scheffer, a leading critic of multiculturalism and professor of urban
sociology at Amsterdam University, up to 60% of first-generation Turkish and
Moroccan populations are unemployed.
Former French PM Charles de
Gaulle, disappointed by the loss of the French colonies in Africa and the
Middle East, as well as with France's waning influence in the international
arena, in the 1960s, decided to create a strategic alliance with the Arab
and Muslim world to compete with the dominance of the United States and the
Soviet Union. This alliance became the position of the European Community
during the 1970s.
2.29 Current and recent Jihads in Asia and Africa
systematically murdered more than 300 million individuals and enslaved more
than 300 million the last 1400 years. The Jihads and genocides are
continuing all over the world.
2.30 Overview of Jihadi terror attacks
None of the European media
organisations makes any attempt to track or create overviews of Jihadi
2.31 Muslim persecution of Christians
By Robert Spencer
persecution by Muslims has become a familiar narrative, repeated with
terrifying frequency in Muslim controlled areas throughout the world, but
especially in the Middle East.
The religious cleansing of Christians
in the Muslim world does not surprise anyone familiar with the origins of
Islam. The prophet Muhammad declared: "I will expel the Jews and Christians
from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslims."
Converts from Islam to Christianity are often hunted in the Muslim world,
where virtually all religious authorities agree that such individuals
deserve death. Muhammad himself commanded such a punishment: "Whoever
changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.”
There is an evasiveness
in some Muslims' claim that Islam recognises Christianity as a legitimate
faith. For the Christianity that the Qur’an recognises is not Christianity
as millions practice it around the world today. Muslims found that the New
Testament affirmed the Christian understanding of Jesus that the Qur’an
repudiated, and contained no trace of an idea that a later prophet would
come with a final revelation. Thus Muslims began to teach that Christians
had corrupted the pure Gospel that was given to Jesus by Allah. This is a
key source of much of the enduring enmity between Muslims and Christians.
2.32 Christians in the Middle East
The ethno-religious cleansing of
Christian peoples in the Middle East alternate between military suppression
and political oppression. In Egypt, the large Coptic nation is
systematically discriminated against on the constitutional, political,
administrative, and cultural levels. Para-military fundamentalist groups are
conducting pogroms against the Christians.
In Sudan, abundant reports
by international human rights organisations have documented the enslavement
by the northern fundamentalist forces of southern African Christians.
According to the reports and experts, there are today up to a million black
slaves from Sudan who have either been taken to the north of that country to
work or sold in other Arab countries.
2.33 Fighting for their survival — A Christian exodus from the Arab world
Amira El Ahl, Daniel Steinvorth, Volkhard Windfuhr and Bernhard Zand
Violence, terrorism and the Islamists' growing influence pose a threat to
Christianity in the Middle East. In some countries, members of an unpopular
Christian minority are already fighting for their survival — or fleeing for
There are no reliable figures on the size of Christian
minorities in the Middle East. This is partly attributable to an absence of
statistics, and partly to the politically charged nature of producing such
statistics in the first place.
Christians are often better educated
and more affluent than their Muslim neighbours. Many Middle Eastern
Christians now have relatives in Europe, North America and Australia who
help them emigrate. Their high level of education increases their chances of
obtaining visas. Those who leave are primarily doctors, lawyers and
2.34 Converts in the Muslim world
Converts from Islam to Christianity
are often hunted in the Muslim world, where virtually all religious
authorities agree that such individuals deserve death. Muhammad himself
commanded such a punishment: "Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then
kill him." This is still the position of all the schools of Islamic
jurisprudence, although there is some disagreement over whether the law
applies only to men, or to women also.
2.35 Text book Jihad in Egypt
By Andrew G. Bostom
Egyptian school children anti-infidel jihad hatred is a long, ongoing, and
ignoble tradition even within the modern era. As the scholar E. W. Lane
reported after several years of residence in both Cairo and Luxor (initially
in 1825-1828, then in 1833-1835):
"I am credibly informed that children in
Egypt are often taught at school a regular set of curses to denounce upon
the persons and property of Christians, Jews, and all other unbelievers in
the religion of Mohammad."
Sadly, the sacralised hatred of jihad is
still being inculcated as part of the formal education of Muslim youth
throughout the Muslim world.
2.36 The Afghan-Bosnian mujahideen network in Europe
By Evan F. Kohlmann
European leaders have finally become aware of a lurking extremist threat
that has been brewing in dark corners across the continent for almost two
decades. Western European democracies — many of whom thought that they were
insulated from the threat of organised international terrorism — are
discovering growing numbers of disaffected Muslim youth, hardened by scenes
of televised bloodshed in the Middle East and the unwelcoming demeanor of
some "native" Europeans. Frustrated by a perceived lack of social or
political mobility, these men eventually become ideal recruits for the
growing network of "pan-European mujahideen."
The United Kingdom has
been and remains one of the most active bases of radical Islam across
Western Europe. Certainly, it can be said that the Iranian revolution and
the war in Afghanistan together started the ball rolling for the Sunni
British fundamentalist movement. However, their ideas did not begin to have
a wide appeal among local Muslim youths until the era of Bosnia-Herzegovina.
When scenes of devastation and war crimes began to air on BBC television
broadcasts, many British Muslims were shocked that such horrific events
could take place in modern Europe.
Scandinavia has become an
important tactical base for Islamic militant groups from the Middle East.
Countries like Norway, Sweden, and Denmark are perceived as tolerant and
willing to grant political asylum even to militant leaders on the run from
law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
2.37 Justification of Muslim crime against non-Muslims
the Salafists, non-Muslims are lesser people. By saying this they justify
the behaviour of young Muslim criminals who target the non-Muslims whilst
they never touch fellow Muslims. They told me that drug trafficking is
perfectly acceptable as long as one only sells to non-Muslims. They told me
that stealing from non-Muslims is allowed as long as one does not harm
2.38 The real roots of Muslim hatred
By Andrew G. Bostom
Fundamentalism and its accompanying "Muslim rage" may derive from a steady
decline in the geopolitical power of Muslim states, evidenced, most
dramatically, by the official dissolution of the Ottoman Caliphate after
World War I, and the creation of the state of Israel after World War II.
An obvious alternative explanation for the etiology and persistence of
Muslim animus toward non-Muslims is what Muslim children, for generations,
have been taught to think about the infidel "other," regardless of the
"Only Koranic criticism can
help Muslims to look at their Holy Scripture in a more rational and
objective way, and prevent young Muslims from being fanaticised by the
Koran’s less tolerant verses ... My priority would be the wholesale rewriting
of school texts, which at present preach intolerance of non-Muslims,
particularly Jews. One hopes that education will encourage critical thinking
2.39 The ongoing civil war in Europe — Muslims want autonomous territory,
not better integration
From the desk of The Brussels Journal, 10.2006
Radical Muslims in several of France's local communities are waging an
undeclared "intifada" against the police.
2.40 Muslim atrocities committed against Western Europeans 1960-2010
The following report includes Muslim atrocities committed against indigenous
Europeans from 1960-2010. It also includes projections to 2020 based on
historical numbers. The report includes atrocities such as murder, indirect
murder, rape, gang rape, robberies, beatings, arson and more. ...
reason we now live in a bunkered society is that Muslims are among us. These
Muslim perpetrators view Europe as "dar-al-Harb" (house of war), as taught
in the Quran. As such, the exploitation and pillaging of European resources
and people is the divine right of all Muslims. A kafr/infidel is an
individual regarded as human garbage to a devout Muslim. The Muslims
therefore takes advantage of their Allah-given prerogative to rape, kill and
steal from Europeans as they view this as the spoils of war.
Muslims must be considered as wild animals. Do not blame the wild animals
but rather the multiculturalist category A and B traitors who allowed these
animals to enter our lands, and continue to facilitate them. This is nothing
less than a genocide aided and abetted by our own elites, primarily Marxist,
suicidal humanist and capitalist globalist politicians and journalists. They
will eventually pay the ultimate price for their war crimes.
2.41 Various forms of Jihad
Islamists cannot wage all-out war on
Europe and expect to win. But they have a religious duty to try to wage
Jihad in some way and eventually conquer all countries. There are more
devious ways to conquer than straightforward war.
2.42 The Islamisation process in European countries
The Islamic takeover of a country or a region of the country is dependent on
the relative proportion of Muslims compared with non-Muslims, and/or the
influence of militant Muslims among the Muslim population. A higher
proportion of Muslims among the population drives the political development
along a certain path. Eight phases can be discerned:
society in peace
2. Muslim ghettoes
3. Preparations for jihad
Start of jihad
5. Development of jihad
6. Jihad and insurgency
Jihad to civil war
8. Victory for Islam
2.43 Islamisation process of Western countries from 1% to 100%
The process of the Islamisation of a country starts off from small
issues and specific demands or requirements, and develops and increases
progressively with the increasing percentage of Muslims in a country. Here's
how it works:
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of
any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not
as a threat to anyone.
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytise from
other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from
the jails and among street gangs.
Above 5%, they will exercise an
influence out of proportion to their percentage of the population: they will
push for the introduction of halal food and work for a ruling to let them
rule themselves under sharia.
Above 10%, they will increase
lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions, and any
non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats.
Above 20%, expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations,
sporadic killings, and church and synagogue burning.
Above 40%, you
get widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia
Above 60%, expect unfettered persecution of non-believers,
sporadic ethnic cleansing, and use of sharia as a weapon.
expect state-run ethnic cleansing and genocide.
At 100%, Muslims
start killing each other.
There are thousands of Islamic no-go zones
all across Europe, where non-Muslims cannot move freely without immediate
danger of getting assaulted, robbed, raped, beaten, or harassed by Muslim
gangs or individuals.
Islamisation or the creation of Islamic no-go
zones starts as soon as the first Muslim family moves into a neighbourhood.
A progressive dhimmitude begins for all non-Muslims as they show special
considerations towards the Muslims and yield to pressure to give the Muslims
an increasing number of concessions.
The moral of the story: you
cannot reason with Islam, you can only isolate it.
2.44 List of Muslim demands for Sharia in Europe
only the UK, Greece, Switzerland and the Nordic countries remove the cross
from their flags, Muslims will not feel discriminated against and there will
be no more terror attacks. ...
2.45 Saudi Arabia — The serpent's head
Saudi Arabia and other Arab
countries have spread Wahabism and other harsh forms of Salafism around the
world for the last 35 years. Saudi Arabia alone have spent more than 87
billion USD abroad the past two decades propagating Wahabism. The bulk of
this funding goes to the construction and operating expenses of thousands of
mosques, madrassas and Muslim cultural centers throughout the world. These
Islamic institutions are now found in every single country in the West,
accompanied by Imams who are "Saudi approved".
2.46 How many Muslims worldwide support militant Islam or Jihadi Salafism?
This is a complicated question with many facets. There is a big
difference between active support, sympathising and empathising with this
cause. An armed Jihad (armed struggle) always has specific goals. Jihadists
in the West have other objectives. They acknowledge that Islam is still very
weak in Europe. The moderate Muslims are playing "good cop" in this context.
They will blame poverty, modern colonialism, discrimination, stigmatisation
and other root causes as the reasons for the rise of Jihadi Salafism. They
will ask for concessions from European politicians and media in order to
"prevent" radical Islam.
2.47 Europe's Wahhabi lobby
By Stephen Schwartz — 10/06/2005, Warsaw
The Organisation for Security and Cooperation (OSCE), an international
body made up of 55 nations called for a day-long roundtable in Warsaw. The
topic was "Intolerance and Discrimination Against Muslims."
is political correctness personified. The status of Islam in Europe, which
has lately involved bloodshed in several countries, is viewed by OSCEcrats
as an intractable challenge. The do-gooders had to relegate the roundtable
on Muslims to a place outside the regular agenda of a weeklong "human
dimension" assembly in Warsaw. The event served as little more than a
platform for ranters and cranks from such countries as Britain and Denmark
who were there to defend radical Islam.
2.48 Leaving Islam — interview with an ex-Muslim
By Mohammad Asghar/Jamie
Mohammad Asghar is an ex-Muslim who came out of Islam after
discovering its true teachings. Together with studying the Quran for over
twenty-five years, he has also been writing his commentary on its verses —
an endeavor, he hopes, that will help non-Muslim leaders, as well as
ordinary citizens, understand the true messages they convey to Muslims.
Asghar: "I no more subscribe to the teachings and the doctrines of
Islam, as I consider them to be obnoxious and, thus, unfit for good humans."
Aghar: "Apart from the Jews and the Christians, the Muslims also hate
the Pagans from the core of their hearts, as they, according to the Quran,
are unclean, and, thus, unworthy of living on Allah's earth. Therefore, the
Muslims must kill them whenever they get the chance to fulfill the
instruction Allah gave them through the Quran."
Asghar: "I am
saddened by the fact that the West has not learned anything from the Quran,
the history of Islam and from its adherents."
(1885-1981): "The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story
in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that
civilisation is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and
freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians
invading from without or multiplying within."
Freedom of religion and
individual liberties are for those who value them and respect them.
2.49 Moderate Muslims and the Islamisation of Europe
Muslim is one who wants to closely follow the Quran and the examples and
principles of the perfect model of a man for all future and for all the
world, Muhammed. And any true Muslim naturally wants to implement sharia
laws which are just consequences of the Quran and the sunnah. Such a person
cannot in any sense be described as an extreme Muslim. Moderate Muslims in
the West cannot pick and choose the parts of the doctrine that they like.
That is forbidden by the religion.
A moderate Muslim is not a
reform-minded Muslim, who is willing to eliminate some, many or all those
principles of Islam that violate human rights. The moderate Muslims want
pretty much the same things as the Islamists. The main goal is then partial
or full implementation of sharia laws in Europe. The content of the sharia
is mainly political; just a small part regards religion as defined in the
West. The contents violate human rights and accepted political principles in
2.50 Why we cannot rely on moderate Muslims
Omar Ahmad, the long-serving chairman of CAIR, the Council on
American-Islamic Relations, reportedly told a crowd of California Muslims in
July 1998, "Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to
become dominant. The Koran ... should be the highest authority in America,
and Islam the only accepted religion on earth."
controversial refugee, Mullah Krekar, says there's a war going on between
the West and Islam, and that Islam will win: "We're the ones who will change
you. Just look at the development within Europe, where the number of Muslims
is expanding like mosquitoes."
Italian journalist and novelist Oriana
Fallaci recalls how, in 1972, she interviewed the Palestinian terrorist
George Habash, who told her that the Arab goal was to wage war “against
Europe and America” and to ensure that henceforth "there would be no peace
for the West."
Muslim Brotherhood leader Muhammad Mahdi Othman Akef
said in 2004 to Arab media that America is Satan and will soon collapse:
"I have complete faith that Islam will invade Europe and America, because
Islam has logic and a mission."
Professor Moshe Sharon teaches
Islamic History at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem: "Peace in Islam can
exist only within the Islamic world; peace can only be between Moslem and
Moslem. ... With the non-Moslem world or non-Moslem opponents, there can be
only one solution — a cease fire until Moslems can gain more power. It is an
eternal war until the end of days. Peace can only come if the Islamic side
wins. The two civilisations can only have periods of cease-fires."
What counts isn't the difference, if any, between moderate Muslims and
radical Muslims, but between Muslims and non-Muslims, and between Muslims
and ex-Muslims. Ibn Warraq says that there may be moderate Muslims, but
Islam itself is not moderate.
2.51 Is Islam compatible with
In How the West Was Lost, author Alexander Boot outlines
what he thinks ails the modern West. It is a provocative book. Boot:
short, if one defines liberty as a condition that best enables the
individual to exercise his freedom of choice, then democracy of universal
suffrage is remiss on that score."
Immanuel Kant, in his Critique of
Pure Reason, methodically demolished all the traditional proofs for the
existence of God. Why wasn't he torn limb from limb in the streets of
Königsburg by outraged believers? Kant would probably have been killed had
he attempted the same thing in the Islamic world, which is one of the
reasons why the scientific and industrial revolutions took place in the
West, and not under Islam.
Galileo Galilei faced the Inquisition four
hundred years ago. The Multicultural Inquisition may not threaten to kill
you, but it does threaten to kill your career, and that goes a long way in
achieving the same result, whether your crime is claiming that the Earth
moves around the Sun or that not all cultures are equal.
Hayek writes in The Road to Serfdom: "Least of all shall we preserve
democracy or foster its growth if all the power and most of the decisions
rest with an organisation far too big for the common man to survey or
comprehend. Nowhere has democracy ever worked well without a great measure
of local self-government, providing a school of political training for the
people at large as much as for their future leaders."
philosopher Roger Scruton: "The personal state is characterised by a
constitution, by a rule of law, and by a rotation of office-holders. Its
decisions are collectively arrived at by a process that may not be wholly
democratic, but which nevertheless includes every citizen and provides the
means whereby each citizen can adopt the outcome as his own. Personal states
have an inherent preference for negotiation over compulsion and for peace
Scruton notes that the Western personal state is now under
pressure from two directions. Supranational institutions are destroying the
sense of membership from above, while massive immigration without
assimilation is destroying it from below. The European Union "is rapidly
destroying the territorial jurisdictions and national loyalties that have,
since the Enlightenment, formed the basis of European legitimacy, while
putting no new form of membership in their place."
that for the first time in centuries Islam appears to be "a single religious
movement united around a single goal," and that "one major factor in
producing this unwonted unity is Western civilisation and the process of
globalisation that it has set in motion." Globalisation "offers militant
Islam the opportunity that it has lacked since the Ottoman retreat from
central Europe." It has brought into existence "a true Islamic umma, which
identifies itself across borders in terms of a global form of legitimacy,
and which attaches itself like a parasite to global institutions and
techniques that are the by-products of Western democracy."
Qutb: "When the Believer scans whatever man, ancient or modern, has known,
and compares it with his own law and system, he realises that all this is
like the playthings of children or the searchings of blind men in comparison
with the perfect system and the complete law of Islam. And when he looks
from his height at erring mankind with compassion and sympathy at its
helplessness and error, he finds nothing in his heart except a sense of
triumph over error and nonsense."
Qutb: "What are the Arabs without
Islam? What is the ideology that they gave, or they can give to humanity if
they abandon Islam? The only ideology the Arabs advanced for mankind was the
Islamic faith which raised them to the position of human leadership. If they
forsake it they will no longer have any function or role to play in human
Ibn Warraq: "Islam is a totalitarian ideology that aims to
control the religious, social and political life of mankind in all its
aspects - the life of its followers without qualification, and the life of
those who follow the so-called tolerated religions to a degree that prevents
their activities from getting in the way of Islam in any manner. And I mean
Islam. I do not accept some spurious distinction between Islam and Islamic
fundamentalism or Islamic terrorism. Given the totalitarian nature of
Islamic law, Islam does not value the individual, who has to be sacrificed
for the sake of the Islamic community. Collectivism has a special sanctity
The Christian Science Monitor interviewed a group of
followers of Hizb ut-Tahrir, the Party of Liberation, in Jordan. They say
that a single Islamic state from Indonesia to Morocco will bring prosperity
and let Muslims conquer the West. Hizb ut-Tahrir activist Abu Mohammed:
"Islam obliges Muslims to possess power so that they can intimidate — I
would not say terrorise — the enemies of Islam. And if after all discussions
and negotiations they still refuse, then the last resort will be a jihad to
spread the spirit of Islam and the rule of Islam."
Council for Fatwa and Research, whose leader is Yusuf al-Qaradawi, are
working on a Muslim Constitution for Europe that will be above national
Bernard Lewis in 2007 told The Jerusalem Post that Islam
could soon be the dominant force in Europe. He ironically warned that this
Islamisation could be assisted by immigration and democracy.
Muslim immigration, a culture of threats, legal and social harassment as
well as physical intimidation is gradually spreading in non-Muslim
countries. What Muslims cannot yet achieve by the sword, they will try to
achieve by lawyers backed by Arab oil money. The fear of an expensive court
battle is an effective weapon that can be used to silence critics of Islam.
Just as the planet is in the midst of an unprecedented population boom,
and technological advances have combined to produce the largest and fastest
migration waves in the history of mankind, many democratic nations have
become so bogged down by idealistic human rights legislation and naive open
border ideologies that they have now lost control over their own borders.
I am critical of the democratic system. I do not believe that it
automatically translates into individual liberty. Democratic nations may
have to undergo significant changes if the system of democracy is to survive
Muslims are afraid of freedom of speech. They want to
intimidate the critics of Islam into silence, while they continue
demographic conquest through immigration and high birth rates. They have
enjoyed considerable success with this strategy. Our present system of
democracy rewards those with high birth rates. A democracy cannot be
established in a genuinely Islamic country. It is a waste of time and money
to make the attempt.
Islam cannot tolerate freedom of speech, which
is its greatest weakness. The United States is well situated to make this
challenge. If the United States wants to maintain what it sees as its moral
leadership, it can begin by challenging Islamic censorship and intimidation.
2.52 Demography and the Islamisation of Europe
under siege by Islam. It is under demographic siege. In order for us, the
resistance, to do what is required of us we need to properly analyse and
comprehend demographic data. European demographic studies, especially in the
Balkans and elsewhere, confirm that the Global Islamic Ummah has
deliberately waged a demographic warfare against Eastern Europe since the
fall of the Christian Byzantine Empire.
In India as in Europe, the
Global Islamic Ummah is continuing the ongoing demographic warfare and is
seemingly successful. The India elites, just like European elites, are
aiding and abetting the Muslim conquest by way of appeasement.
According to a study commissioned by the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
newspaper, 56% of Germans said they believed a "clash of cultures" already
existed. 71% said they believed Islam to be "intolerant," some 91% said they
associated Islam with oppression of women. Asked if there should be a ban on
the building of mosques in Germany as long as the building of churches in
some Islamic states is forbidden, 56% agreed. There was even considerable
backing for ending Germany's constitutional right of freedom of religion
with regard to Islam. Asked if strict limits should be imposed on the
practice of Islam in Germany to protect the country, 40 per cent said they
would support such moves.
In a British poll from February 2010, 70%
expressed discontent with multiculturalism and Islamisation. 3 out of 5
Brits believe that the UK has become a broken country due to
multiculturalism. Voters are deeply pessimistic about the state of Britain
2.54 Europe's decline — Hurrah! We capitulate!
Gates of Vienna blog, 16 September 2008:
in EU countries will in the future be able to divorce according to sharia
law. The EU Commission recommends that a couple be able to choose which
country's law they will follow if they divorce.
destroys the Swedish model
Sweden was presented during
the Cold War as a middle way between capitalism and Communism. When this
model of a society collapses — and it will collapse, under the combined
forces of Islamic Jihad, the European Union, multiculturalism and
ideological overstretch — it is thus not just the Swedish state that will
collapse but the symbol of Sweden, the showcase of an entire ideological
It has been said jokingly that while other countries are
states with armies, Pakistan is an army with a state. Likewise, it could be
argued that Sweden started out being a nation with a bureaucracy and ended
up being a bureaucracy with a nation. Swedes pay the highest tax rates of
any (supposedly) free nation, and for this they get flawed social security,
non-existent physical security and a state apparatus dedicated to their
Opinion polls have revealed that two out of three Swedes
doubt whether Islam can be combined with Swedish society, and a significant
proportion of the population have for years wanted more limitations on
immigration. Yet not one party represented in parliament is genuinely
critical of multicultural society.
2.56 Islamisation and
cowardice in Scandinavia
As German journalist Henryk
Broder put it after the 2006 riots over the Danish cartoons of Muhammad:
"Objectively speaking, the cartoon controversy was a tempest in a teacup.
But subjectively it was a show of strength and, in the context of the 'clash
of civilisations,' a dress rehearsal for the real thing. The Muslims
demonstrated how quickly and effectively they can mobilise the masses, and
the free West showed that it has nothing to counter the offensive."
In 2008, three years after the cartoons were first published, the matter is
still very much alive in the minds of many Muslims. More than 200 lawmakers
shouted "Death to the enemies of Islam" during an angry demonstration
outside the Afghan parliament, protesting the reprinting of the cartoons in
Denmark and the release of the Islam-critical film Fitna by the Dutch
politician Wilders. Danish aid is helping schools to re-open in Afghanistan,
even though critics say the curriculum is based on fundamentalist Islam.
Bruce Bawer, author of the book While Europe Slept: "Sweden took another
route. When a political website featured a Jyllands-Posten cartoon, the
government sent police to close it down. More recently, hit with his own
cartoon crisis involving artist Lars Vilks, Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt
not only met Muslim ambassadors, but was praised by one for his 'spirit of
The cartoon Jihad prompted Indonesia and Norway to
hold a Global Inter-Media Dialogue in June 2007 in Oslo. Keynote speaker at
the conference, Doudou Dične, the United Nations Special Envoy for racism,
xenophobia and intolerance, urged the media to actively participate in the
creation of a multicultural society, and expressed concerns that the
democratic process could lead to immigration-restrictive parties gaining
Large portions of the mainstream media had been working
according to similar ideas long before this conference. In Britain, leading
figures of the BBC have proudly announced that they actively promote
2.57 Our offensive national flag
Discrediting national flags as signs of bigotry is happening all over the
Western world. When I was at school, teachers spoke with pride about how a
little island in the north Atlantic turned a quarter of the world pink, but
now all teachers talk about is the slave trade and how we must hang our
heads in shame. I believe we need to feel pride in our gang. But all we ever
hear now is that we in England have nothing to be proud about.
2.58 Will the Netherlands survive the 21st century?
the Netherlands, there is talk of making Islamic holidays public holidays
because Holland is a "Judeo-Christian-Islamic" society, whatever that is.
There are plans for a Muslim-only hospital, and former Justice Minister Piet
Hein Donner stated that the Dutch should give Muslims more freedoms to
behave according to their traditions.
In September 2008 it was made
known that British authorities will formally accept rulings of sharia courts
on certain matters. Britain has not just culturally but also legally
surrendered to its new Muslim masters.
Britain belongs to a growing
group of nations where the authorities have more or less surrendered to
Islamic rule, openly promote Islamic culture, and harass those who resist.
One could add Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium, and probably France to the
list, which keeps growing. Norway, Spain, Austria, Germany and others are
not far behind.
The Netherlands is becoming an increasingly
totalitarian society as a direct result of mass immigration in general and
Muslim immigration in particular. The insightful Hans Janssen, Professor of
Modern Islamic Ideology at Utrecht University, stated that a peaceful
society that wishes to remain existent "will have to find a way to defend
itself through non-peaceful means from people who are not peaceful."
In September 2008, politician Geert Wilders said during a speech in
Parliament that Moroccans are colonising the Netherlands. According to
Wilders, Moroccans didn’t come there to integrate, but "to subjugate the
Dutch" and rule over them: "We lose our nation to Moroccan scum who go
through life while abusing, spitting and molesting innocent people. They
happily accept our dole, houses and doctors, but not our rules and values."
According to him there are two nations, one of "climate hysterics and
uncontrollable Islamisation," the other, "my nation," Geert Wilders said,
"that of the people who have to foot the bill and are being robbed and
threatened by Islamic street terrorists." Seven minutes after the speech
began, a "technical error" occurred in the television broadcast which was
mysteriously solved the very second Wilders finished his speech.
Before the rise of maverick politician Pim Fortuyn, the Dutch political
scene had to a great extent been a closed club whose members, regardless of
party affiliation, shared similar views. Since all those who were in
positions of power were in basic agreement, the will of the people could
safely be ignored. Journalists and rival politicians smeared Fortuyn as a
dangerous right-wing extremist. Indirectly, this led to his murder by a
left-wing activist who stated that he killed him on behalf of Muslims.
Filmmaker Theo van Gogh was murdered by Muslims. MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali has
been driven from the country. The Islam-critical MP Geert Wilders is still
there, but he is subject to similar smears as Fortuyn was about being a
racist, receives daily threats from Muslims and not-so-subtle hints from the
establishment that he should tone down his criticism of Muslim immigration.
The Dutch political elites are once again firmly in control of public
Wilders’ movie Fitna from March 2008 produced strong
reactions from Muslims on a global basis and condemnations from dhimmi
appeasers in the Western world. Although the short film didn't do anything
other than quote the Koran and statements by Muslim leaders, the United
Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon condemned it as offensively
anti-Islamic: "There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to
violence." The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour condemned
the tone and content of Fitna and noted that the Dutch and others should
prohibit any advocacy of racial or religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination or hostility. In plain words, they should ban
criticism of Islam.
My bet is still on Britain, or possibly Denmark,
as the first Western country to face a civil war due to Muslim immigration,
but the Netherlands is a potential candidate as well. The Dutch political
elites have chosen formal surrender and will enforce sharia and ban
everybody disagreeing with this as extremists.
What is happening in
Western Europe now is a textbook case of a situation where the social
contract is no longer upheld. The natives pay extremely high tax rates to
nation states that no longer protect their borders and are both unwilling
and incapable of upholding a bare minimum of law and order. The laws are in
any case no longer passed with our interest in mind, but by dedicated
multiculturalists and globalists specifically hostile to our interests. The
European Union is the very definition of tyranny.
Spanish and the Portuguese — Once and future dhimmis?
In May 2008, the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso,
stated that Islam is part and parcel of Europe and condemned the concept of
a clash of civilisations. "Islam today is part of Europe. It is important to
understand this. One should not see Islam as outside Europe. We already have
an important presence of Islam and Muslims among our citizens," Barroso told
a press conference after a dialogue between EU leaders and twenty high-level
representatives of Christianity, Judaism and Islam in Europe.
de Aristegui, the foreign affairs spokesman for the conservative Popular
Party, explains in his book The Jihad in Spain that, in schools throughout
the Muslim world, maps are used with Spain and Portugal coloured green
because they are still considered part of dar al-Islam, or the House of
The Socialist PM José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero was swept to
power by the Jihadist terrorist train bombings in Madrid in March 2004, the
largest peacetime attacks in Spain's modern history. He has been
surrendering his country to Muslims and mass immigration every day since
then. Zapatero, who has said that "sexual equality is a lot more effective
against terrorism than military strength," appointed a pregnant woman as
Minister of Defence in April 2008.
Muslims understand the term
"dialogue" in a way that differs sharply from that of Westerners. For them,
dialogue does not mean an attempt to rationally debate a topic in order to
arrive at the truth. Truth is already given: It's called sharia, and the
only dialogue that is acceptable is one that will lead to the implementation
of sharia, one way or the other.
Since its inception, Islam has been
waging an aggressive war against the rest of mankind, with the stated
purpose of bringing every single human being on earth under Islamic rule.
Infidels have been presented with only three options: Convert to Islam, die,
or submit under Islamic rule as a dhimmi. Islam hasn't changed in the last
1400 years. Unless we are prepared to accept conversion or dhimmi status, we
have to fight. The Spanish and the Portuguese knew that once.
2.60 Collusion between British government and Muslim terrorists
Gordon Brown and Business Secretary Lord Mandelson went to Saudi
Arabia and the Gulf states in the first week of November 2008 to ask them to
fund our faltering economies by putting billions into the International
Monetary Fund. In return they offered them some control over Britain and the
West. The Saudi regime is the motor behind Islamisation of the West.
Eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more
than Ł233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995. The Oxford
Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985, with Prince Charles as
its honorary patron, is the biggest Muslim educational centre in the United
Kingdom. The centre is built as a traditional Oxford college but includes a
minaret and a dome.
In November 2006, the British Home Office
distributed the pamphlet 'Multicultural Britain — a land of immigrants',
encouraging immigrants to come and enjoy the Human Rights Act and well-paid
jobs, in embassies across the world.
Rowan Williams, Archbishop of
Canterbury, was quoted in July 2008 as saying Christian doctrine is
offensive to Muslims, and criticising Christianity's history for its
violence, its use of harsh punishments and its betrayal of its peaceful
principles. His sent a conciliatory letter to Islamic leaders calling for an
alliance between the two faiths.
2.61 Kosovo — just another step
in the Islamisation of Europe
The opinion that Kosovo's unilateral
declaration of independence is illegal is shared by many countries in the
world, since it blatantly defies international agreements. For some
inexplicable reason, the U.S. and the big West European countries embraced
the self-proclaimed independence of this province in the Balkans, which is
inhabited by clans of ruthless terrorists.
An independent Kosovo is
dangerous for the cultural and social integrity of Europe. The Albanians and
other Muslims have been refusing for years to integrate in European society.
They have created countless problems in the UK, Italy, France, Germany, the
Balkans and many other places.
2.62 The Norwegian Inquisition —
sunset in the land of the midnight sun
Norwegian parliament, in April 2005 passed a new Discrimination Act. The act
says in pretty clear words that in cases of suspected direct or indirect
discrimination due to religion or ethnicity, Norwegians are guilty until
Scandinavia is a utopia lost. Previously quiet
Scandinavian nations now suffer Islamic terror threats and death threats
against people criticising Islam.
2.63 The anti-racist
In 2005, the Norwegian parliament passed a
new Discrimination Act prepared by then Minister of Integration from the
Conservative Party, Erna Solberg, who had earlier called for the
establishment of a sharia council in Norway.
A spokesman for the
right-wing Progress Party, Per Sandberg, feared that the law would
jeopardise the rights of law-abiding citizens. Reverse burden of proof is
combined with liability to pay compensation, which means that innocent
persons risk having to pay huge sums for things they didn't do.
Similar laws have been passed across much of Western Europe, encouraged by
the EU and the Council of Europe (CoE) in cooperation with international
Islamic organisations. The Norwegian law followed an initiative from the
CoE. There was virtually no public debate about this law.
as throughout the Western world, white-on-non-white violence is exceedingly
rare. The vast majority of racism and racist violence comes from non-whites
against whites, or between different groups of nonwhites. In Oslo, young
girls are raped; school-children are threatened with death, robbed and
assaulted. The police have warned against "an alarming rise in street
violence" in urban areas across the country. This is directly caused by mass
During the Multicultural craze of the 1990s, the
Norwegian left-wing author Torgrim Eggen warned against turbulence caused by
mass immigration. The solution to this was not to limit immigration, but to
limit criticism of immigration. According to him, xenophobia and opposition
to mass immigration should be viewed as a mental illness, and hence "the
solution to this xenophobia is that you should distribute medication to
those who are seriously affected."
Mohammed Bouyeri, born in
Amsterdam of Moroccan parents, killed Theo van Gogh as he was cycling in
Amsterdam on Nov. 2, 2004, shooting and stabbing before slashing his throat
and pinning a note to his body with a knife. "I did what I did purely out my
beliefs," he told judges while clutching a Koran. "I want you to know that I
acted out of conviction and not that I took his life because he was Dutch or
because I was Moroccan," but because he believed van Gogh insulted Islam in
his film criticising the treatment of Muslim women.
the political editor of Norwegian left-wing newspaper Dagbladet, wrote that
it should be considered a universal human right for people everywhere to
migrate wherever they want to. This would mean virtually certain
annihilation for a tiny, wealthy and naive Scandinavian nation.
concept of human rights is being used to eradicate an entire civilisation,
in the name of tolerance and diversity, and the natives are specifically
banned from protesting against this.
2.64 Discrimination and harassment against cultural conservatives
Bruce Bawer: "Only one sizable party in the country, the Sweden
Democrats, articulates most Swedes' concerns about their country's
immigration and integration policies. Again and again, it has been the
object of breathtakingly undemocratic treatment by the political
2.65 ANTIFA/Labour Jugend — State sponsored Marxist lynch mobs
The German newspaper Die Welt put up an online poll asking
their readers whether they thought it was OK to ban an anti-Islamisation
demonstration. According to the major blog Politically Incorrect, as of
midnight 86% disagreed with this policy. Suddenly, in the middle of the
night, thousands of votes miraculously came in and the poll ended with
exactly 50% in favor of the ban. Die Welt deleted the comment section
because many comments criticised the decision to ban the meeting.
The decision to silence
the demonstration against Islamisation was widely supported by the
authorities. Thomas Steg, spokesman for German Chancellor Angela Merkel,
stated that Berlin favored "intercultural dialogue." The German Interior
Ministry stated that "Such a gathering of populists and extremists harms the
co-existence that the city and Muslim citizens have striven for." Cologne
Mayor Fritz Schramma (CDU) said on public radio that "We don't want their
conference and along with a great majority of Cologne people we'll be
ANTIFA are often the useful and extended arm of
the current cultural Marxist/multiculturalist establishment. Most European
countries have groups like them, bashing, harassing and terrorising all
people who oppose or criticize mass Muslim immigration.
2.66 The only English charity organisation is branded as racist
while 215 Somali organizations are welcomed
of multiculturalism results in extremely disproportionate representation of
group oriented interest organisations. The only charitable organisation
working for the interest of English people is mocked and persecuted, being
labeled as a racist organisation, while thousands of other organisations
(215 working for the interest of Somalis, 92 for Pakistanis, even 144 for
black interest) are never criticised.
2.67 How the diversity industry/ethnic industries/sub-cultures such
as Hip-Hop in combination with unrestricted media rights contributes to
By John H. McWhorter
The rise of nihilistic rap has
mirrored the breakdown of community norms among inner-city youth over the
last couple of decades. It was just as gangsta rap hit its stride that
neighbourhood elders began really to notice that they’d lost control of
young black men, who were frequently drifting into lives of gang violence
and drug dealing.
2.68 How the West lost the Cold War
The Swedish group
Antifascistisk Aktion (AFA) are socialists, and as socialists they are
convinced that progress can only be made through struggle, and it is
implicit that they mean violent struggle: "If we want to fight against
capitalism, the working class needs to be united, and in order to be so
intolerance cannot be tolerated. However, if we want to fight against
intolerance we have to defeat capitalism as an extension of that struggle.
Hence anti-fascism, feminism and the struggle against homophobia go hand in
hand with the class struggle!"
Broderskapsrörelsen (The Brotherhood),
an organisation of Christian members of the Swedish Social Democratic Party,
has decided to establish a network for people of other faiths, which largely
seems to mean Muslims.
The Social Democrat Ola Johansson, a member of
the Brotherhood, has referred to the book Social Justice in Islam by Sayyid
Qutb, the notorious Muslim Brotherhood member who has become the spiritual
guide for Islamic Jihad terrorists worldwide, as a proof that Muslims
support the welfare state and can thus make common cause with the
The Nazis called themselves national socialists, and they
took the socialist component of their ideology quite seriously. They never
nationalised all assets of production as the Communists did. They left
nominal ownership in private hands, but production was in reality controlled
by the state. The Nazis were thus to the left, economically, compared to
many of the labour parties in Western Europe today.
Brotherhood were also fans of the European Fascist and Nazi movements in the
1930s, as they are of welfare state socialism now. Historian Walter Laqueur
notes similarities between Islam and Nazism. Ibn Warraq has used an outline
of the Fascist ideology made by Italian novelist Umberto Eco and found that
most of its defining hallmarks are shared by Islam.
sociologist Theodor Adorno was a member of the Frankfurt School and was
influenced by Georg Lukács, one of Gramsci's fellow cultural Marxists. The
Authoritarian Personality, a book carrying Adorno’s name but in reality
produced by the combined efforts of a number of people from the Frankfurt
School, was extremely influential in the United States in the generation
following WW2 and contributed to the Allied denazification program in
These writers were inspired by a Marxist worldview and
consistently refused to see the heavy socialist influences on the Nazi
ideology. Adorno and others argued that late capitalism had developed tools
to resist the rise of a socialist society, above all the use of popular
culture and education. They apparently concluded that what led to the rise
of the Nazis were traditional and conservative viewpoints.
Nazis weren’t conservatives. They should more properly be understood as a
revolutionary socialist movement. The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah
Arendt, published in 1951, was somewhat closer to understanding the
commonalities between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.
Amin al-Husayni, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Arab nationalist leader, a
leading force behind the establishment of the Arab League and a spiritual
father of the PLO, was a close collaborator with Nazi Germany and personally
met with Adolf Hitler. In a radio broadcast from Berlin he called upon
Muslims to kill Jews wherever they could find them. The SS leader Heinrich
Himmler said to propaganda minister Josef Goebbels that Islam was "a very
practical and attractive religion for soldiers."
In The Second World
War, Vol. I, Winston Churchill wrote about Adolf Hitler's autobiography Mein
Kampf: "Here was the new Koran of faith and war: turgid, verbose, shapeless,
but pregnant with its message."
Following the Cold War, the West was
stuck with a large fifth column in our media and academia of people who were
disappointed after the sudden collapse of the alternative to capitalism.
They have decided to pursue the course of a gradual transformation of
society through the education system and through destroying the family
structure. The radicals have renewed hope of a violent upheaval. With the
mass importation of Muslims, who have displayed such a wonderful talent for
violence, and with rising ethnic tensions within the West, maybe they can
finally get the armed revolution they were longing for.
2.69 The closing of civilisation in Europe
current problems are entirely self-inflicted. Not Islam is to blame.
2.70 Give the Nobel Peace Prize to Ayaan Hirsi Ali
The greatest challenge to world peace right now is global Jihad. I therefore
suggest that the next Peace Prize should be awarded to Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
members of national assemblies and parliaments can nominate candidates for
the Prize, I hereby challenge MPs from the Progress Party in my country, or
MPs from any infidel nation, to nominate Hirsi Ali. Other alternatives can
be mentioned, too. Ibn Warraq, Ali Sina and Wafa Sultan are all worthy
recipients of the Prize for their work and for championing the rights of one
of the most abused and oppressed groups of people on the planet: Former
Muslims who defy the traditional death penalty for leaving Islam.
would like my country to be remembered for something other than awarding the
Nobel Peace Prize to Yasser Arafat or for sponsoring the Palestinian
government and their terrorist cronies.
2.71 Nobel Peace Prize awarded for appeasement of Jihad ... again
Granting this year's Nobel Peace Prize to Finnish diplomat
Martti Ahtisaari, known for his role in establishing a Jihadist state in
Kosovo, makes the Peace Prize even more of a joke than it already was.
2.72 Green is the new Red — Stop Enviro-Communism!
You might know them as environmentalists, enviro-communists, eco-Marxists,
neo-Communists or eco-fanatics. They all claim they want to save the world
from global warming but their true agenda is to contribute to create a world
government led by the UN.
2.73 Consolidating the moderate cultural conservative forces of
The essence of consolidation for all European
cultural conservative is:
1. Defining who we are and whom we are willing to include or exclude
Describing the problem and what we want fixed
Conclusions/Solutions/The way ahead
strategy for phase 1: better communication and cooperation among cultural
Cultural Marxists/multiculturalists used
sociology, social psychology, linguistics, and a subtle understanding of
human motivation to get into our heads and change the way we processed
reality. Ending cultural Marxist/multiculturalist dominance will require us
to undo the vast memetic and ontological damage they've wrought on two
entire generations of Europeans.
2.75 Copying Marxist
organisational strategies and networks — locally, nationally and
The following study was conducted in Norway
but many of the results and findings apply locally, nationally and
2.76 Public opposition to Islamisation
translated into success for political parties
In the country
where the public is the most opposed to Islamisation, Greece, there is no
successful populist right party, but in two of the three Scandinavian
countries where the public is the least opposed to Islamisation, there is
such a party. Opposition to Islamisation is widespread in all Western
European countries. Why is this opposition not translated into success for
anti-immigrant parties in countries like Sweden, Germany and the UK? Germany
is a special case. The country still suffers from severe psychological
trauma and is simply unable to mount any form of political defence.
2.77 Cultural conservative/nationalist rhetorical strategies
Using appropriate rhetoric is essential in communicating a message
successfully. If you use the word "race" you are basically contributing to
committing character assassination of yourself or will contribute to
self-defeat of the organisational goals you are representing.
Multiculturalism has never been about tolerance. It is an anti-Western hate
ideology championed as an instrument for unilaterally dismantling European
culture. As such, it is an evil ideology bent on an entire culture's
eradication, and we, the peoples of Europe, have not just a right, but a
duty to resist it. The key is preserving our reputational shields using
2.78 US and European nationalist
The ongoing US cultural war is
fundamentally different from the European and the rhetoric clearly reflects
the differences. You cannot and should not mix the European struggle with
the US struggle and therefore should not use similar arguments when
discussing the two struggles.
2.79 Educating the European
patriots who lacks ideological confidence
It is extremely
important that the cultural conservatives/patriots/nationalists in Europe
who are ideologically confident take responsibility and educate/encourage
the nonconfident nationalists.
Approximately 70% of Western European males would
sacrifice their lives to prevent Europe from being conquered by Islam.
2.80 Three-point guide to convert your right wing blog/site
to a newspaper/magazine with national distribution
2.81 The strategy of Western survivalists
If or when the
European Union collapses and multiculturalism is defeated across the Western
world, we need to stage public trials against the creators of Eurabia and
the lies continuously told by our media and academia. They need to be
exposed as evil and politically crushed.
Christianity, pros and cons
The Christian-non-Christian divide is perhaps the most
difficult divide to overcome within the West today. I’m struggling with this
myself. Some of the criticism of Christianity, or at least the way many
Western Christians are behaving now, is legitimate.
Over the past
few centuries, Christianity has stripped itself of its pagan accretions. In
the process, it has become as much a threat to ourselves and our loved ones
as Marxism used to be, if not more so.
2.83 The Church —
part of the problem or part of the solution?
Although not a
religious person myself, I am usually in favor of a revitalisation of
Christianity in Europe. However, I sometimes have my doubts when I see how
many, too many, church leaders consistently end up on the wrong side of
issues related to Islam and Muslim immigration. Christians need to
understand that there can be no peace or understanding with the Islamic
world. They want to subdue us, pure and simple.
shalt hate Christianity and Judaism
As a non-religious
person, but still one that acknowledges and respects the impact of
Judeo-Christian thinking on Western culture, I have warned against naive
Christian compassion related to Muslim immigration, as well as a disturbing
tendency among too many Christian organisations to ally themselves with
Muslims. But the most useful allies Muslims have in the West tend to be
found among the non-religious crowd.
The British Broadcasting Corporation is
dominated by Left-leaning liberals who are anti-American and biased against
Christianity, but sensitive to the feelings of Muslims.
Commandment of multiculturalism is: Thou shalt hate Christianity and
Judaism. Multiculturalists also hate nation states, and they even hate the
Enlightenment, by insisting that non-Western cultures should be above
The philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer was an atheist. Yet
according to him, it was the Christian idea of God that permitted Europeans
to believe that the universe was a rational cosmos.
"Human beings will have their gods
— and modern reason cannot alter this. Can even the most
committed atheist be completely indifferent to the imaginary gods that the
other members of his community continue to worship?"
Dalrymple: "Discipline without freedom leads to misery, but
freedom without discipline leads to chaos, shallowness, and misery of
As long as there is separation between religion and
state, those of us who don't have any religious belief should prefer
religions which tend to create reasonable and prosperous communities. Our
traditional Judeo-Christian religions have proven this capability. Islam
never has, and probably never will.
2.85 A future Christian
identity for Europe?
By Kyle Spotswood
Within Christian political
thought there has been traditionally a distinction, if not a separation, of
the institution of the state and the institution of the church. There are
various Christian political theories which outline how the state and the
church should relate. Christian political thought cannot concede that the
secular realm should be in the hands of a godless ideology. Christianity
transforms the very understanding of politics, for politics is never about
domination, it is about service.
2.86 Conflict avoidance and how
to avoid it
By Brett Stevens
The hardest thing about being a small
hominid is that you run the risk, at any moment, of screwing up and getting
killed. For this reason, most of human history has dealt with conflict
resolution and ways to get people going in different directions to work
together. But over the years, we go from conflict resolution to conflict
avoidance, meaning that we no longer seek working solutions, but to stop the
fighting. We assume the fighting is the source of the disagreement, and not
the other way around.
2.87 Western, modern countries that never
adopted multiculturalism — Japan, South Korea and Taiwan
South Korea's post-World War II forty-year economic growth surge without
immigration has always been an embarrassment to the immigration and
China is a monocultural country, just
like African nations and a majority of countries in the Islamic world. While
a significant number of citizens in Islamic or Muslim countries are directly
hostile to Europeans, Chinese are usually just after your money.
2.88 Democracy not working
Currently, the democratic
system is in my view not working properly in any Western country. It is more
or less dead in Western Europe, where most of the real power has been
transferred to the unelected organs of the European Union. Virtually all
Western countries have lost control over their borders. This is not a
sustainable situation. You can call your political system a democracy, a
dictatorship, a republic, a monarchy or whatever you want, but a country
that does not control its territory will eventually die.
political system must first and foremost ensure the survival, the continued
physical existence, of the community it serves. After that comes ensuring
the prosperity and liberty of this community in the best possible way.
However, when I look at the situation in Western countries today, I cannot
see that democracy always ensures our liberty or prosperity, and in many
cases it functions so poorly that it threatens our very survival.
2.89 The Rape of Europe — emigration of indigenous Europeans?
German author Henryk M. Broder told the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant that
young Europeans who love freedom better emigrate. Europe as we know it will
no longer exist 20 years from now. Broder is convinced that the Europeans
are not willing to oppose Islamisation. As Broder is sixty years old he is
not going to emigrate himself. But he urged young people to get out and
"move to Australia or New Zealand. That is the only option they have if they
want to avoid the plagues that will turn the old continent uninhabitable."
2.90 Suggestions for the future
How should we
respond to the threats our civilisation is facing? First of all, ordinary
citizens should arm themselves immediately since crime and violence is
spreading fast throughout the Western world. Second, we need to reclaim
pride in our heritage, which has been systematically taken away from us in
recent generations, and restore a proper teaching of this in our education
system. We should assume that the mass media and our leaders are not telling
us the full truth about the scale and consequences of Muslim immigration.
2.91 What do we fight for?
I have tried to
contribute to a new vocabulary by coining the word "Caucasophobia" for
anti-white racism, and have suggested the term "self-termination" for
organised Western self-loathing and the Western policy of unilaterally
dismantling our own culture.
We are against Sharia and Jihad, but
what are we for? What is Western civilisation? What exactly sets it apart
from others and makes it worth keeping?
I would personally say that
the emphasis on the individual is our most defining trait as a civilisation.
Both Muslims and internal collectivists hate our individualism the most,
because it stands in the way of their ideologies. This is why they go to
great lengths to smash it and replace it with group thinking. However, even
our individualism can potentially be carried into such extremes that it can
become a problem. Individuals still need to feel part of something greater
and enduring, or society will be left unable to defend itself.
Another Western trait is a non-fatalistic outlook on the world and a belief
in the ability of individuals to affect their own future, combined with
linear thinking versus circular thinking, a high value placed on rationality
versus emotionalism and last, but not least, curiosity — wanting to know how
I still remember the first time I read the Koran. I soon
discovered how intolerant it was, but my first impression was actually not
that it was violent, but that it was remarkably incoherent and difficult to
read. It’s frequently self-contradictory, and Allah is portrayed as an
unpredictable god. The Bible is more structured and with a higher literary
quality than the Koran, even to a non-religious person.
2.92 Who are we, who
are our enemies — the cost of historical amnesia
Jihad, the Islamic so-called Holy War, has been a fact of life in Europe,
Asia, Africa and the Near and Middle East for more than 1300 years ...
2.93 A European Declaration of Independence
the citizens of the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Germany,
Sweden, Denmark, Ireland, Hungary, (fill in the blanks) demand that the
following steps are taken immediately:
We demand that our national
governments should immediately and without delay pull their countries out of
the European Union, which should be dismantled entirely.
that all documents regarding the Euro-Arab Dialogue and the creation of the
Eurabian networks for "Euro-Mediterranean cooperation" between European
countries and Arab countries be published and explained in their full
significance to the general public.
We demand that all financial
support to the Palestinian Authority should cease immediately. It is proven
beyond any doubt that this has in the past been used to finance campaigns of
Jihad terrorism against Jews in Israel and against Christians in territories
under PA control.
We demand that the ideology of multiculturalism
should immediately be removed from all government policies and school
curricula, and that the state should adopt a policy of supporting the
continuation of the cultural heritage and traditions of the indigenous
We demand that all Muslim immigration in whatever form
should be immediately and completely halted, and that our authorities take a
long break from mass immigration in general until such a time when law and
order has been reestablished in our major cities.
If these demands
are not fully implemented, if the European Union isn't dismantled,
multiculturalism isn't rejected and Muslim immigration isn't stopped, we,
the peoples of Europe, will stop paying taxes and take the appropriate
measures to protect our own security and ensure our national survival.
2.94 Conservatives discussing future solutions for Europe
Many moderate cultural conservatives have suggested that banning Sharia will
solve all our problems and force the Muslims to integrate. Unfortunately,
Islam is a lot more resilient than most people can comprehend.
force temporary secularisation on the Muslims but eventually the demands for
more Sharia will resurface. And by then they will be in majority and can
democratically do whatever they want. The only way we can then prevent
Sharia law from being implemented as the only standard will be to suppress
the Muslim majority through military force.
We, the cultural
conservative and anti-fascists of Europe, must do everything possible to
defend democracy and freedom and prevent a fascist dictatorship by seizing
power and enforce a harsh but just democracy. This can only be accomplished
by overthrowing the current Western European multiculturalist regimes by
seizing power through armed resistance and a military coup when the time is
I predict one of the four scenarios for Western Europe:
will reform. This is unlikely.
2. Our countries will become Muslim.
Several mini-Pakistans will be created all over Europe.
4. All Muslims
will be deported.
In scenarios 2-4, civil war will be unavoidable in
2.95 Islamisation of Europe — possible outcomes
By Daniel Pipes
default assumption of most Europeans is that somehow the European-Muslim
relationship will work out. There may be problems today, but in the future
it will be resolved. And yet I can't see the sources of that optimism. If
one looks at Muslims living in Europe one finds retreat rather than
engagement. The children of the immigrants are more hostile toward existing
European civilisation than are the immigrants themselves. On the European
side, one finds increasing worry, concern, fear of the Muslim presence. So
the hope that everyone will get along seems to be not based on reality.
2.96 From the death of multiculturalism
already passed the point of no return for serious conflicts caused by Muslim
immigration. Anything we do now is damage limitation. The most civilised
thing we can do is to implement a policy of containment of the Islamic
world. This includes stopping Muslim immigration, but also making our
Islam isn't the cause of Europe's
weakness but rather a secondary infection. The Islamic threat could have the
effect of saving Europe from herself. Maybe Jihad will trigger a new
Renaissance in the West.
2.97 Europe heading for civil war
possibility of civil strife in the West caused by runaway immigration is no
longer just theoretical. Muslim blogs are calling for violence against the
Jews, the whites and the well-to-do: "We must burn France, as Hamas will
The growth of the Islamic population is explosive.
According to some, one out of three babies born in France is now a Muslim.
Around 70% of French prisoners are Muslims. Hundreds of Muslim ghettos are
already de facto following sharia, not French law. Within 20 years, one
person out of four in France will be Muslim, and almost certainly poor and
angry. The population will change. People with a high level of productivity
will choose exile. People with a low level of productivity will immigrate.
Jews and Christians will leave. Muslims will arrive.
witnessing the last spasms of the Eurabian Union. Western Europe will change
over the coming generation as much as Eastern Europe following the fall of
the Berlin Wall. There will be the downfall and disintegration of an
anti-democratic, bureaucratic superstate, the European Union instead of the
Europe may not be finished yet, but she will go through
a painful period of transition.
The population movements we are
witnessing now are the largest and fastest in human history. In Europe, they
can only be compared to the period often referred to as the Migration Period
following the disintegration of the Roman Empire.
There are several
Europe will cease
to be a Western, democratic continent, and will become an appendix to the
Arab world. Eurabia will become a global center for Jihad activities, as the
dhimmi taxpayers and infidel Western technology give a boost to the Ummah.
In the event of war, there will be mutual
ethnic cleansing and Muslims will seize parts of Western Europe. Many of our
cultural treasures will burn. Perhaps this new Pakistan in the heart of
Europe will be the source of constant instability and the staging ground for
Jihad incursions into infidel areas.
Europe could become a major
battlefield in an Islamic or Multicultural world war. A world war is already
simmering, with Muslims clashes against Russia, Europe, Israel, China,
India, the USA and Southeast Asia. Once the fighting starts in Europe, it
could spread outside the continent and ignite a world war.
Western Rebirth in Europe
Perhaps the Islamic threat will force
the West to rethink its values and regain its strength. Europe could repel
Islam. Europe will go through a turbulent period of revival and emerge
2.98 Are all European men weak minded cowards or are they just
Vladimir Putin: "Western Europe is heading in a
direction where they are going to become colonies of their former colonies."
Europe is heading towards cultural and demographical suicide due to the
absence of nationalistic doctrines. Nationalism is the antithesis of
multiculturalism/internationalism. In order for nationalism to succeed,
multiculturalism must be deconstructed and vice versa.
concerned about what effects Islam will have on their societies in the
future. We are slowly realising how our own elites have betrayed us and
continue to do so. We are learning that they are systematically selling the
European peoples into Muslim slavery as they continue to allow ongoing
2.99 The self-defeat of the United States By Fjordman
Caroline Glick on surviving in a post-American world:
Like it or
not, the United States of America is no longer the world's policeman. The
USA currently looks more like a defeated nation than the world's sole
remaining superpower. Americans will soon have their hands full with
problems of their own and will be in no position to assist anyone.
2.100 Continued discussion on US-European relations
European vitality has been suppressed under the American hegemony. European
conservatism is totally unacceptable under the current world order. As long
as America has troops in Germany, there is no choice for Europe about whom
to rely on. America has shouldered the legacy of the British empire as the
Both Americans and Europeans have a lot to learn about
their real roots and identity. America and Europe should not be seen as two
separate and opposing entities but two things in symbiosis. America is
indeed the empire of the Enlightenment. A leftist empire will always be in
denial about being an empire at all, as America evidently is.
tipping point will come when living with Muslims becomes more trouble than
living without Muslims. You can bet the farm that this point will be
reached. Islam assures this outcome and there is very little that Muslim
nations can do to avert it. They have neither the strategic resources nor
sufficiently developed military doctrine to prevail over an aroused and
2.101 Preserve or replace the European monarchies?
2.102 Not a war between capitalism and socialism but a cultural war
between nationalism and internationalism
2.103 Democracy needs a Reformation
Why should a welfare bum have the same one vote that a taxpayer has? Why
should a drug pusher have the same one vote as a Mother Theresa? Why should
a school dropout have the same one vote as a college professor?
2.104 Future deportations of Muslims from Europe
2.105 Change of investment/education mentality in the coming decades
2.106 The ideological
journey — from indoctrinated multiculturalist zealot to conservative
When I first started on this compendium more
than three years ago, I decided to cover only issues relating to
Islamisation and mass-Muslim immigration out of fear of being labeled as a
Our present situation is a direct result of WW2 and the cold
war, of the so called Frankfurt school and the rise of cultural
Marxism/multiculturalism and political correctness.
If I had met
myself 12 years ago I would probably think I was an extreme and paranoid
2.107 Further studies
A Declaration of Pre-emptive War
(page 766 of 1518)
Book 3 describes a hypothetical response to a perceived threat (so
called cultural Marxist/multiculturalist atrocities and the threat of
Islamisation). As such, it is a fictional description regarding how it could
be like if Islam would be dominant in Europe. The concept of the story/plot
is based on what it would be like if certain
Christian/conservative/nationalist resistance groups/individuals chose to
oppose these perceived threats and enemies.
3.1 A phase
of dialogue has come to an end (1955-1999)
European Declaration of Independence
By Fjordman, March 2007
We, the citizens of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the
Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Spain,
Portugal, Italy, Greece, Switzerland, Austria, Iceland, Malta and Ireland
demand that the following steps are taken immediately:
We demand that
our national governments should immediately and without delay pull their
countries out of the European Union, which should be dismantled entirely.
European citizens pay up to half of their salaries in direct or indirect
taxes to their nation states. If these nations do not control their own
borders nor their policies, and they don't as long as the EU exists, those
taxes are a scam. National taxes require national borders. If our national
borders are not enforced, we have no obligation whatsoever to pay national
We demand that all documents regarding the Euro-Arab Dialogue
and the creation of the Eurabian networks for "Euro-Mediterranean
cooperation" between European countries and Arab countries since the 1970s,
as documented by Bat Ye'or's work on Eurabia, are published and explained in
their full significance to the general public. Those chiefly responsible for
this — one of the greatest betrayals in the history of Western civilisation
— should stand trial, followed by a period of general de-Eurabification of
our laws and regulations.
We demand that all financial support to the
Palestinian Authority should cease immediately. It is proven beyond any
doubt that this has in the past been used to finance campaigns of Jihad
terrorism against Jews in Israel and against Christians in territories under
PA control. A public statement in support of Israel against Muslim
aggression should be issued, and the money that has previously been awarded
to Palestinians should be allocated partly to Israel's defence, partly to
establish a Global Infidel Defence Fund with the stated goal of
disseminating information about Muslim persecution of non-Muslims worldwide.
We demand that the ideology of multiculturalism should immediately be
removed from all government policies and school curricula, and that the
state should adopt a policy of supporting the continuation of the cultural
heritage and traditions of the indigenous populations. Multiculturalism has
never been about tolerance. It is an anti-Western hate ideology championed
as an instrument for unilaterally dismantling European culture. As such, it
is an evil ideology bent on an entire culture's eradication, and we, the
peoples of Europe, have not just a right, but a duty to resist it and an
obligation to pass on our heritage to future generations.
that all Muslim immigration in whatever form should be immediately and
completely halted ...
Charges against all cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites of Europe
(category A and B traitors)
A person who planned, instigated,
ordered, committed or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning,
preparation or execution of a crime referred to in the following articles
shall be held individually responsible for the crime.
position of any accused person, whether as head of state or government or as
a responsible government official, shall not relieve such person of criminal
responsibility or mitigate punishment.
The charges ...
3.3 The European resistance movement/Indigenous rights movement
PCCTS, Knights Templar offer a full pardon to the Western European
multiculturalist regimes, the MA 100 alliance (political parties) and all
category A and B individual traitors if they capitulate to our military
forces by January 1, 2020.
We, the National Resistance Movements of
Western Europe, are hereby giving you the chance to exonerate yourselves if
the following demands are met.
3.4 Why armed resistance against the cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe is the only rational
Multiculturalism is an insidious weapon. All ties
to family, community, and one's people as a whole are destroyed. The
antithesis of multiculturalism is moral, religious, and cultural solidarity
among the people of a nation. A necessary first step toward recovery is to
look at politics, social policy, and government emanating from Brussels with
new eyes ...
1. We are subject
to cultural Marxist/multiculturalist institutionalised ideological coercion
and brainwashing through government institutions.
2. More or less
every media organisation is propagating cultural Marxist/multiculturalist
principles. There is no freedom of speech in Europe.
3. The cultural
Marxists/multiculturalists systematically import millions of voters, which
increases their political position from year to year.
4. Right wing
political parties fight an uphill battle. Cultural conservatives should
initiate armed resistance against the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist
3.5 A new era has come — the time for dialogue is now over
The cultural Marxists have for more than 50 years disregarded the will
of the majority of Europeans. The time for dialogue is now over. The time
for armed resistance has come.
The most basic human right is to
defend oneself against deliberate cultural attacks or even an
institutionalised cultural genocide of unprecedented historical proportions.
It is not just a right but a duty for all Europeans to defend oneself
against such atrocities through armed struggle. We call upon you, fellow
Europeans. Stop complaining and instead fight by our side.
patriotic Europeans, will continue to effectively revolt against the Nazis
of our time: the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites, who are leading
us to the cultural slaughterhouse by selling us into Muslim slavery. We have
lost the democratical struggle to defend Europe from deliberate cultural
annihilation. As more people realise this we will see an increasing number
of Europeans joining our ranks to fight by our side. Armed struggle is the
only rational approach.
We, the free indigenous peoples of Europe,
hereby declare a pre-emptive war on all cultural Marxist/multiculturalist
elites of Western Europe. And we have a very clear message for you:
We know who you are, where you live and we are coming for you. If not today,
then tomorrow, if not in 10 years, then in 50 years. We are in the process
of flagging every single multiculturalist traitor in Western Europe. You
will be punished for your treasonous acts against Europe, and Europeans. We
will ensure that all category A and B traitors, the enablers of Islamisation
and the destroyers of our cultures, nations and societies, will be executed
and your property expropriated.
It will take us up to 70 years to
win, but there is no doubt in our minds that we will eventually succeed.
Quite ironically, the ongoing Islamisation that you so actively facilitate
will be your downfall. Soon enough, the desperate cries of the European
masses will indicate that your Multiculturalist regimes are near their end.
The Western European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes will fall
before 2083, of that you can be certain.
3.6 Explanation of the European civil war — phases 1, 2 and 3
Phase of dialogue (1955-1999) ...
3.7 There are four potential outcomes of phases 2 and 3
1. Creation of mini-Pakistans within Europe. This must be stopped at all
2. Reformation of Islam. This scenario is very unlikely.
Coup. This scenario is the preferred outcome.
4. Civil war
3.8 Differentiating between and dealing with category A, B and C
One of the foundational problems in Europe today is
that the multiculturalists and the suicidal humanists lie to everyone to
preserve comfortable illusions. Political correctness is a mandatory lie in
The multiculturalists have traditionally cheered
the most violent totalitarian movements in other parts of the world as
"freedom fighters" ...
3.9 Demands/requests/pleas to our national military commands
Introduction — The European national military commands and the
Islamisation of Europe
3.10 Assimilation policy/demands/offer for Muslim individuals living
(this offer will expire on January 1, 2020)
following assimilation policy is to be accepted by all Muslims who currently
live on European soil and want to continue to live in Europe.
Convert to Christianity
2. Name change
3. No mother tongue or Arabic
4. All mosques and Islamic centers will be demolished or converted
A European military order re-emerges — in praise of the new
3.11 The history of Pauperes commilitones Christi Templique
The Knights Templar
organisation was founded in 1119 by knights sworn to protect Christian
pilgrims visiting the Holy Land after the crusaders recaptured Jerusalem
from the Muslims in 1099.
3.12 Re-founding of Pauperes commilitones Christi Templique
(PCCTS, the Knights Templar)
3.13 Founding principles of the Order/Tribunal
3.23 The cruel nature of our operations
As a Justiciar Knight
you are operating as a jury, judge and executioner on behalf of all free
Europeans. Never forget that it is not only your right to act against the
tyranny of the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites of Europe, it is
your duty to do so. There are situations in which cruelty is necessary, and
refusing to apply necessary cruelty is a betrayal of the people whom you
wish to protect.
3.29 How to stay motivated for longer periods — perform a daily
Being a Justiciar Knight is not for everyone. You are
normally required to plan absolutely everything alone. Fight alone to see
your mission through and you are likely to die alone with half of your
city's system protectors hunting you. However, I have never in my life felt
that I have done anything more meaningful than what I am doing now.
3.38 Services offered by European criminal syndicates/networks
All criminal groups are prepared to resort to violence when necessary to
commit robberies, enforce protection rackets or secure drug deals. Firearms,
which are seen as a tool and a statement of intent, are a priority.
3.39 Sending announcements before an operation
You will need
access to a computer with internet connection to use as propaganda outlets
before your operation.
Avoiding apprehension/arrest and death
If you are unwilling to martyr
yourself for the cause, then the PCCTS, Knights Templar is not for you.
3.48 Quick summary — overview of the planning and operational phases
for your mission
3.54 Sabotage operations — the most efficient ways to cripple the
current Western European multiculturalist regimes
start discussing strategies for sabotage, we have to agree on the
foundational premise for the valuation of sabotage over shock attacks.
The common factor for both types of operations (shock or sabotage) is
that we must keep civilian casualties at an absolute minimum.
3.61 After a successful operation
— countering the misinformation campaign from the multiculturalist
The Japanese and South Korean societies and to a certain
degree the Taiwanese model contain a majority of all the political
principles we seek to restore. They represent many of the European classical
conservative principles with modern twists. Japan, South Korea and Taiwan
are today the most peaceful societies due to their monocultural model.
We view the current regimes of Western Europe as totalitarian Nazi
regimes. We condemn imperialistic thought and we condemn genocide and
violence in general. We have no territorial claims that will violate any
sovereign European or other civilised country, the exception being our
Middle Eastern foreign policy plan. This involves a Crusade. Hindus and
Buddhists are considered brothers in our common fight against Jihadi
imperialism, atrocities and genocides.
3.62 Grand Master Overseer
— the overseer organisation
3.63 Why bother with honouring fallen
martyrs and living heroes of our struggle?
It is essential and
extremely important to honour living heroes of our struggle and to ensure
that fallen martyrs are commemorated.
3.64 Knights Templar
orders, commendations, uniform, title, tombstone and relevant information
3.72 The PCCTS, Knights Templar Oath — Ordination Rite
The purpose of
the rite is to create and formalise your commitment to the cause of the
PCCTS, Knights Templar. You are also literally making a blood pact with your
ancestors, with past martyrs, and with God. You are offering them a central
part of your very being in exchange for the gift of immortality and a place
in the eternal kingdom. You pledge allegiance to the principles of the
PCCTS, Knights Templar, to fellow Justiciar Knights, to your people, the
wishes of your ancestors and to God. Your oath will commit you to act
selflessly as you offer them devoted service to the death.
Future compensation arrangements for European members of the resistance
The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight,
nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable
creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the
exertions of better men than himself. If there are absolutely no incentives
to do the right thing how can we expect enough individuals to sacrifice
themselves for the greater good?
3.74 Right of revolution
U.S. Declaration of Independence
We hold these Truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty
and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights,
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the
consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive of these Ends, it is in the Right of the People to alter or
abolish it, and to institute a new Government, laying its Foundation on such
Principles, and organising its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem
most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.
Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right of "the
people" to bear arms as part of a well regulated militia. If the people have
a right to overthrow a despotic government then they have a right to possess
the practical means to do so.
The Founding Fathers gave Americans
the Second Amendment not to protect them from criminals, but to allow them
to rebel against their government should it be necessary. George Washington
supported the stance that armed revolts every so often were necessary to
keep the government from stagnation, corruption, or deterioration.
3.75 Non-violent resistance — civil disobedience/economic sabotage
Every patriotic European has a duty to contribute to the fall of the
current cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regime through any and all means
3.76 National intelligence agencies
request to the police forces (system protectors) of Western Europe
More than 60% of the police officers in Europe sympathise with our cause and
around 90% empathise with it. Our cause is to strike the enablers that are
currently facilitating the Islamic colonization of our countries.
3.78 Young Europeans (YE) movement
3.79 Various info
European political solutions for the future
3.80 Reforming the European Church
A majority of Protestants, me
included, have lost all respect for the Protestant church. An increasing
number of European Protestants are converting to Catholicism.
3.81 The future of European Christendom
Embracing Christendom will be
voluntary. People who chose to be atheists will enjoy the same rights. The
school curriculum and government policies will propagate cultural
We cannot have a Vatican that trembles at the
feet of the Islamic Ummah or a Vatican that facilitates its own destruction
without a fight. We must therefore rid the Vatican of corrupt and even
suicidal members and ensure that we have Church leaders who believe in a
sustainable and confident European Christendom. We need a Christendom that
believes in the fundamental concept of self-defense and that has the will
and ambition to survive. We need Christian leaders who are willing to call
for defensive Crusades if any of our Christian brothers are threatened by
Jihad in the future.
The Church and church leaders will not be
allowed to influence non-cultural political matters in any way. This
includes science, research and development, and all non-cultural areas which
will benefit Europe in the future.
3.82 Patriarchy will be
The return of the patriarchy
By Phillip Longman
For more than a generation now, well-fed, healthy, peaceful populations
around the world have been producing too few children to avoid population
decline. That is true even though dramatic improvements in infant and child
mortality mean that far fewer children are needed today (only about 2.1 per
woman in modern societies) to avoid population loss. Birthrates are falling
far below replacement levels in one country after the next.
Patriarchy does not simply mean that men rule. Indeed, it is a particular
value system that not only requires men to marry but to marry a woman of
proper station. It competes with many other male visions of the good life,
and for that reason alone is prone to come in cycles. Yet before it
degenerates, it is a cultural regime that serves to keep birthrates high
among the affluent, while also maximizing parents' investments in their
children. No advanced civilization has yet learned how to endure without it.
Falling fertility is responsible for many financial and economic
problems that dominate today's headlines. The long-term financing of social
security schemes, private pension plans, and healthcare systems has little
to do with people living longer. Gains in life expectancy at older ages have
actually been quite modest, and the rate of improvement in the United States
has diminished for each of the last three decades. Instead, the falling
ratio of workers to retirees is overwhelmingly caused by workers who were
never born. As governments raise taxes on a dwindling working-age population
to cover the growing burdens of supporting the elderly, young couples may
conclude they are even less able to afford children than their parents were,
thereby setting off a new cycle of population aging and decline.
These circumstances are leading to the emergence of a new society whose
members will disproportionately be descended from parents who rejected the
social tendencies that once made childlessness and small families the norm.
These values include an adherence to traditional, patriarchal religion, and
a strong identification with one's own folk or nation.
societies come in many varieties and evolve through different stages. What
they have in common are customs and attitudes that collectively serve to
maximize fertility and parental investment in the next generation. Of these,
among the most important is the stigmatization of "illegitimate" children.
Under patriarchy, "bastards" and single mothers cannot be tolerated because
they undermine male investment in the next generation. Illegitimate children
do not take their fathers' name, and so their fathers, even if known, tend
not to take any responsibility for them. By contrast, "legitimate" children
become a source of either honour or shame to their fathers and the family
line. Patriarchy also leads men to keep having children until they produce
at least one son.
A society organized on such principles may well
degenerate over time into misogyny, and eventually sterility, as occurred in
both ancient Greece and Rome. In more recent times, the patriarchal family
has also proved vulnerable to the rise of capitalism, which profits from the
diversion of female labour from the house to the workplace. But as long as
the patriarchal system avoids succumbing to these threats, it will produce a
greater quantity of children, and arguably children of higher quality, than
do societies organized by other principles.
Today we associate
patriarchy with the hideous abuse of women and children, with poverty and
failed states. Yet these are examples of insecure societies that have
degenerated into male tyrannies. Under a true patriarchal system, fathers
have strong reason to take an active interest in the children their wives
bear. That is because, when men come to see themselves, and are seen by
others, as upholders of a patriarchal line, how those children turn out
directly affects their own rank and honour. Under patriarchy, maternal
investment in children also increases, with more children receiving more
attention from their mothers, who have few other ways of finding meaning in
their lives. A society that presents women with essentially three options — be a nun, be a prostitute, or marry a man and bear children
— has stumbled
upon a highly effective way to reduce the risk of demographic decline.
Patriarchy may have its privileges, but they may pale in comparison to
the joys of bachelorhood in a luxurious society. Women also have reason to
grow weary of patriarchy, particularly when men no longer uphold their
The great difference in fertility rates between
secular individualists and religious or cultural conservatives augurs a
vast, demographically driven change in modern societies. History is full of
revolts of children against parents.
Advanced societies are growing
more patriarchal, whether they like it or not. In addition to the greater
fertility of conservative segments of society, the rollback of the welfare
state forced by population aging and decline will give these elements an
additional survival advantage, and therefore spur even higher fertility. As
governments hand back functions they once appropriated from the family,
notably support in old age, people will find that they need more children to
insure their golden years, and they will seek to bind their children to them
through inculcating traditional religious values akin to the Bible's
injunction to honour thy mother and father.
Societies that are today
the most secular and the most generous with their underfunded welfare states
will be the most prone to religious revivals and a rebirth of the
patriarchal family. The absolute population of Europe and Japan may fall
dramatically, but the remaining population will be adapted to a new
environment in which no one can rely on government to replace the family.
3.83 Re-creating the traditional patriarchal social structures
When we, the cultural conservatives, seize political and military
control of Western European countries, we will re-establish patriarchal
structures. Doing so will ensure the survival of the nuclear family.
Prior to the 1960s, abstinence from premarital sex was considered the
official standard for men and women. But a double standard, whereby sexual
intercourse before marriage is permissible for males but not for females,
was widely practiced. In the 1960s, young people rejected the double
standard and set more egalitarian standards.
With increasing emphasis
on egalitarian gender-role conditioning, many men are moving away from the
stereotypical sexual aggressor attitudes of the traditional male and are
looking for the expressive qualities of mutual love and caring in their
sexual relationships. Similarly, women look for equality in their sexual
relationships where they are active participants rather than passive
objects. In traditional relationships, men had autonomy and authority while
women had neither. Women were expected to be submissive and subservient,
without the right to their own opinions, feelings or needs. In modern
relationships based on equality of gender roles, female and male autonomy
are of equal importance, and intimacy, the mutual sharing of the being of
each partner, is of vital importance to the continual development and
deepening of mutual trust and love.
3.84 Knights Templar and ethnocentrism
Templar has three primary functions:
1. To act as a pan-European Crusader
2. To act as an Indigenous Rights Movement
3. To act as a War
The Nordic theory is the ideology of racial
superiority which claims that the Nordic race constitute a master race
because of an innate capacity for initiative, long term planning and
leadership. The reasoning for this theory is that the Nordic peoples has
been forced to, due to the cold arctic climate, to logistically plan ahead
for up to 6 months per year to be able to survive the cold winters. The weak
elements of the tribe perished, leaving only the strong and intelligent. It
is claimed that the descendants are superior when it comes to initiative,
long term planning and intelligence compared to people who live in warm
Nordicism came to be a major influence on Nazism.
Multiculturalism is a reactionary ideology to Nordicism. The Nordics inhabit
the countries around the North and Baltic Seas, and include not only the
great Scandinavian and Teutonic groups, but also other representatives of
Aryan language and culture.
The Nordic tribes and the rest of the
European tribes are on a course to extinction because of multiculturalist
facilitation of Islamic demographic warfare.
Don't let the
multiculturalists define what racism is or isn’t. Keeping an African against
his will in your basement as a slave is racism. Loving your extended
family/your ethnic group and fighting for ethnic and/or indigenous rights
does not make you a racist.
I don't see why we shouldn't actively
strive for the establishment of a Nordic League propagating Nordic
interests, following the design of the Arab League.
I have for a long
time dreaded the thought of writing an essay about this subject. It is
considered politically incorrect by even many of the most dedicated
conservatives and it is considered an efficient way to commit character
suicide for individuals who have ambitions to appeal to the bulk of the
masses in this early stage of the European civil war.
figure that openly opposes race-mixing or interracial relations and instead
propagate the preservation of his tribe is aggressively persecuted,
ridiculed and/or ignored by the European multiculturalist regimes.
The cultural establishment, spearheaded by the entertainment industry and
the MSM, are doing everything they can to glorify and propagate race-mixing
by creating movies, series and other coverage which illustrate happy
interracial couples. Very few people are buying into this.
overwhelming number of ethnic groups consider racial/ethnic purity to be the
very center of their cultural identity. Those familiar with Taiwanese, South
Korean, and Japanese culture can attest to that. Arab countries are very
concerned with racial/ethnic purity. This is so evident that non-Arab
Muslims are considered second-class Muslims.
To prevent the
extinction of the Nordic tribes, the key is to liberalise biotechnology laws
and to commercialise and promote reprogenetics while there is still a
sustainable selection of Nordics of 99% purity left. Not only will we have
the option to secure our survival but we will be able to purify our tribe
and add several IQ points to our offspring in the process.
immigration, race mixing, and adoption of non-Europeans harm the unity of
our tribe. Corruption and crime are natural results of a lack of social
cohesion. When you add Islam to the mix, the worst-case scenario is changed
from a dysfunctional country to total defeat.
A stable and prosperous
country that can offer its citizens solid welfare depends on:
1. No Islam
2. An ethnic homogenous people
3. An educated people with a high average
4. Cultural conservative policies
5. A free market
is one historical figure and past Germanic leader I hate, it is Adolf
Hitler. Multiculturalism would have never been implemented in Europe if it
hadn't been for NSDAP's reckless and unforgivable actions. Europe would have
beautiful cultural conservative policies — very similar to the ones you now
find in Japan and South Korea. Hitler almost destroyed everything with his
reckless and unforgivable actions and he will forever be known as a traitor
to the Nordic-Germanic tribes.
PCCTS, Knights Templar message
to all minority groups and mixed individuals
Know that we,
the PCCTS, Knights Templar, are not a racist organisation. Individuals of
all races, providing that they are Christian, can join and fight for the
Knights Templar as Justiciar Knights. Your contribution for the conservative
cause will guarantee you and the loyal members of your family permanent
residency in Europe. You will be embraced as a fellow citizen if you shed
blood with us.
All members of minority groups will over the next few
years have to make a choice. I just hope they make the right one. Their
future in Europe will rely on it.
3.85 The political significance of sex in a cultural-conservative
Sex is probably the most powerful and under analyzed
motivator for man on earth. So how do we preach chastity to a mob who wants
unlimited access to free sex? The answer is that we offer any and all
liberals the freedom of unlimited sex in a future scenario. We must present
concepts that are credible. This does not mean that our future societies
will end up as anarchies. But we present concepts of chastity and chivalry
at the same time.
The solution is to set up liberal zones segregated
from the rest of the society. These liberal zones must be cut off from the
rest of society to avoid cultural contamination. This should be a compromise
we can live with.
If we fail to compromise and instead try to ram a
puritan and deeply conservative way of life down everyone's throat we will
only defeat ourselves. Using the sexual revolution to our advantage will
contribute to our success.
3.86 Sexual ethics/sexual morality in Western Europe has been
destroyed by cultural Marxism and liberalism
(also referred to as sexual morality) refers to those aspects of ethics that
deal with issues arising from all aspects of sexuality and human sexual
behaviour. Broadly speaking, sexual ethics relates to community and personal
standards relating to the conduct of interpersonal relationships.
Ethical dilemmas involving sex can appear in situations where there is a
significant power difference or where there is a pre-existing professional
relationship between the participants, or where consent is partial or
The degree of breakdown in sexual ethics or sexual
morality is manifested through young women's susceptibility to having
one-night stands and pre-marital sex and the average number of sexual
partners per woman during her lifetime. New-generation girls have a
substantially less conservative view than older girls.
transmitted diseases ruin people's lives. I can only imagine how many people
are suffering from STDs as a result of the current lack of sexual morals.
This mentality is clearly not sustainable. European civilisation will not
survive if we continue to allow the breakdown of sexual morals.
3.87 Sexually transmitted disease (STD) epidemic in Western Europe
The magnitude of the STD epidemics is a direct cause of the breakdown in
sexual ethics in Western Europe and is also related to liberal third-world
Few comprehensive data exist on the costs associated
with sexually transmitted infections. But the economic burden imposed by
these infections is extremely high, and an increasing proportion of the
costs is being borne by public sources of payment. Costs related to STDs
will have a devastating impact on Western European countries in the future
unless we, the cultural conservatives, manage to seize political and
military control and drastically reverse the ongoing cultural suicide of
3.88 Various topics relating to social structures
A new mentality, anti-promiscuousity (ROUGH DRAFT)
An anti-promiscuousity mentality should be included in a future secular
social reform agenda. Excessive sexuality is a kind of addiction. Excessive
promiscuousity is the cause of many of the problems in our society.
Promiscuousity should be demonised by the media.
Lookism is discrimination against or prejudice towards
others based on their appearance. Lookism has received scholarly attention
both from a cultural studies and an economics perspective.
Erotic capital (ROUGH DRAFT)
Erotic capital is power
possessed by an individual as a result of his or her sexual attractiveness
to others. It is one among other species of capital, including social
capital, symbolic capital, and cultural capital.
3.89 Anti-feminist policies — Reviving the patriarchal model by
deconstructing the Western European matriarchal systems
many sensible feminist policies. Ignore these sensible feminist policies,
and instead focus on the destructive policies. Fact: 60-70% of all cultural
Marxists/multiculturalists are women. The primary trait and value that a
majority of women propagate is compassion.
Our current system
produces broken families and prevents traditional norms based on discipline.
The most direct threat to the family is divorce on demand. Sooner or later,
if Western Europe is to endure, it must be brought under control. The
father/patriarch must be given considerably more influence. The matriarchal
supremacy within the modern households must cease to exist.
Preventing the European population decline — securing sustainability —
future national reproduction policies
Western European cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist elites are arguing that we need immigration to
compensate for our population decline and the dangerously low birth rates of
European women. However, they fail to admit and acknowledge that they
themselves, and their policies, are the reason for the decline. And they are
reluctant to implement effective measures to increase the low fertility
Giving women more incentives to have children in the form of
various welfare incentives, tax deductions, various incentives aimed at the
nuclear family and similar incentives will not increase the fertility rate
Creating surrogacy facilities in low-cost countries and
state funded boarding homes domestically can only be applied in a society
that isn’t bound by the paralyzing grasp of today’s cultural Marxist
The national goal must be to beat the currently leading
oriental children (Chinese, South Korean, Japanese, and Taiwanese) in every
scholastic measurement and thus achieve a system of excellence that is
superior to all known systems.
The development of advanced incubator
machines/artificial wombs could become an alternative (or even a substitute)
to using surrogates in low-cost countries. This can be done by investing in
and developing advanced neonatal intensive-care units or by developing
3.91 Future democracy model and monoculturalism
The current mass-democracy model in Western Europe has paved the way for
our current problems. Mass democracy has allowed cultural Marxism to hijack
society’s political structures, initially through schools, universities and
The re-introduction of monoculturalism will be based on
practical issues and circumstances related to social cohesion and not on
hate. This reintroduction of monoculturalism will resemble that of today's
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.
3.92 The rapid extinction of the
It is estimated that the Nordic genotypes will be
extinct within 200 years. This is mainly due to intermarriage between
Nordics and non-Nordics. There are only three ways to prevent this. One
solution will be by introducing negative eugenics programs combined with
ethnic segregation. We must reject negative eugenics and focus on positive
eugenics or reprogenetics.
3.93 Reprogenetics and the future
Reprogenetics is a term referring to the merging of reproductive and
genetic technologies expected to happen in the near future as techniques
like germinal choice technology become more available and more powerful. The
term was coined by Lee M. Silver, a professor of molecular biology at
Princeton University, in his 1997 book Remaking Eden.
differences between reprogenetics and eugenics is that most eugenics
programs were compulsory programs imposed upon citizens by governments
trying to enact an ultimate goal. Reprogenetics, by contrast, would be
pursued by individual parents, who would be trying to improve their children
with the same motivations that compel them to purchase expensive education.
A World Bank of Genotypes must be considered a solidarity project, a
peace project, whose goal is to prevent conflict. Anyone can choose any
genotype they want from it. This project has the potential to end many
conflicts once and for all, especially those related to ethnocentrism. Only
the first world would be able to afford it at first.
3.94 Future economical model/public sector model/welfare program/economic
The ongoing European civil war is a cultural war
between cultural conservatives and cultural Marxists (nationalism vs.
internationalism). The fact that globalist capitalism is a destructive
concept does not mean that localised capitalist mechanics are. There must
always be potent incentives for individuals who create work places. A
socialist or even a planned economy must be avoided at all costs.
is unrealistic to think that there will be complete economic equality in
nations with free markets. We should attempt to ensure a solid welfare
program for all European citizens. Maintaining a sustainable solid welfare
system depends on hard working individuals and social cohesion, i.e. a
monocultural society. Welfare expenditure should not take precedence over
the 20% fixed sum dedicated to science, technology, research and
3.95 Future Western European educational systems
All primary, secondary and high schools should be gender segregated.
Gender segregation should also be considered for colleges and universities.
Whenever the distraction of boys is taken away from girls or vice versa,
students no longer have to worry about how they dress, who they have to
impress or who their friends are. Instead, they are able to concentrate more
on academics. Also, in single sex classrooms teachers can focus on the
environment in which the particular gender learns better.
single-sex school trend is seen in other countries. Single-sex public
schools are producing higher grades and test scores than co-educational
schools. Separating the sexes has positive, long-term impacts that
universities around Europe should consider.
Focus on excellence
instead of mediocrity.
3.96 Alternative energy,
scientific/technological evolution, overconsumption/pollution/overpopulation
Aim for oil independence. This will not only save the environment, it
will completely devastate many Muslim countries economically.
never-ending collective pursuit for scientific evolution and perfection
should become the benchmark and essence of our existence instead of
glorifying personal acquisition of wealth and physical beauty.
should develop a brain-computer interface (BCI) that provides a direct path
of communication from an external device to the brain. The goal should be to
create an alternative to educational institutions.
We should legalise
reproductive technologies that will allow parents to create off spring with
biological improvement (reprogenetics). This must be a non-coercive form of
biological improvement which will be predominantly motivated by individual
competitiveness and the desire to create the best opportunities for
Overconsumption, pollution and overpopulation are the three
problems that threaten the future of life on Earth. The three problems
intersect and are interactive, but they are also separate and distinct.
What population size can our planet support? The carrying capacity is
the number of individuals an environment can support without significant
negative impacts to the given organism and its environment.
European cultural Marxist/multiculturalist/suicidal humanist/capitalist
globalist elite created Articles 12 and 16 of the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights: "It is the right of every woman/couple to reproduce and have
as many children as they want ..."
There is no general consensus to the
carrying capacity of the planet. Our planet should not exceed 3 billion
individuals, so radical policies will have to be implemented. The primary
principle must be quality over quantity.
3.97 Future aid policy —
Africa — The foreign cultural Marxist aid establishment and the harm it
inflicts on Africa
Foreign aid has harmed Africa and should be phased
out. Trillions of USD have been channelled to Africa over the last 50 years
with absolutely no positive results for the continent. Aid prevents the
establishment of sustainable functioning societies. The more aid a country
receives, the more it plunges into poverty and corruption.
Future crime prevention, EF anthem, Independence Day, imperialism
Crime will not be tolerated in a future cultural conservative Europe.
Military campaigns will be launched with full force to break and obliterate
the Albanian and Rom criminal networks (and other large European criminal
The new and powerful cultural conservative European
Federation should have a new anthem.
European Independence Day
should be celebrated on September 11 or 12, marking the successful
defence of Western Europe by the Holy League. The Battle of Vienna in 1683
should be celebrated as the Independence Day for all Western Europeans.
A future European Federation (consisting of Europe and Russia) will have
all the territory/resources we will ever need to satisfy our future demands.
We must not and should never attack another sovereign country. Driving out
Islam from Christian lands is a defensive strategy designed to reverse
decades of corrupt and suicidal European leadership. Our territorial claims
(on behalf of the rightful owners) are limited to eastern and western
Anatolia and the areas north and south of Israel for the benefit of Israelis
and Christian minorities.
3.99 The destructive forces of the
diversity/ethnic industries, comments and solutions
This is the
continuation of section 2.62.
The hip-hop movement glorifies
destructive role models propagating:
1. Anti-social and antiauthority
2. Drug use, primarily hashish and marijuana
attitudes through the graffiti movement
4. Violence and gang mentality
Undermine positive norms
What makes young Europeans so susceptible to
the hiphop mentality:
1. Big business, globalist companies
2. A social
and political environment lacking nationalistic principles
3. Breakdown of
the nuclear family and traditional family values
4. Media companies with
absolute power to sell lifestyles
5. Lack of cultural pride resulting in
lack of individual pride
3.100 Solutions for South Africa, Israel
and the USA
Supremacist ethnocentrism is an evil. However, we must
keep an open mind when we evaluate these issues. We cannot allow political
correctness paralyze the debate.
1. The European Afrikaner/Boer
genocide in South Africa The systematic genocide of Europeans in South
Africa is usually referred to as the Afrikaner genocide. Nelson Mandela used
to be a terrorist leader and gave personal orders to execute a bombing
attack against the old apartheid regime. This is the reason why he was
arrested in the first place.
2. The Israeli security fence and other
security barriers Israel's security fence has cut terrorism incidents by
more than 90% since its completion. The physical separation (apartheid) of
the Israelis and the Muslims works as intended.
3. The demographic
annihilation of the European population in the USA due to Asian, Mexican and
African mass immigration
3.101 The cultural Marxist
war against God and the Church in Western Europe
AND NOT EDITED)
The greatest achievement in humanity was the moon
landing, achieved by our European-American brethren. Since then, cultural
Marxism has risen, infiltrated and ravaged both Western Europe and the USA.
The mass-democracy model of Western Europe has become the norm in the
Western world, which has cultivated the principle of mediocrity instead of
continuing to pursue excellence. Europe is now a third-world country in
regard to spirituality and civilizational goals.
3.102 USA — a
dying European empire — the objectives of the conservative revolutionary
(UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND NOT EDITED)
initially succeeded because European Christian cultures are compatible. But
to assume that millions and Asian and African immigrants, in addition to
existing non-European minorities, can be assimilated with this homogenous
European Christian culture is a mistake of civilizational proportions. The
only thing that can solve problems of this magnitude is a coup d'état
initiated by conservatives. The outcome will be a re-establishment of the
USA as a European Christian country.
There are 3 primary reasons for
the imminent fall of the USA:
1. Fatally declining social cohesion
Allowing China and other Asian countries to join the WTO
3. Peak oil
The International Monetary Fund ranking of the countries with highest GNP
shows that the top 10 list is dominated by countries with an exceptional
degree of social cohesion. This is usually only possible in countries with a
European revolutionary conservatives believe in
cultural monoculturalism and to a large degree ethnocentrism because we know
that is the only proven way of preserving social cohesion levels is required
to facilitate a welfare state. Without social cohesion, no welfare state. We
believe that good borders makes good neighbours. We believe in democracy,
but we believe that the fundamental requirement for a democracy and a
welfare state requires social cohesion and a non-reformable cultural
conservative framework. The USA illustrates that you cannot have social
cohesion in a multicultural society.
3.103 The fall of the EUSSR,
the rise of the new nationalist European world order
CONSTRUCTION AND NOT EDITED)
We, the European Revolutionary
Conservatives, know very well that it will take many years, even decades
before we successfully manage to consolidate to a degree where we can seize
political and military power in the first Western European country. In the
USA, the Tea party movement is one of the first physical, political
manifestations which indicate that there is a great storm coming. The
creation of similar conservative organizations, even the creation of
revolutionary conservative movements such as the Knights Templar, is just
another manifestation that real resistance to the EUSSR/US cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist hegemony is about to materialize.
some of the founding fathers of the new world order. The conservative
martyrs of today, both democratic and revolutionary, will be remembered and
celebrated as the founding fathers when our cultural conservative world
order has been established in the European world within 20-70 years.
As human beings and political activists, we are obliged to sincerely
evaluate and re-evaluate all ideologies, National Socialism included. It is
uncertain whether we can achieve ideological progress and success without
defending principles embraced by the NS, such as monoculturalism.
genetic heritage is the most important cultural marker. It is a visual proof
that you represent a certain culture, certain traditions, a certain
identity. Many people I know who supports mass-Muslim immigration
deliberately avoid living with Muslims, simply because they don't like them.
But they still support mass-Muslim immigration.
nationalism: deportation and/or segregation is the most antiracist approach
(UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND NOT EDITED)
One of the reasons why all
African countries are failed states is due to lack of nationalistic
principles with subsequent lack of pride in their people and nation.
Africans who successfully emigrate from Africa are regarded as heroes by the
majority of Africans in the community they left behind. African pride cannot
be established until the day we clearly tell them that Europe is off limits
and all aid will cease immediately.
Consolidating Eurpean conservative organisations
3.105 A new conservatism/nationalism — Vienna school of thought
The Vienna school of thought, Crusader Nationalism, advocates a new
conservatism/nationalism, a hybrid of several conservative and
traditionalist directions. It is not a full-fledged ideology but can act as
an alternative to the Frankfurt school of thought.
platform advocates a strict anti-Jihad/Islamic stance, which indirectly
establishes a default friendly stance and support to Israel as an integral
part of its foundation.
The school is named after what its supporters
see as the most important battle in European history, the Battle of Vienna
in 1683, where the Islamic conquest of Western Europe was prevented by the
Holy League, led by John III Sobieski.
3.106 Creating patriotic youth movements in phase 1
According to MSM and the multiculturalist governments, all patriots are
fascists, racists and Nazis.
The Islamisation of Europe is a result
of the doctrines of multiculturalism.
We should strive to gain the
moral high ground. It is required that we reject and distance ourselves from
ALL 4 hate ideologies:
1. National Socialism
Patriotic youth groups (also referred to as
street activists) are the backbone of the resistance and the creation of
such political entities should be a primary goal. An intellectual club
(consisting of older professionals) who rejects the notion of offering
political and intellectual guidance to the youths of the society will have
limited impact. A large majority of the current European conservative
intellectuals are cowards and unwilling to take responsibility.
Creating patriotic youth groups is a pragmatic and necessary approach as we
cannot and should not trust that our police forces and military act in our
interest now or in the future. Both our police forces and military are lead
by the multiculturalist traitors we wish to defeat.
The British EDL
(English Defence League) has the moral high ground and can easily justify
their political standpoints as they publicly oppose racism and
Denmark doesn't have an EDL equivalent. Instead
they have Hells Angels, a criminal organisation claiming the title defender
of the Danish people. This is a typical example of a false prophet.
3.107 Consolidating moderate (non-military) European cultural
conservative organisations — phase 1 and 2
It is imperative that we,
the moderate cultural conservatives in Western Europe, spend the next
decades to recruit, build and consolidate our forces and try to reach a
common vision of a future Europe.
3.113 Assistance from
our European-American/Canadian/Australian brothers in the European civil war
European-Americans should assist their brothers in Europe. The faith of
multiculturalism will be decided in Europe. The war between cultural
conservatives and cultural Marxists will be fought in major European cities.
The doctrine of multiculturalism could have succeeded if it weren't for
3.114 Participation from conservative individuals among
the minority groups — Hindus, Buddhists and Christians
have the opportunity to show their loyalty to our cause, including
nationalist European Jews, non-European Christians or Hindu /Buddhist
3.115 Defeating multiculturalism within the next 7
decades will involve the synchronised and combined efforts (unofficial) of 8
Multiculturalism is a European hate ideology with
the aim of destroying European identity, culture, traditions, moral,
Christendom etc (Western civilisation).
3.116 An official
request/plead to all European patriots — Required administrative high
We hereby ask any and all European patriots
to actively target all members of patriotic related Facebook groups (and
non-FB networks) and invite them as friends, then send this compendium to
all members of these related groups.
1. Please contribute to distribute the book, 2083.
the compendium to ALL members of parliament in your country.
3. Send the
compendium to all journalists in your country.
4. Send the compendium to
all military and police personnel in your country.
5. Continue to develop
2083, A European Declaration of Independence.
Facebook and other social networking sites as a platform to consolidate and
grow the European resistance movement
If you are a European patriot
and you are not on Facebook you need to shape up and adapt. Get on Facebook
now and start to network with fellow patriots in all European countries.
3.118 Online recruiters for patriotic armed resistance movements/8th
front — primary administrative tasks
We will need
leaders/initiative takers/administrators that will use the internet/Facebook
and other online networks to preach and propagate armed resistance against
the cultural Marxist hegemony. Seizing political and military power in your
Western European country is the only way to ensure deportations of the
Muslims from Europe and actual self-determination for our people.
3.119 Teach your children the truth and do not allow them to be
indoctrinated by cultural Marxist/multiculturalist propaganda
many children is pointless, even counter-productive, if you fail to teach
them the truth and allow them to be indoctrinated by cultural
consolidation and considerations in Muslim-dominated Western European
Western European regimes use indirect torture as a method to
torment right wing political dissidents. They do this by placing us, the
nationalists and Crusaders, together with Jihadists and therefore indirectly
use the Muslims as a tool for torture and/or murder of our brothers. By
preventing Christian-Islamic segregation in Western European prisons, and
considering the fact that they knowingly place Crusaders of Jihadists in the
same cage, they are fully responsible for the atrocities committed by
Muslims against any and all European conservative/resistance
fighter/Crusader in prison. Many of our European brothers in the prison
systems are often harassed beaten and forced to convert to Islam or suffer
3.124 A politically incorrect
guide to the lynching of multiculturalist traitors (phase 2 and 3)
One of Western Europe's biggest historical mistakes was not to
punish/execute Marxists after WW2. Marxists who went into hiding during WW2
resurfaced and came back to Western European societies after the war. Most
of the lynchings were aimed at the National Socialists while the Marxists
for the most part were left in peace. As we all know, that generation of
Marxists were going to be instrumental in development and propagation of
cultural Marxist doctrine in Europe two decades later, which would later be
known under the name multiculturalism. If we had executed, let's say, 100 000
Marxist intellectuals in Western Europe after WW2 and banned all form of
Marxist doctrine, we could have prevented the creation of the anti-European
hate ideology known as multiculturalism. It is absolutely essential that we,
the cultural conservative patriots of Europe do not repeat this mistake
3.125 Investments and wealth protection in Europe during
phase 2 and 3 — civil war, how to protect your wealth
How do you
preserve wealth in times when the Four Horsemen (pestilence, war, famine and
death) are on the loose? What's the point of making money if you cannot
3.126 Building a cultural conservative
Marxist logic deemed our culture
and traditions not worth saving. Marxist logic, however, does not account
for the power of free will. It's up to each of us to prove that our cultures
and traditions are worth saving. Don't sit and wait for others to do your
job and duty for you. Join the resistance today.
3.129 Recommendations for cultural conservative senior and junior military
officers (phase 1, 2 and 3)
A majority of military officers
throughout Europe are disgusted with the current development in regards to
the Islamisation of Europe. These officers know that confrontations are
unavoidable and are monitoring the situation closely. But don't expect many
officers to risk their necks just yet.
3.130 The political
landscape in Western Europe, 2070-2080, before the initiation of phase 3
Israel is not really comparable to any Western European country. Israel has
a very small group of Muslims who are eligible to vote. In contrast, the
cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites of Western European countries have
given most of the Muslim residents the right to vote.
arises when you add the cultural Marxists/multiculturalists, the suicidal
humanists, the globalist capitalists, the pacifists and the Muslim block. It
is simply impossible to compete democratically with this alliance. We have
lost the democratic battle of Europe.
3.131 European Civil War,
Phase 3, 2070-2083
3.132 Predicted actions from other cultural
Expect a full NATO military
campaign. The Western establishment will condemn the coup and use harsh
rhetoric, call for boycotts etc. They may threaten to invade if France goes
ahead with deportations. The Muslim populations in France are expected to
entrench and refuse all deportation attempts by attempting to declare
independence (enclaves). They may also call for military assistance from the
Global Islamic Ummah and from Muslims in neighbouring countries. Their
strategy will most likely be to entrench and refuse deportation in the hopes
that NATO or the neighbouring countries will invade and overthrow the
3.137 Cultural conservative/nationalist reforms during and after
1. Prevent Islamic influence and repel all current
Islamic elements in Europe
2. Initiate European cultural renaissance
3. Militarily assist cultural conservative movements in neighbouring
4. Assist with coups in neighbouring countries and consolidate
3.140 Creating a European Federation, economic, cultural and
We need to imagine a grand monocultural
Europe, based on the cultural and economical cooperation of independent
countries that will in a larger degree be inseparably linked to Russia.
Having no need to be aggressive toward its neighbours, such a bloc would
become the premier world power, self-centered, pan-nationalistic and opposed
to all the dangerous dogmas now associated with globalism/multiculturalism.
The new European Federation will be much more isolationist.
will eventually become overconfident in Germany, the UK and France (we are
already seeing clear signs of this). Germany, France or the UK will come to
their senses. Europeans will gradually understand what our elites are doing
and will begin to wage a guerilla war. We will win due to the simple fact
that we have nowhere to go, while our colonisers still have their homelands
intact. France is likely to be the first country breaking out.
3.141 The negotiations between the European Federation and the
USASSR/EUSSR block and Muslim countries in phase 3
following approach should be followed when negotiating with Muslim nations:
1. All Sunni nations should be strongly advised to leave the Arab League and
apply for the status of a tertiary protectorate of the European Federation.
2. As for the negotiations with each Muslim country; any agreement must
include that they are willing to accept a fair share of expelled Muslim
individuals from European Federation countries.
3. Terms offered to
Muslim countries should be open for discussion and can be flexible as long
as it will benefit the long term goals of the European Federation and each
individual European country.
3.142 Future foreign policy — deportation and territorial claims
new conservative order should prepare for mass deportations of all Muslims
living in Europe. The first step will be the construction of huge transit
Most Muslims in Eastern Europe have lived there for several
centuries, so they will not accept being deported from Europe and will fight
for their survival. A more brutal military strategy must therefore be
Transit zones should be built close to a sea port and/or
railway line (depending on which transportation method will be used for the
deportation. It is essential that each area is fenced in with barb wire and
3.146 Evacuating Christians in the Middle East in regard to the new
There are around 12 million Christian
Assyrians, Copts, Maronites and other Christian Orthodox/Catholic minorities
who currently live under harsh Dhimmitude. Our objective is to offer them
citizenship in the new Christian nations. Measures must be taken to evacuate
As soon as Europe starts to deport Muslims; Egypt,
Syria, Iraq, Iran, Saudi and the rest of the Muslim World will declare war
against Israel, Armenia and all Christian minorities in the Middle East with
the intention of wiping them out. It’s therefore important that all
Christians in the Middle East are evacuated in the coming decades.
When the Muslim populations have been expelled from Europe, we will have
rather large unpopulated areas in Albania, Western Anatolia and Lebanon with
the capacity to offer a permanent home (territory) to several Christian
3.147 Quick list suggestions — future domestic and foreign policy
Obviously, these are my personal views.
Christian justification of the struggle
3.148 Pope Urban II and Pope Innocent III granted indulgence to all
future crusaders (martyrs of the Church)
In 1095 during the
Council of Clermont, Pope Urban II declared that he remitted all penance
incurred by anyone (crusaders) who participated in the first crusade. In the
12th century, Pope Innocent III expanded the crusade indulgence to include
anyone assisting with such endeavours.
3.149 The Bible and self-defence
claim that acts of self-defence are unbiblical, unscriptural and ungodly.
However, they are undoubtedly wrong.
3.150 A Book for the Knights Templar: In Praise of the New Knighthood (Liber
ad milites Templi: De laude novae militae)
The following passage is
taken from a treatise written between 1128 and 1146 by the Cistercian abbot
Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, on behalf of the fledgling Knights Templar. It
might be viewed as a combination of exhortation to the Knights, and
advertisement to the population in general. Officially it is an answer to a
letter written to Bernard by his friend Hugh de Payens, one of the founders
of the Templars. These first sections deal directly with the Knights Templar
and are of great importance to students of the early military orders.
3.151 There are no atheists in foxholes — preparing for martyrdom
European Christendom isn't just about having a personal relationship with
Jesus or God. It is so much more. Christendom is identity, moral, laws and
codexes which has produced the greatest civilisation the world has ever
I'm pretty sure I will pray to God as I'm rushing through
my city, guns blazing, with 100 armed system protectors pursuing me with the
intention to stop and/or kill. It is likely that I will pray to God for
strength at one point during that operation, as I think most people in that
situation would. In times of extreme stress or fear, such as when
participating in warfare or a martyrdom operation, all people will believe
in or hope for a higher power.
3.152 Justiciar Knights, Martyrdom vs. Suicide
is normally absolutely no justification or excuse to commit suicide. It is a
shameful, selfish and cowardly act, similar to that of murder. But if a
Justiciar Knight martyrs himself for the cause and dies, canon law
guarantees an abundance of grace and entry to heaven.
3.153 Interview with a Justiciar Knight Commander of the PCCTS,
The interview covers politics, society and
the struggle: the Western European civil war, the PCCTS, Knights Templar and
other armed pan-European and national resistance movements. It also covers
personal reflections and information.
3.154 Knights Templar
3.155 Successful militant organisations — case studies
3.160 Fourth generation warfare
warfare (4GW) is combat characterised by a blurring of the lines between war
and politics, soldier and civilian, peace and conflict, battlefield and
3.161 The study of revolutions
This article was
written by a Marxist.
Aims of the course
This course aims to
enable you to:
— Know more about the variety of revolutions past and
present and the different processes involved in revolutionary situations
— Understand more about the nature of revolution, its relationship to
the social order, and the issues determining the outcomes of revolution
— Think concretely about revolution and counter-revolution as skilled
human activities and relate your own experience to that of contemporary
revolutions which have shaped Irish and European society
3.162 A short introduction to agriculture and surface mining
AR No endorsement of the message is
implied by my presentation of this material. I merely wish to serve the
public need for clear information on a matter of current interest.